Adriaen de Vries – Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 – Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze in Copenhagen, Denmark Statens Museum for Kunst

3

Adrian-de-Vries - Hercules Fountain, Wallenstein Garden (ValdstejnskáZahrada), Prague, Czech Republic

Adrian-de-Vries - Hercules Fountain, Wallenstein Garden (ValdstejnskáZahrada), Prague, Czech Republic

Adriean-de-Vries-Horse-Prague

Adriean-de-Vries-Horse-Prague

Adrien-de-Vries-CentaurNessos-Héraclès-Déjanire-Louvre-Museum1

Adrien-de-Vries-CentaurNessos-Héraclès-Déjanire-Louvre-Museum1

Adrien-de-Vries-Triton-soufflant-dans-sa-conque-Stockholm-Sweden3

Adrien-de-Vries-Triton-soufflant-dans-sa-conque-Stockholm-Sweden3

Adrien-de-Vries-Cupid, Dionysus, Bachus, Ariane - Relief 1610-Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam

Adrien-de-Vries-Cupid, Dionysus, Bachus, Ariane - Relief 1610-Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam

 

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, - Herkulesbrunnen, 1597 - 1602, bronze, Herkules im Kampf mit der Hydra; Hercules slaying the Hydra, - Augsburg, Weinmarkt, Germany

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, - Herkulesbrunnen, 1597 - 1602, bronze, Herkules im Kampf mit der Hydra; Hercules slaying the Hydra, - Augsburg, Weinmarkt, Germany

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, - Herkulesbrunnen, 1597 - 1602, bronze, Herkules im Kampf mit der Hydra; Hercules slaying the Hydra, - Augsburg, Weinmarkt, Germany

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, - Herkulesbrunnen, 1597 - 1602, bronze, Herkules im Kampf mit der Hydra; Hercules slaying the Hydra, - Augsburg, Weinmarkt, Germany

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, - Herkulesbrunnen, 1597 - 1602, bronze, Herkules im Kampf mit der Hydra; Hercules slaying the Hydra, - Augsburg, Weinmarkt, Germany
Adriaen De Vries – Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 – Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, – Herkulesbrunnen, 1597 – 1602, bronze, Herkules im Kampf mit der Hydra; Hercules slaying the Hydra, – Augsburg, Weinmarkt, Germany
Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze - Allegory of the war against the Turks in Hungary, - Vienna, Austria, Kunsthistorisches Museum
Adriaen De Vries – Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 – Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze – Allegory of the war against the Turks in Hungary, – Vienna, Austria, Kunsthistorisches Museum

 

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze - Allegory of the war against the Turks in Hungary, - Vienna, Austria, Kunsthistorisches Museum

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze - Allegory of the war against the Turks in Hungary, - Vienna, Austria, Kunsthistorisches Museum

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze - Christ at the Column, - Vienna, Austria, Kunsthistorisches Museum

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze - Christ at the Column, - Vienna, Austria, Kunsthistorisches Museum

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze - Christ at the Column, - Vienna, Austria, Kunsthistorisches Museum

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze - Christ at the Column, - Vienna, Austria, Kunsthistorisches Museum

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze - Christ at the Column, - Vienna, Austria, Kunsthistorisches Museum

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze - Christ at the Column, - Vienna, Austria, Kunsthistorisches Museum

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adriaen de Vries. født Før 1546 - død 1626, Lazarus. 1615, Bronze, forgyldt, 65 cm

Adriaen de Vries. født Før 1546 - død 1626, Lazarus. 1615, Bronze, forgyldt, 65 cm

Adriaen de Vries. født Før 1546 - død 1626, Lazarus. 1615, Bronze, forgyldt, 65 cm

Adriaen de Vries. født Før 1546 - død 1626, Lazarus. 1615, Bronze, forgyldt, 65 cm

Adriaen de Vries. født Før 1546 - død 1626, Lazarus. 1615, Bronze, forgyldt, 65 cm

Adriaen de Vries. født Før 1546 - død 1626, Lazarus. 1615, Bronze, forgyldt, 65 cm

Adriaen de Vries. født Før 1546 - død 1626, Lazarus. 1615, Bronze, forgyldt, 65 cm

Adriaen de Vries. født Før 1546 – død 1626, Lazarus. 1615, Bronze, forgyldt, 65 cm

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Adriaen de Vries. født Før 1546 – død 1626, Lazarus. 1615, Bronze, forgyldt, 65 cm
Adriaen de Vries. født Før 1546 - død 1626, Lazarus. 1615, Bronze, forgyldt, 65 cm

Adriaen de Vries. født Før 1546 - død 1626, Lazarus. 1615, Bronze, forgyldt, 65 cm Adriaen de Vries. født Før 1546 - død 1626, Lazarus. 1615, Bronze, forgyldt, 65 cm Adriaen de Vries. født Før 1546 - død 1626, Lazarus. 1615, Bronze, forgyldt, 65 cm Adriaen de Vries. født Før 1546 - død 1626, Lazarus. 1615, Bronze, forgyldt, 65 cm

-

Adriaen de Vries. født Før 1546 - død 1626, Lazarus. 1615, Bronze, forgyldt, 65 cm

Adriaen de Vries. født Før 1546 - død 1626, Lazarus. 1615, Bronze, forgyldt, 65 cm

Adriaen de Vries. født Før 1546 – død 1626, Lazarus. 1615, Bronze, forgyldt, 65 cm

 

 

Adriaen de Vries – Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 – Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze in Copenhagen, Denmark Statens Museum for Kunst

 

Adriaen De Vries – Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 – Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze – Allegory of the war against the Turks in Hungary, - Vienna, Austria, Kunsthistorisches Museum

 

 

 

Adriaen De Vries – Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 – Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze – Christ at the Column, – Vienna, Austria, Kunsthistorisches Museum

 

{Adriean de Vries studied with Giambologna of Bologna Flanders (now France). Giambologna studied in Flanders and then traveled to Italy where he copied from Hellenistic Greek sculpture for seven years and received critiques from Michelangelo. Adriean de Vries was one of many assistants to Giambologna’s sculpture studio production. de Vries was one of the most talented of the many assistants to study under Giambologna. Giambologna is primarily responsible for the spread of Hellenistic Greek sculpture influence through the rest of Europe outside of Italy. This spread of Hellenistic Greek sculpture occured through a number of his assistants returning to their home lands with the training and exposure to Greek Hellenistic sculpture via Giambologna’s studio training, and requirement of a working language within the influence of Hellenistic. Giambologna’s own sculpture is a little slick in the glyptek techtonic geometric form compared to the Greek Hellenistic. The seven years he spent copying the Greek Hellenistic sculpture in Italy though enabled him to have a deep understanding of much of the Hellenistic sculpture content, even though the results were a a little slick in comparison. Giambologna started a style derived from Michelangelo’s influence combined with a reinterpretation from the Hellenistic Greek. Forma Serpentina, Running Rhythmic Planes are emphasized in his work. This Forma Serpentina was started by Michelangelo in his extraction from Hellenistic sculpture theory, and then taken to more extremes by Giambologna. The “Static Fractured Shape – Geometry” of the form is subordinate to large degree in Gimbolognas sculpture, making the work more stylized, and more slick (less complex) than Michalangelo’s more mature sculptures. Adriean de Vries brings the “Static Planar Geometric Fracturing” back to the main emphasis without subjugating the “Running Rhythmic Shape / Forma Serpentina”. The degree of complexity in the sculpture in Adriean de Vries best output though is nowhere near the complexity seen in mature Greek Hellenistic sculpture. The style though is more even with the content of form than many of his peers. This is an unusual combination of elements in European sculpture, and place de Vries in a very idiosyncratic position for his style, and content in this period of art. His best work is very beautifully executed.

“At 30 years old de Vries became an assistant to Pompeo Leoni (c. 1533 – 1608) son of Cavalier Leone Leoni (1509 – 1590), working in Milan starting in 1586, leaving Giambologna’s workshop (the Duchy of Milan was ruled by Spain through a Spanish Govener) for a comission for the high altar of Philip II’s palace monastery of San Lorenzo de El Escorial in the Guadarrama mountains 50 kilometres north-west of Madrid. San Lorenzo de El Escorial was conceived as a mausoleum for the Spanish Hapsburgs. Pompeo Leoni, in collaboration with Jacopo da Trezzo and Jaun Bautista Comane, signed a contract at the Escorial in January 1579, he undertook to deliver fifteen larger than lifesize figures – apostles, evangelists, fathers of the church, and a Calvary group, all in gilded bronze – as well as a large number of classical architectual elements for the structure of the altarpiece. In addition there were thirteen smaller bronzes to adorn the tabernacle. For this El Escorial commission de Vries worked on the St. Andrew (1588) Third tier of the Escorial high altar; St. John the Evangelist, (1588) Second tier of the Escorial high altar; and St. James, (1588) Third tier of the Escorial high altar. Adriean de Vries then left next to Turin where in March 1588 he became the court sculptor for a short time of the King of Piedimonte / Torino – Carlo Emmanuele, Duke of Savoy. Next de Vries was then sent to Prague as the court sculptor under Maximillian, and August I, Rudolf II, the brother in law of Philip II of Spain. ” – taken from {Adriaen de Vries 1556 – 1626 imperial sculptor, catalog book for an international show, Amsterdam, Stockholm, Los Angeles, Waanders Publishers, Zwolle; December 1998 – Rijsmuseum – March 1999; National Mseum, Stockholm April 1999 – August 1999; J. Paul Getty Museum – October 1999 – January 2000}

Very uneven output through his career – mostly because of the trouble of controlled casting of the bronze in Prague. Much of his output is very uneven, with some remarkable sculptures; along side others that are of varying quality during his whole period of work. The sculpture of de Vries is a very different combination of emphysis on the content of form arriving at a style than Michelangelo, but of advanced results in his best work. Both artist – Michelangelo, and de Vries successfully used variables extracted from Hellenistic Greek sculpture, with differing emphysis in form content. In years that are more recent his work has received exposure in exhibitions, as well as a number of books and some media published on his life and work. Important locations of his outdoor monuments are in Augsburg, Germany; Prague, Czech Republic; Frederiksborg, Denmark; Nationalmuseum in Stockholm; Emperor Rudolf II, and Maxillian of Prague were involved in interests of Alchemy. Some of Adriean de Vries sculpture is within this subject matter. The subject of Alchemy is represented in a rather dense literalist, and inacurate interpretation in history since it’s philosphy is rather at odds with the Catholic Church viewpoint. The involvement within the philosophy of Gnostic Alchemy also was not the best alignment to position oneself within considering the various Inquisition periods. }

bloger, PBP

 Adriaen de Vries’ career epitomizes the internationalism of the late Mannerist period. He was born in The Hague, trained in Italy, and worked mainly in Prague. His is the time-honored tradition of the itinerant artist, working for many of Europe’s most discerning royal patrons. Little is known about de Vries until 1581, when he was an assistant in Giambologna’s Florentine workshop. There he trained as a bronzeworker and absorbed much of Giambologna’s sophisticated Mannerist style. De Vries’ association with Rudolf II, Holy Roman Emperor, whose rare works of art were the greatest collection of the age, began in 1593. He became court sculptor in 1601. Among de Vries’ works for the reclusive monarch was a bronze relief representing Rudolf II’s 1585 imperial decree that painting should be considered among the liberal arts. The idea that visual artists should be raised above the level of craftsmen developed during the Italian Renaissance, but Rudolf II made it official. After Rudolf II’s death in 1612, de Vries continued working for aristocratic clients, creating numerous funerary monuments, life-size sculptures, fountains, and church fonts. In his late style, he worked the bronze to create a soft, sketchy effect.

J. Paul Getty Museum, Los Angeles
Rearing Horse, 1610
Juggling Man, 1610
Liechtenstein Museum, Vienna
Christ in Distress, 1607 (Zoom)
St Sebastian, 1613/15 (Zoom)
Liechtenstein Museum, Vienna
Bacchus finds Ariadne on Naxos, 1611
Louvre Museum, Paris
Mercury and Psyche, 1593
Adriaen de Vries in the Louvre Museum Database, Paris (only available in French)
Adriaen de Vries at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York City
Apollo, ca.1595-97
Adriaen de Vries at the National Gallery of Art, Washington D.C.
Empire Triumphant over Avarice, 1610
Adriaen de Vries at the Rijksmuseum, Amsterdam
 2 works online
Rijksmuseum Research Database, Amsterdam (in Dutch)

The Royal Collection, London, UK
(Zoomable – click “Magnify image”)

Courtauld Institute of Art, London, UK
 3 works by or related to the artist

Dresden State Art Collections

Frick Collection, New York City
Nessus and Deianira, bronze, 1626

Kunst Indeks Danmark – database of artworks in Danish museums
 - Works viewable online are marked with a red “X”
- Click “English” for the English-language version of the website

Palazzo Ruspoli, Rome (in Italian)

Victoria and Albert Museum Catalogue, London, UK
The Emperor Rudolph II, bronze, 1609

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-

-

Estilo herreriano
(El Escorial)

- 

 

Adriaen De Vries – Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 – Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, – Emperor Rudolf II, - Vienna, Austria, Weltliche Schatzkammer

 

Adriaen De Vries – Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 – Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, – Pysche borne aloft by putti, - Stockholm, Nationalmuseum, Sweden

 

-

Christ in Distress, 1607
Bronze with brown natural patina
height 149 cm
Signed and dated on the back of the plinth: ADRIANUS FRIES HAGENSIS / FECIT 1607
 
 -

 

-

 

St Sebastian, 1613/1615
Bronze with olive-brown natural patina
height 200 cm
Signed on the side of the base plinth: ADRIANVS FRIES HAGIENSIS BATAVVS
 
 -

-

Vulkan in seiner Werkstatt
Vries, A. de, 1611, Rel
München, BNM 28 “

-

ADRIAN DE FRIES
BACCHUS FINDET ARIADNE AUF NAXOS,

Bacchus findet Ariadne auf Naxos, 1611,

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Bronze
Höhe 52,5 cm, Breite 42 cm
Rijksmuseum Amsterdam
On this relief Adrian has shown de frieze a scene from the history of Ariadne and Bacchus which comes from the Eikones of Philostratus to the old person. De frieze has escorted for his relief the moment peripateia, the tension-loaded turning point of the history elective, as a Bacchus, from a satyr with a torch which sleeping Ariadne on her bed on the island Naxos finds and falls in love immortally with them. Cupid sitting beside the bed is certainly a tip to it.
The owl beside him counts as a symbol of the night, while Ariadnes mules are a symbolic reference to her female power.
The sculptor fell back for this scene in a graphic representation way as it was often used by the North European mannerists for various classical god’s legends, as for example that of the volcano surprises Mars and Venus with the adultery, or Jupiter and Danaë or Cupid and psyche.
The bronze from the Rijksmuseum can be dated on account of the stylistic resemblance to 1609 passé reliefs Rudolph II as a sponsor of the arts (Royal Collections, Windsor Castle) and on about 1611 passé reliefs with the workshop of the volcano (Munich, Bavarian national museum) on 1611.
The principal of the piece of art presumably came from the immediate sphere of the Prager court, most probably even from the court nobility himself. The bronze from the Rijksmuseum and the relief workshop of the volcano from the national museum in Munich, both for 1611 dateable, could have belonged to own row which was dedicated to the gods of the antiquity as symbols for five senses or four seasons.
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-

ADRIAEN DE FRIES,

Bacchus finds Ariadne on Naxos, 1611
Bronze
height 52,5 cm, width 42 cm, Rijksmuseum Amsterdam
 
In this relief Adrian de Fries depicted a scene from the story of Ariadne and Bacchus that comes from the Eikones by Philostratus the Elder. De Fries chose to depict the moment of the peripateia – the exciting turning point in the story – when Bacchus, guided by a torch-bearing satyr, finds the sleeping Ariadne in her bed on the island of Naxos and falls deeply in love with her. Cupid who sits by the bed is undoubtedly pointing to this. The owl beside him is the symbol of the night; Ariadne’s slippers are a symbolic reference to her female power. In fact, the sculptor reverted to a pictorial formula for this setting that was much employed by the northern Mannerists for depicting some classical stories of the gods, such as Vulcan surprising the adulterous Mars and Venus in bed, Jupiter and Danaë or Cupid and Psyche.
The Amsterdam bronze can be dated to around 1611 on the grounds of stylistic similarities to the relief of Rudolph II as Patron of the Arts (Royal Collections, Windsor Castle), which is dated 1609, and to the Forge of Vulcan (Munich, Bayerisches Nationalmuseum), which dates from 1611. We should probably seek the patron of the work in the immediate vicinity of the Prague court, most likely among the court nobility. The Amsterdam bronze and the relief of the Forge of Vulcan in Munich, both datable to 1611, might have belonged to a single ensemble devoted to classical gods as symbols of the Five Senses or the Four Seasons.
Rijksmuseum Amsterdam

-

-

-

Attribué à Adriaen de VRIES
Vers 1545 – 1626

Hercule, Déjanire et le centaure Nessus
1603 – 1608
Prague
Bronze
H. : 82 cm. ; L. : 50 cm. ; l. : 37 cm.

Bronze de la Couronne N° 301, Louvre, Paris, France

-

-

Triton, Year c. 1615-17, Adriaen de Vries, Bronze, patina, h. 157 cm

A lifesize bronze statue of a nude figure, depicted twisting round as he sits on a ring of fish. The man’s head is turning to the right and is slightly raised as he blows on a horn-shaped shell held in his right hand. His eyes are fixed on the horn and his cheeks are puffed up as he blows; he gives it all the power and concentration he can muster. The bronze figure is a tritonTritonIn classical mythology Triton was originally a sea-god or merman, half man and half fish. He was the son of the sea-god Neptune and the Nereid or sea-nymph Amphitrite. Later he was considered one of the sea creatures in the group of tritons that escorted Neptune. The tritons dashed about on the waves, blowing their conches like horns. They were depicted either as ‘human’ sea-creatures, or as a kind of ‘sea-centaur’: half man, half horse.: a sea creature belonging to the sea god Neptune’s entourage. The tritons dash over the waves and often use a shell, as here, for a horn. With the sound of their horns they could raise a storm or calm the sea.

-

-

Adriaen de Vries

. født Før 1546 – død 1626, Lazarus. 1615, Bronze, forgyldt, 65 cm
Statens Museum for Kunst, 5493, tidligere Kunstkammeret, 1905
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

-

-

Adriaen de Vries, De Farnesische stier, 1614

--

Adriaen de Vries. født Før 1546 – død 1626,
Museumstitel: Laokoon. 1560-1626: Påbegyndt: baseret på kunstnerens årstal afsluttet: baseret på kunstnerens årstal
Museumstitel: Laocoön
Bronze, forgyldt, 63 cm
Statens Museum for Kunst, 5494, tidligere Kunstkammeret, 1905
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

-

Bust

-

 image for id 2006AY9455

-

The Emperor Rudolph II,
Date 1609,
Bronze,
Vries, Adriaen de, born ca. 1545 – died 1626
Prague, Czech Republic
Height 71.1 cm, Width 52.7 cm, Victoria & Albert Museum, London, United Kingdom
 
This bronze portrait of Rudolph II is the last in a series of three that Adriaen de Vries produced at the Emperor’s court workshop in Prague. Two signed busts of 1603 and 1607, now in the Kunsthistorisches Museum in Vienna, preceded it. The relief is signed under the left edge ‘ADRIANVS FRIES·FEC:’; the sitter is identified by another inscription, ‘RVD:II·ROM·IMP:CAES:AVG AET:SVAE:LVII·ANNO·1609′ (‘Rudolph II, Roman Emperor, Caesar Augustus, aged 57, in the year 1609′). The lion mask on the pauldron (the plate of armour covering the shoulders and upper arms), the supporting imperial eagle and the allegorical reliefs on the cuirass, depicting Hercules holding up the world and Minerva with a trophy of arms and a statue of Victory, allude to the Emperor’s military and political power. Adriaen de Vries was born in The Hague probably in about 1545, and like many of his fellow countrymen he went to Italy to gain experience. There he worked in Florence in the workshop of Giambologna and as court sculptor for Duke Carl Emmanuel I of Savoy in Turin. By the 1590s he was back north of the Alps, in Augsburg, Germany, where he executed the bronzes for the Mercury and Hercules fountains between 1597 and 1602. In 1601 he was appointed court sculptor to Rudolph II, before moving to Prague the following year. This portrait was recorded in the inventory of Rudolph’s Cabinet of Curiosities at Prague by 1611, but before 1652 it had entered the collection of Queen Christina of Sweden, having been confiscated – together with many other sculptures by de Vries – as war booty during the Thirty Years’ War (1618-1648).
        

 

-

-

-

-

De Numagareis 2001, onder het motto: “De Dikke Hertog achterna”, had als reisdoel het voormalige hertogdom Brunswijk-Wolfenbuttel (onder Hannover), de standplaats was Hameln, en het gezelschap bezocht onder meer Hildesheim, Braunschweig, Bückeburg, Stadthagen, Wolfenbüttel, Detmold en Lemgo.
De reis (alleen voor Numagaleden) telde 49 deelnemers, volgens traditie voorzien van een uitvoerige reisbeschrijving van reiscommissielid en reisontwerper dr. M. Bogaarts, met deze keer ook bijdragen van dr. N. Bootsma en drs. P. Wermenbol.
U kon niet mee? Jammer. Reis Numaga virtueel een stukje achterna via de links in de volgende reisbeschrijving. Na de koffiestop in Bad Bentheim, dat met zijn burcht-rots in de Gouden Eeuw zoveel Nederlandse schilders wist te boeien, gold de tweede stop het stadje Bückeburg met zijn prachtige barokke Evangelische Stadskerk (1611/15) waarin onder meer de beroemde doopvont van Adriaen de Vries. Aansluitend stond het idyllisch gelegen slot van de familie Schaumburg-Lippe op het programma, vermaard om het spectaculaire houtsnijwerk in kapel en Gouden Zaal (rond 1600). In het 15 km oostelijker gelegen Stadthagen, dat beschikt over een stadhuis in Weserrenaissancestijl en een bekoorlijk stadsplein met oude vakwerkhuizen: bezoek aan het mausoleum in vroeg-barokke stijl voor de vorsten van Schaumburg, eveneens van de hand van Adriaen de Vries (datering: 1609/25), bij de Martinikerk. Overnachting in het oude plaatsje Hameln.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Adriaen de Vries
Empire Triumphant over Avarice,
1610
Widener Collection
1942.9.148, National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C.

-

-

Adriaen de Vries
detail: Empire Triumphant over Avarice, 1610

-

-

-

-

Adriaen de Vries
detail: Empire Triumphant over Avarice, 1610, National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C.,

National Gallery of Art Brief Guide

Adriaen de Vries was one of the leading late Renaissance masters of northern Europe. His heroic figures — female as well as male — reflect study of the antique and of Michelangelo’s sculpture, with an emphasis on self-consciously complicated, twisting poses.

Adriaen devised this bronze allegory for the Holy Roman Emperor Rudolf II, who had appointed him court sculptor at Prague in 1601. Once thought simply to represent “Virtue Overcoming Vice,” the bronze has recently been interpreted as a specific theme close to the Emperor’s heart. The dominant female figure, crowned with laurel, symbolizes Empire. The second laurel wreath she holds high proclaims her victory over a figure with ass’ ears and a bag of gold coins that identify her as Avarice (the ears and the gold come from the ancient myth of King Midas, known for his greed and bad judgment). Rudolf was fighting, none too successfully, in wars against the Turks, and also struggling with the lands he ruled that were reluctant to grant the funds he needed to continue. The bronze gives form to his wish for triumph over both adversaries. The sculptor gave psychological force to this symbolic program in the rippling tension of the torsos and in the gaze that passes between the coolly imperious victor and the distraught vanquished.

From the Tour: Mannerism

Adriaen de Vries was born in the Netherlands, but he spent considerable time in Italy. This statuette reveals the influence of Michelangelo and the Florentine sculptor Giambologna, with whom de Vries worked. The figures are powerful, their interaction energetic and dynamic. Even the surface is animated, reflecting light from restlessly modulated planes.

This statuette was made for the Hapsburg emperor Rudolph II in Prague, after de Vries had been appointed a court artist. An allegorical figure of Empire holds the wreath of victory over a vanquished figure of Avarice, a money bag at her feet. The theme of empire triumphant is natural enough, but why the triumph over avarice? In the early 1600s Rudolph was in a weakened political position and hard pressed to pay for his wars against the Turks. He blamed his failures on grudging and insufficient financial support. At least in his private study, where he kept this bronze, he could contemplate an unrealized triumph over stingy “allies.”

Rudolf II is often remembered as a great patron of art, as someone who was passionate about collecting and who managed to create the largest art collection in all Europe, called “Kunstkammer”. Rudolf’s sculptors included the pupil of the renowned Italian Giovanni Bologna, Adrian de Vries, who worked in Prague particularly in the years 1601 -1612. After Rudolf’ death in 1626 he worked for Albrecht of Wallenstein. The most famous works of Adrian de Vries include the portrait busts of the Emperor, his equestrian statue and the sculptures he created for the garden of Wallenstein Palace, which are now in Sweden. His works are now parts of exhibitions in London, Gotha, Drottningholm and Paris.

-

-

Adriaen de Vries
Rearing Horse
ca. 1610-15
bronze

-

-

Rearing Horse

Dutch, 1610 – 1615
Bronze
19 1/2 x 21 1/2 x 7 in.

This rearing horse’s two rear legs, upon which he balances his powerful bulk, serve as the sole support for the body of this large animal. Pawing the air and tilting his head to the left, the horse electrifies the space around him. The sculptor Adriaen de Vries further suggested the animal’s vitality through the open mouth, flaring nostrils, and protruding veins on its belly. The horse’s lack of shoes suggests that this is a stallion kept for stud.
De Vries executed more than a dozen bronze statuettes of horses and horses with riders, only four of which survive or are securely identified. This is one of the rare signed ones. The horse’s daring pose makes it a tour de force of bronze casting, and the beauty of its patina, or surface treatment, testifies to the artist’s reputation as an exceptional bronzemaker.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

Getty Museum Bookmark notes
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

-

-

Juggling Man

Dutch, about 1610 – 1615
Bronze
2 ft. 6 1/4 in. x 1 ft. 8 3/8 in. x 8 5/8 in.
90.SB.44

-

-

Adriaen de Vries
Juggling Figure
ca. 1610-15
bronze

-

Juggling Man:S-curve of figure's back

-

Juggling Man

Dutch, about 1610 – 1615
Bronze
2 ft. 6 1/4 in. x 1 ft. 8 3/8 in. x 8 5/8 in.
90.SB.44

-

-

Adriaen de Vries
Juggling Figure
ca. 1610-15
(back)
bronze

At a crucial moment in an acrobatic juggling trick, this male figure holds one plate perched precariously on the fingertips of his right hand while another plate, held by centrifugal force, seems suspended. Further complicating the pose, the man looks at the ground and steps on a bellows. Dutch artist Adriaen de Vries based the composition of this bronze statue on a famous Hellenistic marble of a dancing faun, which Michelangelo was believed to have restored while it was in the collection of the Medici in Florence. Although de Vries borrowed the original statue’s composition, he replaced the faun’s foot organ with a bellows and substituted plates for the faun’s cymbals.
This work of artistic virtuosity combines vitality and movement with balance. The strong S-curve on the figure’s back demonstrates the complexity of his balancing act. The artist may also have had in mind the German word kunststückemachen, which means both to juggle and, more literally, to make a work of art. The use of a verbal conceit such as this one and the exploration of a figure moving in space are characteristic of the Baroque style.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

Adriaen de Vries’ career epitomizes the internationalism of the late Mannerist period. He was born in The Hague, trained in Italy, and worked mainly in Prague. His is the time-honored tradition of the itinerant artist, working for many of Europe’s most discerning royal patrons. Little is known about de Vries until 1581, when he was an assistant in Giambologna’s Florentine workshop. There he trained as a bronzeworker and absorbed much of Giambologna’s sophisticated Mannerist style. De Vries’ association with Rudolf II, Holy Roman Emperor, whose rare works of art were the greatest collection of the age, began in 1593. He became court sculptor in 1601. Among de Vries’ works for the reclusive monarch was a bronze relief representing Rudolf II’s 1585 imperial decree that painting should be considered among the liberal arts. The idea that visual artists should be raised above the level of craftsmen developed during the Italian Renaissance, but Rudolf II made it official. After Rudolf II’s death in 1612, de Vries continued working for aristocratic clients, creating numerous funerary monuments, life-size sculptures, fountains, and church fonts. In his late style, he worked the bronze to create a soft, sketchy effect.

Getty Collection Bookmark notes

-

-

Adriaen de Vries
Juggling Figure
ca. 1610-15
(detail of hand)
bronze

-

Conservation image

-

-

-

The sculpture of Christ is on loan from the National Museum in Warsaw and originally stood at a tombstone in a village near Wroclaw, Silesia.”

This exhibition is about Silesia, which is a very interesting cultural landscape and historical region in Central Europe that is divided into two states today – the Czech Republic and Poland. The exhibition is generally divided into three historical memories – the German, Polish, and the Bohemian.” Dita Asiedu

-

Wednesday March 28, 2007 – 10:47am (EDT) Edit | Delete | Permanent Link | 0 Comments

Entry for March 28, 2007

 magnify Adriaen De Vries – Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 – Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze – Allegory of the war against the Turks in Hungary, - Vienna, Austria, Kunsthistorisches Museum

 

Provenance: 1607 commissioned by Prince Karl I von Liechtenstein, after 1671 with “Christ in Distress” (SK 515), probably placed in the Valtice parish church, since 1807 in the Liechtenstein Garden Palace at Rossau
 
Legend has it that St Sebastian was a captain of the praetorian guard at the imperial court of Diocletian. He ignored an existing ban and adopted the Christian faith, converting many to Christianity. The Roman emperor had him tied to a tree and executed by Numidian archers. In this sculpture, Adrian de Fries does not show the dramatic climax of the events, but the moment before the saint is martyred. His helplessness is indicated by his bonds and his unprotected nakedness, which again presents an opportunity to show viewers an ideal body. He is seen standing on the ground from which a tree grows. The figure needs the tree for reasons of statics: the figure does not derive its tension solely from its emphatic contrapposto, a pose in which one part of a figure twists or turns away from another, but also from the fact that the central part of the body leans forward. One hand is bound above the figure’s head, the other behind its back, which lends an S-shaped curve to the whole figure. The three-dimensional modelling of the muscles has been appositely described as a “nervously vibrating surface”.

 

Provenance: 1607 commissioned by Prince Karl I von Liechtenstein, after 1671 with St Sebastian (SK 562), probably placed in the Valtice parish church, since 1807 in the Liechtenstein Garden Palace in Rossau
 
The impressive, almost life-size devotional “Christ in Distress” by Adrian de Frieseloquently expresses a crucial passage in the story of Christ’s Passion in which the Son of God has sacrificed himself to redeem mankind. This is identified by a Biblical quotation from Paul’s first Epistle to the Corinthians: “EMPTI ESTIS PRETIO MAGNO” (For you are bought dearly). There is no scriptural source for the subject depicted.

Christ, sitting on a rock, folding his hands and asking for mercy, seems to be waiting for Pilate’s men. The suffering to come shows clearly in his face. This sculpture derives its expressive force from the contrast between Christ’s suffering features and the classical beauty of his athletic body. The pose with crossed legs goes back to a famous woodcut of the Man of Sorrows by Albrecht Dürer. This choice of model is no coincidence, as Dürer’s art was greatly admired again at the imperial court around 1600. But the shape of the sculpture reveals the sculptor’s experience of Hellenistic work like the Belvedere Torso and the work of Michelangelo, which he had studied in Florence and Rome. Contemporaries took the Torso to represent Hercules. As the ancient hero was also interpreted as a prefiguration of Christ, it seemed entirely logical to adopt some formal criteria of his sculptural type when creating a figure of Christ. Rubens presented the Roman consul Decius Mus as a Christian martyr, and here we see this fertile relationship between religious and secular iconography working in the opposite direction. The thrusting scale of the seated, ultimately highly complicated, pose for the figure of Christ is typical of de Fries, and results from carefully balanced opposing twists of the body.
De Fries does not try to make the flesh look natural in his three-dimensional modelling of the body: the arched surface of the athletic chest goes well beyond the natural anatomy of muscles and sinews, forming an almost abstract structure. De Fries exploits the natural qualities of bronze as a material and shows them to their best advantage.
Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, - Herkulesbrunnen, 1597 - 1602, bronze, Herkules im Kampf mit der Hydra; Hercules slaying the Hydra, - Augsburg, Weinmarkt, Germany

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, - Herkulesbrunnen, 1597 - 1602, bronze, Herkules im Kampf mit der Hydra; Hercules slaying the Hydra, - Augsburg, Weinmarkt, Germany

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, - Herkulesbrunnen, 1597 - 1602, bronze, Herkules im Kampf mit der Hydra; Hercules slaying the Hydra, - Augsburg, Weinmarkt, Germany

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, - Herkulesbrunnen, 1597 - 1602, bronze, Herkules im Kampf mit der Hydra; Hercules slaying the Hydra, - Augsburg, Weinmarkt, Germany

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, - Herkulesbrunnen, 1597 - 1602, bronze, Herkules im Kampf mit der Hydra; Hercules slaying the Hydra, - Augsburg, Weinmarkt, Germany

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, - Herkulesbrunnen, 1597 - 1602, bronze, Herkules im Kampf mit der Hydra; Hercules slaying the Hydra, - Augsburg, Weinmarkt, Germany

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, - Herkulesbrunnen, 1597 - 1602, bronze, Herkules im Kampf mit der Hydra; Hercules slaying the Hydra, - Augsburg, Weinmarkt, Germany

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, - Herkulesbrunnen, 1597 - 1602, bronze, Herkules im Kampf mit der Hydra; Hercules slaying the Hydra, - Augsburg, Weinmarkt, Germany

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, - Herkulesbrunnen, 1597 - 1602, bronze, Herkules im Kampf mit der Hydra; Hercules slaying the Hydra, - Augsburg, Weinmarkt, Germany

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, - Herkulesbrunnen, 1597 - 1602, bronze, Herkules im Kampf mit der Hydra; Hercules slaying the Hydra, - Augsburg, Weinmarkt, Germany

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, - Herkulesbrunnen, 1597 - 1602, bronze, Herkules im Kampf mit der Hydra; Hercules slaying the Hydra, - Augsburg, Weinmarkt, Germany

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, - Herkulesbrunnen, 1597 - 1602, bronze, Herkules im Kampf mit der Hydra; Hercules slaying the Hydra, - Augsburg, Weinmarkt, Germany

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, - Herkulesbrunnen, 1597 - 1602, bronze, Herkules im Kampf mit der Hydra; Hercules slaying the Hydra, - Augsburg, Weinmarkt, Germany

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, - Herkulesbrunnen, 1597 - 1602, bronze, Herkules im Kampf mit der Hydra; Hercules slaying the Hydra, - Augsburg, Weinmarkt, Germany

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, - Herkulesbrunnen, 1597 - 1602, bronze, Herkules im Kampf mit der Hydra; Hercules slaying the Hydra, - Augsburg, Weinmarkt, Germany

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, - Herkulesbrunnen, 1597 - 1602, bronze, Herkules im Kampf mit der Hydra; Hercules slaying the Hydra, - Augsburg, Weinmarkt, Germany

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, - Herkulesbrunnen, 1597 - 1602, bronze, Herkules im Kampf mit der Hydra; Hercules slaying the Hydra, - Augsburg, Weinmarkt, Germany

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, - Herkulesbrunnen, 1597 - 1602, bronze, Herkules im Kampf mit der Hydra; Hercules slaying the Hydra, - Augsburg, Weinmarkt, Germany

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, - Herkulesbrunnen, 1597 - 1602, bronze, Herkules im Kampf mit der Hydra; Hercules slaying the Hydra, - Augsburg, Weinmarkt, Germany

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, - Herkulesbrunnen, 1597 - 1602, bronze, Herkules im Kampf mit der Hydra; Hercules slaying the Hydra, - Augsburg, Weinmarkt, Germany

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, - Herkulesbrunnen, 1597 - 1602, bronze, Herkules im Kampf mit der Hydra; Hercules slaying the Hydra, - Augsburg, Weinmarkt, Germany

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, - Herkulesbrunnen, 1597 - 1602, bronze, Herkules im Kampf mit der Hydra; Hercules slaying the Hydra, - Augsburg, Weinmarkt, Germany

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, - Herkulesbrunnen, 1597 - 1602, bronze, Herkules im Kampf mit der Hydra; Hercules slaying the Hydra, - Augsburg, Weinmarkt, Germany

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, - Herkulesbrunnen, 1597 - 1602, bronze, Herkules im Kampf mit der Hydra; Hercules slaying the Hydra, - Augsburg, Weinmarkt, Germany

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, - Herkulesbrunnen, 1597 - 1602, bronze, Herkules im Kampf mit der Hydra; Hercules slaying the Hydra, - Augsburg, Weinmarkt, Germany

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, - Herkulesbrunnen, 1597 - 1602, bronze, Herkules im Kampf mit der Hydra; Hercules slaying the Hydra, - Augsburg, Weinmarkt, Germany

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, - Emperor Rudolf II, - Vienna, Austria, Weltliche Schatzkammer
Adriaen De Vries – Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 – Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, – Emperor Rudolf II, – Vienna, Austria, Weltliche Schatzkammer
Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, - Herkulesbrunnen, 1597 - 1602, bronze, Herkules im Kampf mit der Hydra; Hercules slaying the Hydra, - Augsburg, Weinmarkt, Germany

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, - Herkulesbrunnen, 1597 - 1602, bronze, Herkules im Kampf mit der Hydra; Hercules slaying the Hydra, - Augsburg, Weinmarkt, Germany

 

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, - Herkulesbrunnen, 1597 - 1602, bronze, Herkules im Kampf mit der Hydra; Hercules slaying the Hydra, - Augsburg, Weinmarkt, Germany

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, - Herkulesbrunnen, 1597 - 1602, bronze, Herkules im Kampf mit der Hydra; Hercules slaying the Hydra, - Augsburg, Weinmarkt, Germany

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, - Herkulesbrunnen, 1597 - 1602, bronze, Herkules im Kampf mit der Hydra; Hercules slaying the Hydra, - Augsburg, Weinmarkt, Germany

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, - Herkulesbrunnen, 1597 - 1602, bronze, Herkules im Kampf mit der Hydra; Hercules slaying the Hydra, - Augsburg, Weinmarkt, Germany

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, - Herkulesbrunnen, 1597 - 1602, bronze, Herkules im Kampf mit der Hydra; Hercules slaying the Hydra, - Augsburg, Weinmarkt, Germany
Adriaen De Vries – Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 – Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, – Herkulesbrunnen, 1597 – 1602, bronze, Herkules im Kampf mit der Hydra; Hercules slaying the Hydra, – Augsburg, Weinmarkt, Germany
Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, - Pysche borne aloft by putti, - Stockholm, Nationalmuseum, Sweden

Adriaen De Vries - Den Hague, Netherlands, 1556 - Prague, Bohemia, 1626; bronze, - Pysche borne aloft by putti, - Stockholm, Nationalmuseum, Sweden

 

-

 

 

-

Attribué à Leone LEONI
vers 1509 – 1590

Ippolita Gonzaga (1535 – 1563), femme d’Antonio Caraffa
Revers : Femme drapée et instruments de musique
D. : 6,20 cm., Louvre, Paris, France

-

-

-

Leone Leoni
Andrea Doria, 1468-1560, Genoese Admiral, 1541
Samuel H. Kress Collection, National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C.,

-

-

-

Leone Leoni
Blind Man with a Staff and Water-flask, Led by a Dog
, c. 1561
Samuel H. Kress Collection, National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C.

-

-

-

-

Leone Leoni
Michelangelo Buonarroti, 1475-1564, Florentine Artist, c. 1561
Samuel H. Kress Collection, National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C.

-

Charles V, Victory of Mühlberg Leone Leoni

-

Charles V, Victory of Mühlberg Leone Leoni
Leone Leoni – ABOUT 1550
1509-1590

--

Pompeo Leoni (1533-1608)
Philip II
Bronze, 1550
Museo del Prado, Madrid

-

Philip II, by Pompeo Leoni

-

THE EMPEROR CHARLES V SUBDUING RAGE

LEONE LEONI (1509-1590) AND POMPEO LEONI (1533-1608)
Bronze (251 cms. in height)
Italian School. Renaissance
16th Century
Hall 1, Prado Museum, Madrid, Spain
This bronze is one of the most beautiful pieces of Renaissance Statuary. The two figures rise up over a plynth, around the circumference of which is the inscription “Caesaris virtute domitus furor” (Rage dominated by Caesar’s valour). On the same plynth, to the left, there is another inscripition referring to the piece`s creators. In Latin it reads “Leone, the father, and Pompeo, the son, natives of Arezzo, made this 1564″. It is probable that it was actually Leone who made it and that his son only helped in its firing. Celebrated in this sculptural group is a victory of the imperial troops; some argue that it refers to the conquest of Tunis, others that it is the Battle of Mühlberg against the Protestants. In the figure of the emperor the clothing is removable, revealing a nude worked in the fashion of the old deified Roman emperors. In his right hand he carries a lance that has felled the body of his vanquished foe, while in his left he has a sword, the hilt of which is shaped like an eagle’s head.

 

-

'Estatua orante del Duque de Lerma'. Pompeo Leoni y taller

-

Statue of the Duke of Lerma at prayer. Pompeo Leoni and workshop, 1608.

-

Statue of the Duchess of Lerma at prayer. Pompeo Leoni and workshop, 1608.

-

Detail. Statue of the Duchess of Lerma at prayer. Pompeo Leoni and workshop, 1608.

-

Statues of the Duke and Duchess of Lerma at prayer

Pompeo Leoni and workshop, 1608.

Born in Milan around 1530, the sculptor, medallist and painter, Pompeo Leoni, had his father Leone Leoni as his first maestro. His wide culture and his love of ancient times helped him to become an artist of great technical quality and constant concern for the theoretical aspects (on perspective or composition). His magnificent treatment of bronze and marble, as well as his idealistic classicism are features which, although inherited from his father, Pompeo Leoni was to refine into his own very personal style.

The appointment of the Leoni father and son duo as Court sculptors to the Emperor Charles V and later of King Philip lI, and the definitive settlement of Pompeo in Spain brought about the creation of a Spanish courtly school defined by their own works and those of their Spanish, Italian and Flemish disciples, characterized by magnificent craftsmanship, elegance in the compositions and majestic solemnity in the characters.

From the earliest commissions to Leone Leoni made by King Charles V, Pompeo collaborated actively with his father, and his name appears in the royal payroll from 1557. After the king abdicated and returned to Spain, only Pompeo came with him to this country, serving the royal family for over fifty years, although the collaboration with his father in the works for the basilica of El Escorial was always intense. When Leone died in 1590, Pompeo was entrusted to complete in Madrid the impressive royal tombs in the monastery at El Escorial with the practical assistance of collaborators such as his son Miguel Ángel or the Italians Baltasar Mariano and Millán Vimercado. In the last few years of his life, until his death in Madrid in 1608, he was contracted for many works in wood, generally in company with Spanish sculptors, although his most important enterprise was to design the tombs for the Duke and Duchess of Lerma in the convent of Saint Paul in Valladolid.

These two magnificent sculptures representing the first Duke of Lerma, Francisco Gómez de Sandoval y Rojas, and his wife, Catalina de la Cerda, bring immediately to mind the memory of the royal tombs in El Escorial. This ambitious protégé of King Philip III seems in effect to wish to rival the sovereigns themselves by commissioning these sumptuous effigies for his tomb, taking advantage of the installation of the Royal Court in Valladolid and calling in Pompeo Leoni from Madrid at the time, to take control of their supervision in 1601.

Pompeo moved to Valladolid with his assistants Millán Vimercado and Baltasar Mariano who prepared the plaster and moulds following the models designed by the maestro, after which the items were taken to Madrid awaiting the final decision of the Duke before the casting in hot-gilt fine bronze. The Duke opted to accept the offer presented by the sculptor in silver and gold Juan de Arfe y Villafañe, amounting to 10,000 ducats (as opposed to the 12,000 ducats asked for by Pompeo himself), and the work was completed following the models of Leoni, except for the Duchess’s head which had not met with the Duke’s approval.

Juan de Arfe died in 1603 without having completed the items and a few months later so did the Duchess, who was thus unable to see her effigy finished. The Duke then had to call in another silversmith, Lesmes Fernández del Moral (Arfe’s son-in-law and a regular collaborator), and request the assistance of Pompeo to ensure the final quality. The sculptures were not completed until 1607 and then placed in the marble and jasper niche prepared in 1602 on the Gospel side of the main chapel in Saint Paul’s.

The two figures are shown kneeling solemnly in an attitude of prayer, with fine clothes and other items displaying their earthly condition. The Duke, in a suit of armour, is cloaked in a cape lined with ermine and a muzzetta fastened to reveal on his chest the cross of the Order of Saint James, originally adorned with hard stones, and a small ruff so as not to prevent his face from being seen from the floor of the church. The duchess, on a richly decorated cushion imitating brocade, is dressed in a full skirt with pointed sleeves, a mantle of ermine on the outside, elegant headdress and several jewels that originally also had incrustations of sundry stones. The two images are a true reflection of art placed at the disposal of power, and the desire to overcome death through fame, perpetuating the lineage over the majority of men.

Leoni, Pompeo
(b. 1533, d. 1608, Madrid)
Italian sculptor, son of Leone Leoni. He moved to Spain in about 1556 to gave the finishing touches to his fathers sculptures for the emperor. The most important was a group of 27 bronze statues (finished 1582) for the high altar of the Escorial. Pompeo executed several tombs in Spain on his own account, and was, like his father, a goldsmith and medallist. Again like his father, he had a dangerous brush with authority, being briefly imprisoned by the inquisition.

-

Royal Prussian Academy of Arts, Berlin Königlich-Preußische Akademie der Künste, Sculpture derived from Greek Hellenistic sculpture, & Friedrich Wilhelm Eugen Döll.Page#2

9
Louise von Mecklenburg-Strelitz, königin von Preussen, ROYAL CONSORT (Prussia), BORN 10 Mar 1776, Hannover - DIED 19 Jul 1810, Hohenzieritz (castle near Neustrelitz)REAL NAME Louise Auguste Wilhelmine Amalie, GRAVE LOCATION Berlin: Mausoleum Charlottenburg, Sculptor Christian Rauch

Louise von Mecklenburg-Strelitz, königin von Preussen, ROYAL CONSORT (Prussia), BORN 10 Mar 1776, Hannover - DIED 19 Jul 1810, Hohenzieritz (castle near Neustrelitz)REAL NAME Louise Auguste Wilhelmine Amalie, GRAVE LOCATION Berlin: Mausoleum Charlottenburg, Sculptor Christian Rauch

Louise von Mecklenburg-Strelitz, königin von Preussen, Daughter of Karl I, Duke of Mecklenburg-Strelitz. In 1793 she married crown prince Friedrich Wilhelm of Prussia, who became king Friedrich Wilhelm III in 1797, The monument for queen Louise of Prussia in Mausoleum of the Schlosspark at Charlottenburg, Berlin. It was created by C.D. Rauch
Louise von Mecklenburg-Strelitz, königin von Preussen, Daughter of Karl I, Duke of Mecklenburg-Strelitz. In 1793 she married crown prince Friedrich Wilhelm of Prussia, who became king Friedrich Wilhelm III in 1797, The monument for queen Louise of Prussia in Mausoleum of the Schlosspark at Charlottenburg, Berlin. It was created by C.D. Rauch
Louise von Mecklenburg-Strelitz, königin von Preussen Prussia Berlin, Mausoleum of the Schlosspark at Charlottenburg, Berlin, sculpted Christian Rauch
Louise von Mecklenburg-Strelitz, königin von Preussen Prussia Berlin, Mausoleum of the Schlosspark at Charlottenburg, Berlin, sculpted Christian Rauch
Christian Friedrich Tieck, German, 1776-1851,Sculptor Christian Rauch, Plaster cast. Original modelled in 1816-18, Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek, Copenhagen, Denmark
Christian Friedrich Tieck, German, 1776-1851,Sculptor Christian Rauch, Plaster cast. Original modelled in 1816-18, Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek, Copenhagen, Denmark
Field Marshal Blücher,  Plaster cast. Original modelled 1815, Christian Daniel Rauch
Field Marshal Blücher, Plaster cast. Original modelled 1815, Christian Daniel Rauch
C D Rauch Bust of Goethe, Marble, Leipzig, Germany
C D Rauch Bust of Goethe, Marble, Leipzig, Germany
C D Rauch, Bust of Goethe, Marble, Leipzig, Germany

C D Rauch, Bust of Goethe, Marble, Leipzig, Germany

C D Rauch, Bust of Geothe, marble, Leipzig
C D Rauch, Bust of Geothe, marble, Leipzig
C D Rauch, Bust of Geothe, Marble, Leipzig
C D Rauch, Bust of Geothe, Marble, Leipzig
Friedrich Wilhelm Eugen Döll -  Gustavus Adolphus of Sweden on mounted Horse, Bronze
Friedrich Wilhelm Eugen Döll – Gustavus Adolphus of Sweden on mounted Horse, BronzeFriedrich Gilly-Herme von Gottfried SchadowC D Rauch, Bust of Geothe, Leipzig
Royal Prussian Academy of Arts, Berlin Königlich-Preußische Akademie der Künste,
The list of honorary members: Andreas Shluter, Daniel Chodowiecki, Asmus Carstens, Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, Johann Gottfried Herder, Karl Friederich Schinkel, Johann Gottfried Schadow, Felix Mendelssohn Bartholdy,
The background in the German speaking regions for the opening of academies of art started with informal drawing groups that called themselves academies, as was the custom in Italy from the Renaissance through until the formation of the French academy model that slowly was adopted into the academy structure in Europe. These drawing academies were at first most similar to gentleman’s clubs where artist met to draw the life model. Some of these academies early on had a certain amount of plaster casts of Greek antique sculpture available for sculpture, and drawing copies. Assistants were sometimes given lessons by one or more of the member artist of the academy. Usually this was limited to one or several days out of the week. An early more advanced example of an Academy, though not called such at this time period, described by Vasari, was the one of Lorenzo the Magnificent who appointed the sculptor Bertoldo to direct for young painters, and sculptors of great talent. Apprentices were sent from Domenico Ghirlandajo, such as Michelangelo. The academy required the full time of the young apprentice without the menial jobs of the guild system apprentice working ones way up the ladder. Adriean de Vries’ starting in 1601 was the court sculptor of Emperor Rudolf II, Holy Roman Emperor of the Austro-Hingarian Empire. He became court sculptor in 1601. Among the art collection of Emperor Rudolf II, which was the largest in Europe of the time period, was Adriean de Vries’ bronze relief representing Rudolf II’s 1585 imperial decree that painting should be considered among the liberal arts, and not of the guild craftsmen. Sculpture modern, and of Greek antique was the basis of the education from the collection of the Medici. Access to plaster cast collections was an important aspect of the instruction in the ateliers, private studios of artists, and especially the academies. Since the plaster casts of Greek antique sculpture were expensive, the availability of these was limited until the state supported financially, and philosophically the academy institutions.    
.  The painter, and student of Honthorst at Utrecht, Joachim von Sandrart (1606 – 1688), published his book, “Deutsche Akademie” on the history of German artists, he started the first German academy in 1674 / 1675 in Nuremberg, the Academie der Kunstliebenden, based on his teacher Gerard (Gerrit) van Hornthorst’s (1592 – 1656) Dutch Caravaggisti,  Utrecht studio. Sandrart’s academy was similar to the Karel van Manders’ (1548 – 1606), Harlem academy. The academy was primarily a place to attend life drawing, and had a large number of amateurs. The Nuremberg academy though was less important as the eighteenth century progressed. A student of Sandrart, Joh started a similar academy in Augsburg which was official in 1710 with two directors, one Lutheran, and one Catholic. The Augsburg Academy started as a serious academy in 1779. Stuttgart opened an academy of art as a government academy taken over from the private academy in 1762. The Munich academy of art opened in 1770, but wasn’t a functioning academy with a full curriculum until 1801. Düsseldorf opened an academy in 1762 as a school of drawing. In 1773, the academy became the Earl of Palatine’s Academy of Painting, Sculpture and Architecture. During the Napoleonic Wars, the Earl of Palentine’s art collection was inherited by the Wittelsbach family and moved to Munich, the Prussian government had annexed the Düsseldorf region after Napoleon had surrendered, and in 1819 changed the academy into the Royal Arts Academy of Düsseldorf. Dresden started its first academy in the 1680s under the private academy of Samuel Bottschild, (1641 – 1706), and in 1697 by a student of Bottschild, Heinrich Christoph Fehling (1654 – 1725). The academy became official in 1705 with reorganization under Elector Augustus the Strong (Frederick Augustus I, Elector of Saxony and King of Poland), (1670 – 1733), again this academy was mostly concerned with life drawing sessions, now with an annual grant to cover the life model costs. In 1750 / 1763 was the reopening of the academy, with the first time that the Dresden Academy had actual professors, and a curriculum. In Karlsruhe the “Handwerkerschule” opened in 1770, the Kunsthochschule started in 1854, as the “Grand Ducal Baden Karlsruhe School of Art”. In Frankfurt am Main an Academy opened in 1780, Städelschule ‘Städelsches Kunstinstitut’ and was founded in 1817 by Johann Friederich Städel. Vienna started an academy similar to the Dresden academy in 1692 / 1705, under Joseph I (1678 – 1711), Holy Roman Emperor, King of Bohemia, King of Hungary, King of the Romans, under the Imperial court artist Peter Strudel von Strudendorff, a Tyrolean sculptor, (1660 – 1714). Jacob van Schuppen (1670 – 1751) an Austrian painter, became the director in 1725 during the reign of Emporer Karl VI, of the Imperial and Royal Court Academy of painters, sculptors and architecture. Jacob van Schuppen was the nephew of Nicolas de Largillière (1656 – 1746), in 1730, Schuppen taught Adam Friedrich Oeser (1717 – 1799). Another period started in 1751, with the reformation under Empress Maria Theresa (1717 – 1780), and then in 1772 there were further reforms under Chancellor Wenzel Anton Graf Kuntz.     
The Berlin Academy started in 1690 to 1697 based on the Paris Academy education system. The building was designed by the architect Johann Arnold Nering, (1659 – 1695), and was located on Unter den Linden Strasse. Andreas Schlüter (1660 – 1714) was one of the important early influences of the formation of the Academy from 1699 onwards. The initial Berlin Maler – oder Bildhauer Academie, painters, and sculptors academy system consisted of a high school of art, or university of art based on the academies of Rome, and Paris. The first director of the Berlin academy, as well as in charge of the tapestry workshops, was Joseph Werner (1637 – 1710), previously the miniaturist painter to Louis XIX. He had been in Paris when the Academie Royale was set up under the direction of Jean-Baptiste Colbert (1619 – 1683). The academy was the first in Germany to set up a full structure with a protector, vice-protector, director, four rectors – one of whom was Andreas Schlüter, with their  Adjuncti, professors, Academici, Honorari, amateur, Assecores, prizes and reception pieces, lectures on paintings in the electoral collection, and the exemption of members from the guilds. The artist departed from the guilds in Renaissance Italy in order to achieve a higher status in society equal to the architect. The previous situation of artist’s mandatory association within the guild system limited independent development of the artist, and limited the amount the artist might get paid depending on how many heads, figures, hands, etc. might have been in a painting, or sculpture. This would be related to a brick layer in how many bricks were laid to determine the fee for his labor. Much of the public image projected of the Renaissance artist was to disassociate hard labor from the artwork produced, and leave the impression of a magical process, to assist with the separation from the guild. One of the early professors in the Berlin academy was Augustin Terwesten, (1649 – 1711), who made a series of drawings (collection, Berlin Akademie der Künste), depicting the courses being taught in the rooms of the Berlin Academy. Depicted are the courses for drawing from plaster casts of antique, original drawings, drawing from drawings, anatomy, and perspective. Augustinus Terwesten had been a founding member of the academy in den Hague. Jacob van Schuppen, (1670 – 1751), a pupil of Nicolas de Largilliere, (1656 – 1746), and a member of the Paris academy initiated the first serious academy for Austria in 1735, making the Austrian academy one of the top academies in Europe. Most of the prominent German sculptors went to Vienna to study during the eighteenth century since with Frederick William I, the Berlin academy lost support. Goethe’s Leipzig mentor Adam Friederich Oeser, (1717 – 1799), an advocate of Winckelmann’s for the place of Greek antique art, was the drawing teacher of Johann Wolfgang Goethe, Oeser was a student at the Vienna academy, he moved to Leipzig in 1759, and became the director at the Leipzig Academy in 1764.    
    In 1743 a fire destroyed the Academy building. The Academy was primarily under the influence of the Dutch school of art. Since 1756 Rode was a member of the Berlin Academy of Arts. During the directorship under Blaise Le Sueur (1716 – 1783), instruction was at his residence with just an elementary drawing, Le Sueur, and a mathematics instructor. Le Sueur made a reputation for not involving himself with much of the affairs of the academy. In 1783 Christian Bernhard Rode (1725 – 1797), historical painter for Frederick the Great, was appointed Director of the Berlin Academy as successor to Le Sueur. The new building of the Berlin academy was finished in 1786. Rode’s Berlin Academy friend Daniel Chodowiecki (1726 – 1801) painter, printmaker, supported the nomination. King Friedrich Wilhelm I (1688 – 1740), had little interest in art and culture, and so the investment in the Berlin Academy had fallen into disrepair. The Berlin Academy during Kaiser Frederick II (Frederick the Great) (1712 – 1786), was based almost exclusively on French models. Rode was unable to alter the French influence, and it was next under Chodowiecki as Director of the Berlin Academy that the reform of 1790, under the reign of Friederich Wilhelm II (1744 – 1797), took place.  The last Fleming was Bernhardt Rode as Director of the Academy in 1783. In 1786 the building was restored, and the Academy refurnished with plaster casts, engravings, and drawings. A change of the education system was established by Daniel Nicholas Chodowiecki starting in 1786 / 1797 as director, after Rode’s death in 1797, and then by Gottfried Schadow as director of the Berlin Academy in 1816. As the acting director Johann Gottfried Schadow (1764 – 1850), brought in an expanded antique cast collection, as well as setting up the Rome Prize. Many of the Academies under the state guidance had seen a practical implementation of teaching the craft trade pupils within the academy system for the advancement of commerce, and manufacture within their countries. This new purpose of the academy for art as well as the trades shows up during the expansion of the curriculum, and more serious structure of the academies starting after 1750. The Vienna academy director and painter Friedrich Heinrich Füger (1751 – 1818), warned not to lose sight of the foremost task of an academy to maintain, and further the grand style. As director of “Kultus” department of the Prussian Ministry of the Interior since 1809, Wilhelm von Humbolt, Friedrich Wilhelm Christian Karl Ferdinand Freiherr von Humboldt (1767 – 1835), part of the Goethe Weimar group, took out the “Mechanic Sciences” from the “Berlin Royal Academy of Arts and Mechanic Sciences”.
Jean-Pierre-Antoine Tassaert (Antwerp 1727 — Berlin 1788) was influenced by Greek antique, as well as the French sculptor Etienne-maurice Falconnet, sculptor (1716 – 1791). He went to Paris as a young man to work in the atelier of Michel-Ange Slodtz, french sculptor (René-Michel Slodtz, 1705 – 1764) he lived in Paris for a decade, and then came to Berlin as the court sculptor to Kaiser Frederick II (Frederick the Great).  J.P.A. Tassaert made sculptures for Potsdam, and directed the courses in sculpture at the Academy, where his major student and successor was Johann Gottfried Schadow.  Schadow was an adherent of the school of Classicism along with Antonio Canova (1757 – 1822), and the most distinguished Swedish classicist sculptor J. T. Sergell (1736-1813), but with a keener understanding of shape orientation in his sculpture than Canova, which for Schadow was more properly influenced by Greek antique sculpture, and Winckelmann’s writing on antique. With Winckelmann’s quote as an example “ easier to discover the beauty of Greek statues than the beauty of nature….Imitating them will teach us how to become wise without loss of time”. This would also relate to the underlying idea of the French academy “Académie de peinture et de sculpture, started under Cardinal Mazarin (1585 – 1642), in 1648, with Jean-Baptiste Colbert (1619 – 1683) who reorganized the Academy of Painting and Sculpture which Cardinal Richelieu had established. Winckelmann’s student the sculptor Johannes Wiedewelt (1731 – 1802) (“Thoughts on Taste in the Arts in General”), taught at the Copenhagen academy, and when in Rome starting in 1754, among his associates were the German painter Anton Raphael Mengs, Italian – Pompeo Batoni, Giovanni Battista Piranesi, and German archeologist and art theorist Johann Joachim Winckelmann who arrived in Rome 1755. Johannes Wiedewelt started sculpture under the advice of French Academy graduate sculptor Jacques François Joseph Saly (1717 – 1776), then the director, and sculpture professor at the Danish Academy of Art. Among Wiedewelt’s students were Nikolaj Abraham Abildgaard, (1743 – 1809), future Director of the Danish Academy, Alexander Trippel (1744 – 1793), the sculptor, – later started a private academy in Rome, {Gottfied Schadow (1764 – 1850), and Johann Jakob Schmid (1759 – 1798) worked with Trippel, as well as Goethe learned much of his understanding of ancient art from Alexander Trippel}, J. H. W. Tischbein, (1751 – 1829) – later the director of the Naples Academy, Franz Anton Zauner (1746 – 1822), – before teaching, and director at the Vienna academy, Johann Heinrich von Dannecker (1758 – 1841), – before founding, and as director of the Stuttgart Academy, and Bertel Thorvaldsen, (1770 – 1844). The first public exhibition of art in Prussia occurred in 1786. This date was the institution of the Age of Enlightenment under King (Kaiser) Friedirich Wilhelm II (1744 – 1797), for the modernization of Prussia. Schadow made an equestrian statue of Frederick the Great for the town Stettin. Initially the equestrian statue of Frederick the Great was intended as more neo-Classical with a Roman motif in the clothes of the statue, but instead included a contemporary Prussian look. His statue of Leopold of Dessau (1676 – 1747), is in Prussian attire, but the reliefs on the pedestal are costumed in neo-Classical Roman style. The beginning of a more practical depiction in sculpture of the time period, and national cultural context referred to as “Patriotic” style was in the early stages at this time of Schadow in the German lands, especially Prussia. Some of Schadow’s additional important sculpture works were the Quadriga of Victory over the Brandenburger Thor at Berlin; his Nymph awaking out of Sleep; and the double figure portrait of Prinzessinnen Luise und Frederike von Preußen (1797). Schadow produced drawings after antique sculpture, portraits, designs for monuments, representations of the stages in life for men and women, the theory of canons, as well as the sexes in comparison to each other for scale, proportion, and type, and animal studies which he published as “Polyklet”, or from the masses of the person; and Polykleitos, or guide to the Proportions of the Humanly form and “National Physiognomy”. These kinds of artistic guides were common from the early Renaissance through the mid nineteenth century. Schadow’s published guide was the first to give proportion scale with measured ruler units of inches, and feet, instead of just interrelationships of the parts in relative scale. He based his analysis on multiple life models, as well as what were the preferred Greek sculptures of the time. The majority of the drawings is rather simplistic and crude, but gives the idea of part of the establishment of the Berlin Academy curriculum, and the philosophy so important to establishing a more rigorous approach to the sculpture related to Greek antique. The use of caliper measurements to make an analysis of scale, and measured proportion is shown in many instances of manuals, as well as art of the earlier time periods, as in the Carracci studio of Bologna, and Rome in the 16th., and early 17th. Century. Another example of many made in the past is the: “Anatomie du gladiateur combattant, applicable aux beaux arts…”, Paris, 1812. Two-layer copperplate engraving, color. Jean-Galbert Salvage, (1770-1813), A military doctor of the Napoleonic era, Salvage based his drawings on dissections of soldiers “killed in duels, in their prime.” For this study of the Borghese Gladiator, an ancient Greek statue, he arranged his cadavers in the same pose as the sculpture and meticulously worked out the skeletal and muscular anatomy. Anatomical studies of important classical sculptures constituted a genre within fine art. Another is the: “Tabulae Sceleti e Musculorum Corporis Humani”, (London, 1749). Copperplate engraving with etching. Bernhard Siegfried Albinus, (1697-1770), [anatomist], Jan Wandelaar, (1690-1759), [artist], Albinus intended his figures to exemplify ideal humanity and an ideal of anatomical illustration. The cadaver, carefully chosen for its close approximation to classical ideals of proportion, stands with guardian angel hovering behind against a painterly backdrop. Another is the Italian work of: “Elementi di anatomia fisiologica applicata alle belle arti figurative”, Turin, 1837-39. Lithograph., Francesco Bertinatti, (fl. mid-1800s), [anatomist], Mecco Leone, [artist], The anatomical studies for real, imaginary and prospective sculptures and paintings became a genre in its own right in the early and middle decades of the 19th century. Another by the Roman work: “Anatomia per uso et intelligenza del disegno ricercata…”, Rome, 1691. Copperplate engraving., Bernardino Genga, (1636?-1734?), [anatomist], Charles Errard, (1609?-1689), [artist], The association between death and anatomy continued in art anatomy, even as it waned in medical texts. Genga, a Roman anatomist, specialized in studies of classical sculptures. Errard, court painter to Louis XIV, helped found the Académie Royale de Peinture and was first Director of the Académie de France in Rome. Another representation of anatomical text is the: “Ontleding des menschelyken lichaams…”, Amsterdam, 1690. Copperplate engraving with etching. Govard Bidloo, (1649-1713), [anatomist], Gérard de Lairesse, (1640-1711), [artist], This stark dissection—with ragged flesh fully displayed and hands bound with a cord—signals a commitment to a higher level of realism. To our eyes, the picture may suggest a distressing indifference to, or even pleasure in, human suffering. Bidloo’s realistic anatomy has affinities to trompe loeil and still-life, two popular genres of 17th-century Netherlandish painting that often featured bones and other symbols of death. Another the Renaissance anatomy text of: “De Humani Corporis Fabrica…”, Basel, 1543. Woodcut., Andreas Vesalius, (1514-1564), [anatomist], Stephen van Calcar and the Workshop of Titian, [artists], Vesalius sought to make illustrations that were true to nature, but many of his figures conform to classical ideals of beauty and proportion, and stand in classical poses. {These anatomical pictures and text are from the National Institute of Health, Bethesda, Md., U.S.}
 Johann Gottfried Schadow’s main students were Christian Friedrich Tieck (1776–1851) who spent fourteen years in Rome, and worked on the sculpture for the Royal Theatre of Berlin; Rudolph Schadow (1786–1822) son of Johann Gottfried Schadow, made ideal genre sculpture, Wilhelm von Schadow-Godenhaus (1788–1862), became well known as a painter, and became the director of the Dusseldorf Academy in 1826; Christian Daniel Rauch (1777-1857), with his most famous work being the monument of Queen Louise at the Mausoleum at Charlottenburg; General Scharnhorst statue, Berlin; General Bulow, Berlin; Albrecht Dürer, Nuremberg; Blucher monument, Breslau, made after a design by Schadow; Maximilian I., Munich; statue of Frederick the Great, Berlin, 1839 to 1851; and his Goethe bust, Leipzig. When Rauch was thirteen years old, he began his five year study with the sculptor Friedrich Valentin, sculptor (1752 – 1819). He was made an assistant from 1795-1797 to the sculptor and academy professor Johann Christian Ruhl, sculptor (1764 – 1842) in Kassel. Rauch became Gottfried Schadow’s official assistant in 1803, modeling reliefs after sketches made by Gottfried Schadow.
 
Schadow’s most prominent student was Christian Daniel Rauch (1777 – 1857). C.D. Rauch went further into the examination, and influence of Greek antique sculpture within his own development, as well as the influence of Wilhelm von Humboldt (1767 – 1835), Bertel Thorvaldsen (1770 – 1844), and the writings of Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749 – 1832). Rauch established the maturity of intent, procedure and technique for the Berlin Academy that was the main influence in the German regions for several generations.  
Relevant with the later period of this art training, and production was the installment of the The Pergamum Altar, and earlier further extensive Greek Hellenistic sculpture (or Greco Roman copies of Hellenistic Greek sculpture), during then Wilhelminian Germany for the modernization of Prussia. Dresden and it’s collections of Greek sculpture were started earlier in the seventeenth, and eighteenth century. The cross pollination between the various German speaking region academies, as well as the pertinent writings, and personalities on Classicism came to a high sophistication at the Berlin, Dusseldorf, Munich, Dresden, and Vienna academies at the end of the eighteenth century, up until the later nineteenth century. The plaster cast collection of Greek antique in Dresden numbered over five thousand, in Berlin the number was over seven thousand plaster casts of antique, the same type of antique large collections were at Dusseldorf, Munich, and Vienna. Kaiser Wilhelm I (1797 – 1888), and Kaiser Wilhelm II (1859 – 1941) supported traditions of European art that evolved from the influence of Greek antique, and refused the growing degenerate decline in art of the modern. Kaiser Wilhelm II’s main counsel was the painter, and Director of the Academy, Anton von Werner (1843-1915). The following generations were the most prominent sculptors associated with the Academy of Berlin from Rauch’s instruction: Drake, Blaser, Schievelbein, Kiss, Wolff, Shaper. Johann Friedrich Drake (18o5 – 1882) is represented with his equestrian statue of Kaiser Wilhelm I. at Cologne, and in his sculptures of Rauch and Schinkel at Berlin. Gustav Bläser (1813–1874) of Cologne sculpted the Francke monument at Magdeburg. Friedrich Hermann Schievelbein (1817—1867) made the sculpture group Pallas instructing a youth on the use of the spear, placed on the palace bridge in Berlin. Schievelbein’s frieze of the Destruction of Pompeii, Nues Museum, was influenced by the frieze of the Apollo Temple at Phigaleia. August Kiss (1804—1865), predominantly sculpted animals in bronze, best known for his Mounted Amazon fighting a Tiger, front steps of the Alte Museum at Berlin. Albert Wolff (1814 – 1892), being a direct line from Rauch. Albert Wolff carried more closely to Rauch in content, and style, The main students of Albert Wolff were Reinhold Begas (1831 – 1911), straddled the line between weaker modern influences of the French sculpture school from the nineteenth century Romantic mixed with his inherited content from Rauch, and the mostly unfortunate influence from Bernini’s sculpture, branded Wilhemian Neo-Baroque / WilhelminischerNeubarock. Albert Wolff’s other student Fritz Shaper (1841 – 1919) carried more closely the tradition of the German school from Rauch. Ernst Herter (1846 – 1917) was most influenced and involved in Greek antique, Neo-Hellenistic, more than Neo-Baroque. Herter received an award to study in Copenhagen where it looks like he may have encountered Andreas Kolberg’s (1817 1869) sculpture, studied at the Academy of Arts in Berlin and later as an apprentice of  Ferdinand August Fischer, Gustav Blaeser and Albert Wolff as well.  The Berliner Secession formed in 1898 with Walter Leistikow as the main modernist leader. The modern period was solidified at the period of the November Revolution with the takeover by the “degenerate” (as referred by the traditionalists influenced by Classical, and Hellenistic Greek sculpture) artist of the contemporary modernists. Some of the Secession artists were Ernst Barlach, Lovis Corinth, Georg Kolbe, Kathy Kollwitz, and Wilhelm Lehnbruch. There was an attempt to rid the Academy of the modernist camp in 1933, and effective in 1937 with the Gleichschaltung (Gleichschaltung: n., the standardization of political, economic, and social institutions as carried out in authoritarian states.) of the Nazi’s. The merits of earlier art from the Greek antique, as well as the 19th. and late 18th. Century in Prussia was missing in this period of the 1930s, and 1940s. The art that was reflected in this war period of the Nazi’s had more to do with the Bauhaus realism, and late 19th. Century modernism post Classical, and post Hellenistic influenced art. This Bauhaus influence, and German modernist schools were the larger influence on Russian propaganda sculpture of the Soviets, and later Chinese Communists. , – (P. Brad Parker)
Some of the sculptors of note from the Academy:
Christian Daniel Rauch, – sculptor, , Potsdam, Prussia, Germany, – (*1777 in Arolsen in Hessen; †1857 in Dresden) was one of the most important and most successful sculptors of the German Classicism. He was a pupil of Johann Gottfried Schadow.
When Rauch was thirteen years old, he began his five year study with the sculptor Friedrich Valentin. He was made an assistant from 1795-1797 to the sculptor and academy professor Johann Christian Ruhl in Kassel.
Rauch became Gottfried Schadow’s official assistant in 1803, modeling reliefs after sketches made by Gottfried Schadow. Gottfried Schadow  had been the director of the Berlin Royal Academy sculpture workshop for twenty four years when Rauch was accepted as his assistant. Rauch read works of Goethe and Schiller which were the prominent sources of the Classicism of the period.
 
In 1804 under Frederich William III, Rauch was granted an annual scholarship of 125 Talern, and twelve groschens for a six year period of study in Italy. In Rome he befriended Antonio Canova, and Bertel Thorvaldsen. In 1809 Rauch had his annual scholarship increased to 400 Taler.
After William of Humboldt supported it, Rauch in the autumn 1810 received a commission order to Prussian king Friedrich William III., because his 36 year old wife Luise had died. Thorwaldsen favoured Rauch for the commission without competition for the tomb, and in a similar way later Rauch favored his friend and favorite pupil Ernst Rietschel in the commission for the Weimar Goethe-Schiller monuments.
Rauch lived alternating between Rome and Carrara, together with Friedrich Tieck, another pupil of Gottfried Schadow. Rauch from the distance of Italy experienced the fall of Prussia as well as the war of liberation.
Beside many prince and field gentleman statues he made also bronze and marble busts of Goethe, and Dürer, also busts of famous Germans were made for Walhalla (Parthenon inspired memorial place) in Regensburg.
Sculpture Works: Christian Daniel Rauch:
The married couple Niebuhr, marble relief in the old persons cemetery, Bonn
Adelheid of Humbold as Psyche, seated, marble statue, Rome 1810
Grave monument of the Luise of Prussia (Berlin, in the Mausoleum in Charlottenburg), 1815, marble.
Marble statues of Bülow, and Blücher beside Schinkels in Berlin, 1819
life-size Goethe bust, 1820
Monument A.H. Franckes , Saale, 1825-1828
Monument for Friedrich of Kleist for Merseburg, 1825/26  
  • Goethe, Statuette, 1828
  • Statues of the Polish princes Mieczyslaw and Boleslaw for the Posener cathedral, 1841
  • Work for the Walhalla (with Danube-baptize): Büsten of Raphael Mengs (1808), Hans Sachs, van Dyck, admiral Tromp, Martin beautiful (1813), Snyders (1814), Blücher (1817), count Diebitsch Sabalkansky (1830), crowd refuge (1831), Dürer (1837) and 6 Victorien (2 sitting, 4 standing)
  • sitting statue max of Joseph I., Erzgusss of J.B. Stieglmair (1825/35)
  • Dürer in Nuremberg (1830/1840), ore casting of J.D. Burgschmiet
  • Model for Dürer monument in Nuremberg, 1849, of Jakob Daniel Burgschmiet 1849 in bronze poured.

     Sarcophagus figure of Friedrich William III., Berlin, 1846

  • ·         Equestrian Statue of King Frederick II of Prussia (Frederick the Great), Unter der Linden, in Berlin 1851  
  • 1864 poured of Hermann Gladenbeck, lost after WWII was over in 1945 when the Soviet Union bombed to rubble the capitol of East Prussia – Königsberg,  / In 1992 Replaced the statue of Immanuel Kant for Kings Castle by Marion Dönhoff in Käliningrad, – not the same Rauch sculpture 
  • Iron statues of two lying lions in Luebeck before the Holsten Gate
  • Moses in Prayer, supported of the high priests Aaron and Hur, group of marbles at the Church of Peace (Friedenskirche) in Potsdam 
  • Rauch school

By the large number of his pupils Rauch had a large and direct influence on the artists of its time. Some of his pupils that became prominent artists: Friedrich Drake, who designed the Berlin’s SiegessäuleVictory Column, and Ernst Rietschel , who created the Goethe Schiller monument in Weimar, Albert Wolff.
 
Sculptors below are from the beginning of the mid 17th. century through the18th century up to the period of Rauch. The styles represented by a few of the sculptors below give some context to Rauch arriving to his sculpture content from the European tradition. Thorvaldsen, Canova, Flaxman, etc… were in the basic same group of neo-Classical as Rauch. Rauch has a more sophisticated, and solid sculpture than Canova, or Flaxman, as well as better than most of Thorvaldsen’s work. None of these four sculptors are particularly noteworthy for their figure sculpture. Rauch was a great portrait / bust sculptor, but his figure sculpture was of a less successful quality. Houdon is the older generation, and has significant content from Greek Hellenistic sculpture in his bust work, which is only approached of these four sculptors mentioned here by the best work of Rauch, and to a lesser degree by Thorvaldsen. The sculptors below are not a full representation of all that could be included. Houdon has a whole page to his work, with some of his teacher Pigalle included, toward the last few pages of this blog. More will be included as commentary on these works and sculptors as I return throughout the blog, as time allows. } Blogger PBP
 
 
Christian Daniel Rauch, – sculptor, , Goethe, Leipzig, Sachsen, Germany, – (* 2 January 1777 in Arolsen in Hessen; † 3 December 1857 in Dresden) was one of the most important and most successful sculptors of the German classicism. He was a pupil of Johann Gottfried Schadow
 
///////
Rauch, Christian Daniel
German, 1777-1857
Field Marshal Blücher
Plaster cast. Original modelled 1815.
Plaster, H. 58.5 cm,

 
Signature/Inscription: Iscription: FUERST BLUECHER VON WAHLSTADT, and verso: Nach dem Leben v: Chr:Rauch im J:1815 im A. (?)Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek, Copenhagen, Denmark
//////
 Tieck, Christian Friedrich
German, 1776-1851
The Sculptor Christian Rauch
Plaster cast. Original modelled in 1816-18.
Plaster, H. 67 cm,
Signature/Inscription: Inscription on the front of the base: CHR:RAUCH, plus, on the back, Fried. Tieck. 23 April 1818.
Ny Carlsberg Glyptotek, Copenhagen, Denmark
//////////
Louise von Mecklenburg-Strelitz, königin von Preussen
 
ROYAL CONSORT (Prussia) 
BORN 10 Mar 1776, Hannover – DIED 19 Jul 1810, Hohenzieritz (castle near Neustrelitz)
REAL NAME Louise Auguste Wilhelmine Amalie
GRAVE LOCATION Berlin: Mausoleum Charlottenburg, Berlin 
Daughter of Karl I, Duke of Mecklenburg-Strelitz. In 1793 she married crown prince Friedrich Wilhelm of Prussia, who became king Friedrich Wilhelm III in 1797. They had nine children, among them the future emperor Wilhelm I.
After the battle of Jena they fled to Königsberg and then to Memel. Louise visited the French quarters at Tilsit in 1807, hoping to obtain better conditions for Prussia. She didn’t succeed, but it was said that this was only because her husband broke in impatiently on her conversation with the emperor before the latter gave in. It is certain that her fearless encounter with the emperor impressed many and added to her popularity.
In 1809 she returned to Berlin. She was serioulsly ill in the summer of 1809. In June, 1810 she fell ill again of a severe pneumonia and she died on July 19th,1810, only 34 years old. After her death she became a symbol of all virtues that a good Prussian woman should posess. 
//////////
Some 19th. century Berlin Academy graduates:
 
* Reinhold Begas - (1831 – Berlin – 1911 Berlin) Son of painter Karl B., brother of Carl – 1843 Berlin academies under Schadow – in 1848 in the studio Rauch. 1. independent work> Hagar and Ismael <(1852). In 1855 Rome scholarship – till 1858 there in the circle Lenbach-Böcklin-Feuerbach. In 1861 with Böcklin and brook Len call in großherzogl. Art school of Weimar – in 1863 Berlin. In 1863-64 Rome 1865 Berlin – in 1869-70 and 1892 Rome. Artistic direction in the victory avenue (1895-1901 – and two Gruppenvon to him. One of the best sculptors of the 19th. Century –-, Specifically for his non modern style, not his realist impressionist outdoor or soft surface indoor impressionist work. Neo-Hellenistic Baroque / Lesser quality Impressionist Realist work / Neo Hellenistic Realism / Neo- Renaissance / Romantic Academic ; * Carl (Karlhienz ) Begas - (1845 Berlin – 1916 Köthen) Neo – Hellenistic very impressive neo Hellenistic sculpture of a Faun in the Alte Museum Berlin, Son of painter Karl B. – in the Berlin academy (1862 – 64) studies and in the studio seiners of brother Rheinhold, afterwards in the workshop of Louis Sussmann- Hellborn, him in the monuments> Frederich d. Gr. <and> Frederich Wilhelm III <({ Rathaus} city hall Berlin; town house Wroclaw (Breslau) in 1869) involved. 1. free works are Beethoven bust (1866) and charity group (1868. In 1869 and 1887 busts röm belong to Rome – during these years. Knabenund girls (bust of an Italian, in 1879, Stuttgart, Staatsgal.). Public orders in Berlin for the old (Alte) museum, the Academy of the Arts and the Zueghaus. 1890 successors to K. Hassenpflug  in the teaching post the Kasseler Academy of Arts till 1898. Employee of his brother in the Berlin national monument for emperor Wilhelm I. (1892-97, 1950 outworn) and in the (Siegesallee) victory avenue (1899).; /// * Ernst Herter -Neo – Hellenistic , Excellent work – Better than Begas for his outdoor work, particular note his “Wounded Achiles” (influenced by Cortot‘s (early 19th. Century / late 18th. Century {which is influenced by the Hellenistic sculpture – “Dying Gaul”/and obviously the articulation of the Rhodian school – Laokoon, etc…faceted geometric glyptek shape dominating the turning rythems – of simplier conclusion than more complex Greek Hellenistic}) sculpture of the “Fallen Gladiator” in the Louvre – previously placed in Versaille) at the Greek Revival estate of the wife of KaiserWilhelm II on the island of Corfu, Greece; Fritz Heinmann - Romantic Academic Realism / Neo –Hellenistic ; Heinz Hoffmeister (1851 Saarlouis – in 1894 Berlin) sculptor, Painting-around author;:Schüler from C. and R. Cauer in Kreuznach, A. Wittig in Karlsruhe and the Berlin academy. College under A. Wolff. Since 1973 in Berlin resident. Study traveling to Spain, Nord-Africa, East. Involved in the decoration of the armoury with two bronze statues: Wrangle and from Goeben in the fame hall. Numerous official orders and monuments. Hansmann-monument (1888, Aachen); Mendelssohn’s monument (1890, Dessau); figürlicher jewellery in the main entrance of the town castle in Berlin; portrait busts of the imperial family (emperor Frederich III, emperor Wilhelm II, empress Augusta Viktoria). Gravestones (statue L. Of Ravine’ on old franz. Churchyard in Berlin – not recd) One of the letzen works was the draft for a monument of the Gr. Electors in Friesack (not ausgef). Company Gladenbeck led several works of the artist in her sales catalog (Whistling faun, faun on panther, Cupid, psyche, Beethoven, resurrection). Groups: Nymph and Bacchus boy – Ganymed on the eagle of the Zeus; Busts: Closer W. Müller (Cologne, Wallraf Richartz museum) – painter P. Flickel – Herzog Ernst II v. Castle Col-Gotha; Heinrich H., Ger. sculptor, painter and author (1851-1894), pupil v. K. and R. Cauer in Kreuznach, later b. Wittig a. d. Academy. Düsseldorf., anschl. b. Wolff a. d. Academy. Berlin, active in Berlin and on Capri, lit. cf Th. B., bronze bust of a faun with kiss mouth, hairband and bird’s claw, rs. sign. “Heinz Hoffmeister” “, Gießereistempel AG before. H. Gladenbeck and son, on column from Zöblitzer Serpentin (Saxony), on the foot min best of all, H 27.5 cms. ” ; /// Theodor Erdmann Kalide - Neo- Hellenistic, – Berlin artist (1801-1863). (b Königshütte, Upper Silesia [now Chorzów, Poland], 8 Feb 1801; d Gleiwitz [now Gliwice, Poland], 23 Aug 1863). German sculptor. At the age of 15 he was apprenticed at the Königliche Eisengiesserei in Gleiwitz, where he soon began sculpting cast-iron plaques. In 1819 Johann Gottfried Schadow summoned him to Berlin, where he was instructed in chasing by Coué and worked in the Berlin Eisengiesserei. In 1821 he transferred to the studio of Christian Daniel Rauch. Following Rauch’s example and under his influence, Kalide produced such large animal sculptures as the Resting Lion and the Sleeping Lion (several casts, e.g. zinc, 1824; Berlin, Schloss Kleinglienicke). From 1826 to 1830 Kalide worked on equestrian statuettes, including those of Frederick William II (zinc), after the model by Emanuel Bardou (1744–1818), and Frederick William III (e.g. cast iron; both Berlin, Schloss Charlottenburg, Schinkel-Pav.). In 1830 he became a member of the Berlin Akademie. His most popular works included the life-size bronze group Boy with a Swan (1836), which was installed on the Pfaueninsel in Berlin as a fountain (several casts, all untraced). Kalide achieved wide recognition and aroused violent controversy with his almost life-size marble figure Bacchante on the Panther (1848; Berlin, Schinkelmus., badly damaged). This work transgressed the accepted boundaries of classical art, above all in the figure’s provocative pose, and was perceived as shocking. In its uninhibited sensuality and its blending of the human and the animal, it offended the conservative Berlin public, and consequently Kalide received few new commissions. He had no success with competition designs and became increasingly embittered. He spent his last years at Gleiwitz, where he died. After a theory in the iron foundry Gleiwitz got the well-known artist Gottfried Schadow the young Kalide into its workshop to Berlin. From there Kalide changed later into the then more popular workshop of Christian Daniel Rauch. Solved from the classically determined influence, its own artistic temper developed Schadows and Rauch more for the expression of powerful movements. Its largest artistic acknowledgment found Kalide 1836 with the well figure “The boy with swan”, which received 1851 on the Londoner world exhibition price medal and which Friedrich William IIITH for the lock park Charlottenburg acquired. (verschollen). Theodor Kalide (1801-1864) shows here a trunkene, naked woman, who räkelt herself on the back of a Panthers and gives by an adventurous setting the Raubtier from their bowl to drink. This group released a scandal after its demonstration on the citizens of Berlin academy exhibition of 1848. Kalide accused it hurts the Decorum (behaviour), by showing humans and animal on a stage. During Kiss into its Amazone still the noble fight between humans and Raubtier makes it represented here in animalisch, driveful omittingness common thing. This group of figures is natureful in their to see dionysischen beginning in greatest possible distance from the apollonischen people ideal of the classicism and can as “splendourful proclamation anti-classical Unmen” Bloch / Grzimek 1978, 137) be quite designated. After the presentation of this work Kalide kept no more orders in Berlin and had in the native Schlesien, withdraws, in order to be able to continue to work than sculptors. The Bacchantin on the Panther is received, there only as Torso in the citizens of Berlin national gallery it in to 2. World war was heavily damaged. ; Otto Lang – Romantic Academic Realism ; Michael LockNeo – Hellenistic / 19th. & early 18TH. Century Academic ; * Carl Cauer – (1828 Kreuznach – 1885 Kreuznach) Pigalle influence and Hellenistic sculpture influence ; Ludwig Brunow– (1843 Lutheran/Mecklenburg – in 1913 Berlin) rider’s monument Grand Duke Frederich Franz II (1893, Schwerin), rider’s monument emperor Wilhelm I. (1905, Erfurt) 19th. Century realism, Neo Boroque, – Frederich I., in 1883 Berlin, former. Armoury, Ruhmeshalle.this one is particularly good – it’s neo baroque; Brunnow – (1843 Lutheran/Mecklenburg – 1913 Berlin) Reiterdenkmal Großherzog Frederich Franz II. (1893, Schwerin), Reiterdenkmal Kaiser Wilhelm I. (1905, Erfurt) 19th. Century realism, Neo Boroque, – Frederich I. , 1883 Berlin, ehem. Zeughaus, Ruhmeshalle.this one is particularly good – it’s neo baroque ; Rudolf Marcuse - Neo – Hellenistic ; Julius ( Karl Adalbert) Moser - Neo – Hellenistic / Neo – Classical ; Richard Ohmann - Neo – Hellenistic / 19th. Century Realism ; Friedrich Johann Pfannschmidt - 19th.Century soft French Academy Style – but executed well ; Paul Peterich - 19th.Century Realism ; Johannes Pfuhl - Neo – Baroque – very impressive, unusual style for the 19th. century/ ; Johannes Rottger (also Düsseldorfer Akad. ) – Neo – Hellenistic / 19th. Century Academic ; Fritz (Hugo Wilhelm ) Schaper - Neo – Hellenistic / 19th. Century Academic ; Martin Schauss - Neo – Hellenistic / Soft 19th. Century French Style ; Walter Schmarje Transitional Style Period , elements of R.Begas ( his instructor ) Influence but also modern tendencies ; Moritz Schulz - Neo – Hellenistic / Neo – Classical / 19th. Century Academic ; Rudolf Schweinitz - Neo – Hellenistic / Neo – Classical ( study in Copenhagen & Italy of influence ) ; Victor Heinrich Seifert ( Vienna, Austria late 19th. 1870 – 1953 ) studied in Berlin with E. Herter, L. Manzel, & P. Breuer – Neo – Hellenistic / Late 19th. Century Academic ; Constantin Starck - ( 1866 Riga – 1939 ) 19TH. Century Academic / Hellenistic Realism; Ernst Westphahl – 19TH. Century Academic / Neo – early 18th. Century ; Carl Friedrich Wichmann ( 1775-1836 ) – Neo – Classical ; Albert Moritz Wolf - Neo – Hellenistic / 19th. Century Academic , Animals ; Martin Wolff -Neo – Hellenistic / 19th. & mid 18th. Century Academic ; Fritz Zadow – Transitional Soft late 19th. Century; August Kiss Academic 19th. Century / Neo Classical ; Hans Weddo von Glümer – (1867 Pyritz / Pommern – ?) Schüler der Kunstgewerbeschule und der Berliner Akad. – Meisterschüler von R. Begas. Debüt auf der Akad. – Ausstlg. 1890. – Nixe – Naturbursche (1892) – very nice bronze – neo Hellenistic influence – female in Grecian robe holding strands of very large and long sunflowers. – Karl Löwe Denkmal (1897, Stettin, Prueßen / Poland) , Kaiser Wilhelm Denkmal (Magdeburg) , Frederich der Große Denkmal (1906, Letschin) , Frederich der Große Denkmal (1906, Prenzlau) , Kaiser Frederich III. Denkmal (1906, Prenzlau und Magdeburg) , Ferdinand v. Schill (Stralsund) , Staatsminister Dr. v. Bötticher Berlin, Reichsamt des Innern) ; Nikolaus Geiger – (1849 Lauingen / Bayern – 1897 Berlin) Neo Hellenistic / one of the most interesting sculptors of the 19th. Century - Kaiser Barbarossa, Kaiser Wilhelm – Thuringen, Germany 1861 Steinmetzlehre in Lauingen – nebenher Gewerbeschule Augsburg – verläßt vorzeitig die Lehre – Akad. München – 1866 – 1872 Kgl. Akad. Bei Joseph Knabl und in Privatateliers tätig. 1873 Wechsel nach nach Berlin – Modelleur für Stuckornamente. 1878 -1879 Rom – 1880 Paris – 1881 Wien – 1881 – 1884 München (Malereistudium). 1893 Mitglied der Akad. Der Künste Berlin – 1896 Kgl. Professor der Berliner Akad. Verheiratet mit der Bildhauerin Henny Geiger-Spiegel. – Secessions – Kriegerdenkmal (ab 1888, Indianapolis, Indiana,U.S.A.) , Grab Amalie Hoffman, um 1889 (gest 1889 – seit 1882 Besitzer Ing. Hoffman, Berlin, Kirchhof St. Matthäus – Gemeinde) , Fries und Gruppe (1886, Berlin, Dresdner Bank) – Giebelfeld <Anbetung der Hl. drei Könige> (Vollend. 1898 von Henny Geiger-Spiegel; Berlin, St. Hedwigs – Kirche) Nikolaus Geiger – (1849 Lauingen / Bavaria – in 1897 Berlin) Neo Hellenistic / one of the most interesting sculptors of the 19th. Century – emperor Barbarossa, emperor Wilhelm– Thuringen, Germany In 1861 stonecutter apprenticeship in Lauingen – alongside vocational school Augsburg – leaves prematurely the apprenticeship – academy. Munich – In 1866 – in 1872 Kgl. Academy. With Joseph Knabl and in private studios active. 1873 changes after to Berlin – Modelleur for stucco ornaments. In 1878-1879 Rome – in 1880 Paris – in 1881 Vienna – in 1881 – in 1884 Munich (painting study). In 1893 member of the academy. Of the arts Berlin – in 1896 Kgl. Professor of the Berlin academy. Married with the sculptor Henny Geiger-Spiegel. – Secessions – war memorial (from 1888, Indianapolis, Indiana, U.S.A.), grave Amalie Hoffman, about 1889 (gest in 1889 – since 1882 owner engineer Hoffman, Berlin, churchyard Saint Mattew – municipality), frieze and group (1886, Berlin, Dresdner Bank) – tympanum <adoration of Holy three kings> (Vollend. In 1898 from Henny Geiger-Spiegel; Berlin, Saint Hedwigs – church); Georg August Gaul – (1869 Großauheim / Hanau – 1921 Berlin) Neo – Hellenistic / 19th. Century Academic – Animals,; Gustav Eberlein – (1847 Spiekerhausen – 1926 Berlin) technically very good, early work is solid neo Hellenistic / 19th. Century realism but evolved into junk of the pre modern. (* 14. July 1847 in Spiekershausen; † 5 February 1926 in Berlin) was a German sculptor, painter and a writer. It was around 1900 after Reinhold Begas that a usually busy artist of the citizens of Berlin sculptor school 19. Century. From it come among other things the Goethe monument in Rome, the Richard Wagner monument and the Lortzing monument in the citizen of Berlin zoo, the monumental work „God father haucht Adam the Odem “in Hannoversch flowing, the national monument of Argentina and further four person monuments in Buenos Aires, the kolossale „German well “in Santiago de Chile, still received rider monuments in Hamburg Altona, Geislingen and Coburg (rider monument from duke Ernst II., 1899 production) as well as person monuments in king stone, Goettingen and Dransfeld as well as sculptures in Wiesbaden (yard theatre) and Berlin (theatre of the west). The majority of its bronze monuments was melted in the Second World War, among them the emperors Wilhelm I – rider monuments in Mannheim, Elberfeld, Gera, Mönchengladbach, forest home, Neheim and Hann. Flow; the Friedrich III. – Fixed image in Elberfeld; the double monument emperor Wilhelm I. and Bismarck in Ruhr place; the Bismarck monument in Krefeld; the crucifix before the garrison church in Kiel and the Kolossalgruppen in the trade museum Stuttgart. From its two groups for the victory avenue in Berlin two marble statues and three Assistenzfiguren are received. Eberlein in the area of the haven guessing and small plastics was particularly successful. Altogether are well-known over 900 works of the sculpture, painting and Schriftstellerei. The list of works contains over 600 illustrations. Many museums in Germany and abroad possess works of Eberlein, under it the old person national gallery in Berlin (among other things thorn extractors). On art exhibitions in Berlin and Munich Eberlein with works was regularly represented. Politically Eberlein stepped out around 1900 by its commitment against the Lex Heinze and its employment for the peace between France and Prussia. Due to its critical attitude and its disapproved support to works of Augusts Rodin and Constantin Meunier were removed for 16 from 20 works from the large citizens of Berlin art exhibition 1900 „on highest instruction “. From over 300 gypsum originals became in the Städt. Museum Hann. Flow over half on the Schutthalde thrown. From a floor luggage situation of the yearly 1962 about 80 sculptures and 11 painting could be restored between 1983 and 1989. Some of it are located today in important museums (among other things German historical museum, Berlin). The grave Eberleins on the old person pc. – Matthäus Kirchhof is an honour grave of the city Berlin. The Internet sides of the Gustav Eberlein research registered association offer material, among other things an extensive bibliography, over this artist and its surrounding field. Professor Rolf Grimm has the presidency.; /// Max Klein ( Hungarian ) Excellent work Neo – Hellenistic /Romantic 19th. Century Academic ; Julius Jules Franz – (1824 Berlin – 1887 Berlin) neo Classical / neo Hellenistic / 19th. Century realism – Hirte von Einem Panther Angefallen, 1852 Shepard Attacked by a Panther, protected by his dog – 1852, bronze, – Schwerin, also Potsdam, Park Sanssouchi – 1850 – Shäfer und Hun dim Kampf mit einem Panther ; Rheinhold Boeltzig – (1863 Berlin – ?) Fruchtsammlerin, 1907 – very nice neo Hellenistic ; Konrad Kiesel (1846 Düsseldorf – 1921 Berlin) Zunächst Architektur an der Berliner Bauakad. Studiert – dann 6 Jahre Bildhauerei im Atelier von F. Schaper – wechselte spatter zur Malerei – Schüler von Fritz Paulsen in Berlin, spatter von Wilhelm Sohn in Düsseldorf. K. ließ sich 1885 in Berlin nieder – 1886 Titel <Kgl. Professor> – 1892 Ordentl. Mitglied der Berliner Akad. Der Kunste., – Hebe, den Adler tränkend, um 1870, Berlin, Privatbesitz., – bronze – female in a Grecian robe with eagle

 


-

Bertel Thorvaldsen, Danish (active Rome and Copenhagen) 1770 – 1844, Portrait Bust of the Honorable Mrs. Pellew [later Lady Pellew], Made in Rome, Italy, 1817, Marble, Height: 18 1/2 inches (47 cm) Base: 4 3/8 x 8 7/8 x 8 7/8 inches (11.1 x 22.5 x 22.5 cm), Philadelphia Museum of Art, Philadelphia, PA, U.S.A.
 
 
 
Christian Daniel Rauch Winge Victory Female Fig Potsdam

Christian Daniel Rauch Winge Victory Female Fig Potsdam

 

Christian Daniel Rauch Winge Victory Female Fig Potsdam

Christian Daniel Rauch Winge Victory Female Fig Potsdam

 

Christian Daniel Rauch Winge Victory Female Fig Potsdam

Christian Daniel Rauch Winge Victory Female Fig Potsdam

 
Christian Daniel Rauch Winge Victory Female Fig Potsdam

Christian Daniel Rauch Winge Victory Female Fig Potsdam

Christian Daniel Rauch Winge Victory Female Fig Potsdam

Christian Daniel Rauch Winge Victory Female Fig Potsdam

Christian Daniel Rauch Winge Victory Female Fig Potsdam

Christian Daniel Rauch Winge Victory Female Fig Potsdam

Christian Daniel Rauch Winge Victory Female Fig Potsdam

Christian Daniel Rauch Winge Victory Female Fig Potsdam

Christian Daniel Rauch Winge Victory Female Fig Potsdam

Christian Daniel Rauch Winge Victory Female Fig Potsdam

Christian Daniel Rauch Winge Victory Female Fig Potsdam

Christian Daniel Rauch Winge Victory Female Fig Potsdam

Christian Daniel Rauch Winge Victory Female Fig Potsdam

Christian Daniel Rauch Winge Victory Female Fig Potsdam

Christian Daniel Rauch Winge Victory Female Fig Potsdam

Christian Daniel Rauch Winge Victory Female Fig Potsdam

Christian Daniel Rauch Winge Victory Female Fig Potsdam

Christian Daniel Rauch Winge Victory Female Fig Potsdam

Christian Daniel Rauch Winge Victory Female Fig Potsdam

Christian Daniel Rauch Winge Victory Female Fig Potsdam

Rauch-Pencil-Drawing-Faith-Design

Rauch-Pencil-Drawing-Faith-Design

Rauch-Workshop-Lithograph-1856-L-Pietsch-Rauch-Home-Museum

Rauch-Workshop-Lithograph-1856-L-Pietsch-Rauch-Home-Museum

Christian-Daniel-Rauch-equestrian-statue-of-Frederick-II-of-Prussia-Berlin-Frederick-II-after-the-lost-battle-of-Kolin

Christian-Daniel-Rauch-equestrian-statue-of-Frederick-II-of-Prussia-Berlin-Frederick-II-after-the-lost-battle-of-Kolin

Rauch Goethe Plaster Rauch Home Museum

Rauch Goethe Plaster Rauch Home Museum

 

Dacian-PrisonerBoboliGarden2

Dacian-PrisonerBoboliGarden2

DaciansTarabosteslaNeapoli1

DaciansTarabosteslaNeapoli1

Dacian-PrisonerBoboliGarden

Dacian-PrisonerBoboliGarden

Demetrius-I-of-BactriaDemetriusCoin

Demetrius-I-of-BactriaDemetriusCoin

EquestrianStatueKingFrederickIIPrussiaFrederickGreatUnterLindenRauch

EquestrianStatueKingFrederickIIPrussiaFrederickGreatUnterLindenRauch

ChristianDanielRauchEquestrianFrederickIIPrussia

ChristianDanielRauchEquestrianFrederickIIPrussia

FriedrichWilhelmTheGreatElectorCharlottenburgCastleAndreasSchlüter

FriedrichWilhelmTheGreatElectorCharlottenburgCastleAndreasSchlüter

LionAnrepEstoniaChristianDanielRauch

LionAnrepEstoniaChristianDanielRauch

LionChristianDanielRauchPedimentByieckFriedhofBerrlinb

LionChristianDanielRauchPedimentByieckFriedhofBerrlinb

Neustrelitz-hirschportal

Neustrelitz-hirschportal

SchwebendeViktorienImSchwerinerSchlosses1838-40CDRauchSchwerin

SchwebendeViktorienImSchwerinerSchlosses1838-40CDRauchSchwerin

ChristianDanielRauch_byAlbertWolff

ChristianDanielRauch_byAlbertWolff

LionChristianDanielRauchPedimentByieckFriedhofBerrlina

LionChristianDanielRauchPedimentByieckFriedhofBerrlina

Neustrelitz-viktoria

Neustrelitz-viktoria

Spoorwegmonument_Nijmegen-Kleve

Spoorwegmonument_Nijmegen-Kleve

AngelRauchLuisenfriedhof-II

AngelRauchLuisenfriedhof-II

ChristianDanielRauchBertelThorvaldsen1816AlteNationalgalerieBerlin

ChristianDanielRauchBertelThorvaldsen1816AlteNationalgalerieBerlin

GerhardvonScharnhorstUnterLindenBerlinRauch

GerhardvonScharnhorstUnterLindenBerlinRauch

NuernbergDuererRauchstadtbild

NuernbergDuererRauchstadtbild

VitoryMonumentBerlinRauchMehringplatz1

VitoryMonumentBerlinRauchMehringplatz1

GerhardvonScharnhorstUnterLindenBerlinRauchFront

GerhardvonScharnhorstUnterLindenBerlinRauchFront

MonumentMieszkoIBoleslawChrobryGoldenChapelArchicathedralBasilicaPoznan

MonumentMieszkoIBoleslawChrobryGoldenChapelArchicathedralBasilicaPoznan

PrincessesLouiseOfMecklenburgStrelitzTiergartenBerlin

PrincessesLouiseOfMecklenburgStrelitzTiergartenBerlin

RauchSelfPortrait

RauchSelfPortrait

DenkmalAugustNeidhardtvonGneisenauRauchSommersdorfSachsenAnhalt

DenkmalAugustNeidhardtvonGneisenauRauchSommersdorfSachsenAnhalt

Hanau_Philippsruhe_lionRauch

Hanau_Philippsruhe_lionRauch

MunichMax-Joseph-Platz

MunichMax-Joseph-Platz

PrincessesLouiseOfMecklenburgStrelitzTiergartenBerlin2

PrincessesLouiseOfMecklenburgStrelitzTiergartenBerlin2

ChristianDanielRauchKronprinzAlexandervonRussland1829

ChristianDanielRauchKronprinzAlexandervonRussland1829

DenkmalInGoldbergLandkreisParchimMecklenburgVorpommernRauch

DenkmalInGoldbergLandkreisParchimMecklenburgVorpommernRauch

KantdenkmalRauchParadeplatzAlbertinaKönigsberg

KantdenkmalRauchParadeplatzAlbertinaKönigsberg

Neustrelitz-BluecherBustRauch

Neustrelitz-BluecherBustRauch

Frederich Wilhelm Eugen Doel – sculptor, Vielsdorf, Thuringia 1750 – Gotha, Thuringia, 1816, Germany, – Minerva handing Pegasus over to Bellerphon, Marble Reief – Gotha

3
    
 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Frederich Wilhelm Eugen Doel - sculptor, Vielsdorf, Thuringia 1750 - Gotha, Thuringia, 1816, Germany, - Minerva handing Pegasus over to Bellerphon, Marble Reief - Gotha

Frederich Wilhelm Eugen Doel - sculptor, Vielsdorf, Thuringia 1750 - Gotha, Thuringia, 1816, Germany, - Minerva handing Pegasus over to Bellerphon, Marble Reief - Gotha

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Louis Valadier, Bronze after W. Doell, Marble,of Johann Joachim Winckelmann

Louis Valadier, Bronze after W. Doell, Marble,of Johann Joachim Winckelmann

  
FOLLOWING W. Doell, Johann Joachim Winckelmann
 
 

 

 

Sculpture Works of Friedrich Wilhelm Eugen Döll 

            In Wörlitz are gardens, and buildings that are a UNESCO World Heritage-listed site. The “Dessau-Wörlitz Garden Empire,” were built in the second half of the 18th Century under the reign of Prince Leopold III. Friedrich Franz of Anhalt-Dessau (1740-1817). The park is part of the network Gartenträume Saxony-Anhalt. In the basement of the Pantheon is a cave “unterquerender” that holds a Kanope, which is a symbol of Elbflusses, reliefs of Anubis, of Osiris and the Harpokrates and a statue of Isis. They were developed by Friedrich Wilhelm Eugen Doell (1750-1816) created and belong to the earliest after ancient Egyptian art templates created in Germany.

 

Sculpture works of Eugen Doell:

Faith, Love and Hopeat the Hauptkirche in Luneburg.

22 stucco high-reliefs at the princely riding-school at Hauptreliefs in Stuck an der fürstlichen Reitbahn in Dessau

lifesize statue of Catherine II of Russia as Minerva

Catherine II, with a maiden before her offering at an altar

Winckelmann’s monument in the Rotonda in Rome

busts of Sappho and Raphael Mengs

The New Muses, Bas-relief, Gustavus Adolphus of Sweden on a horse, crowned by victories, bas-relief , Gustav Adolfs torg (Swedish for “Gustav Adolf’s Square”) is a public square in central Stockholm, Sweden named after King Gustavus Adolphus.

The square is home to the Royal Opera, the Swedish State Department, Arvfurstens palats (housing the Ministry for Foreign Affairs) and the Ministry of Defence. South of the square are the Parliament on Helgeandsholmen and the Royal Palace in Stockholm Old Town.

In the middle of the square there is a statue of Gustav II Adolf, which was erected in 1796.

lifesize figures of Minerva, a Muse and Hygieia;

grave-monument to the Gräfin von Einsiedel at Dresden and duke Karl von Meiningen;

monument to Gotthold Ephraim Lessing at the Wolfenbüttel library

Kepler’s statue at Regensburg.

  

Johann Joachim Winckelmann (1717-1768)

He was born in Stendal, the son of a poor shoemaker. He studied Greek art and literature. In Nothenitz near Dresden he was the librarian to Count Henry von Bünow, whom he collected materials for the history of the Holy Roman Empire. The familiarity of the Dresden gallery collection initiated his pursuit of his examination into art, and his association with artists, especially the artist A.F. Oeser, who later influenced Goethe. Winckelmann’s study of ancient literature carried him to Rome, where he became librarian to Cardinal Passionei in 1754, where he joined the Roman Catholic Church. Before leaving Rome he published his “Thoughts on the Imatation of Greek Works in Painting and Sculpture”. He was supported by a pension of 200 thaler in 1755, by the king of Poland, elector of Saxony, Augustus III, for his continued study in Rome. He later became a librarian in the service of the Cardinal Archinto. After the death Archintos he began in 1759 as a librarian with the cardinal Alessandro Albani, the biggest antique collector in Rome in whose services he remained up to his death. Anton Raphael Mengs was a close friend of Winckelmann who assited him with the study of Roman antiquities. Mengs also started one of the most important plaster cast collections of Greek antique sculpture in Europe in Dresden, Germany. This was integral to the initiation of the highest level of achievement in the sculpture of the Dresden, German schoolstarting at the end of the 18th. Century. This later 18th. Century Dresden, German school was born under Christian

 Daniel Rauch, and Ernst Friedrich August Rietschel, and was of great influence with the Berlin school with Johann Gottfried Schadow, as well as the architecture of Friedrich von Batzendorf : Karlsruhe plan, Germany, 1715, completed by Friedrich Weinbrenner with the Marktplaz, 1797; Friedrich Weinbrenner, (1776 Karlsruhe, – 1826 ebenda), was a German Architect, State planner, builder of Classicism, Weinbrenner-style, and teacher of the students that designed Baden Baden. Carl Gotthard Langhans, 1732, Landshut, Silesia 1808 Wroclaw (Breslau) , Lower Silesia, Architect with some of the earliest Classicism in Germany, Brandenburg Gate, Berlin, 1789-94 ; Belvedere, (Charlottenburg, Spree River, Berlin, Germany), Teahouse, and Observation Tower. Hans Christian Genelli (17631823). German architect and archaeologist, Neo-Classical, Greek Revival pioneers in Germany. German family of artists, of Danish descent. Johann Franz Joseph Genelli (1724-92) was a draughtsman and embroiderer in the service of Empress Maria-Theresa in Vienna until 1774, when he went to Prussia. Janus Genelli (1761-1813), a landscape painter, Hans Christian Genelli and Friedrich Genelli (1765-93), engraveurs, were sons of Johann Franz Joseph; (Giovanni) Bonaventura Genelli was Janus’s son. (b Berlin, 26 Sept 1798; d Weimar, 13 Nov 1868). Draughtsman and painter, nephew of Hans Christian Genelli. He was educated by his uncle, under the influence of Asmus Carstens, He also studied with the painter Friedrich Bury, in 1814-19 he attended the Berlin Kunstakademie, studying with Johann Erdmann Hummel. David Gilly (1748, Schwedt – 1808, Berlin) was a German architect and architecture-tutor in Prussia. Friedrich David Gilly (1772 Altdamm, Pomerania (Szczecin, Poland) 1800, was a German architect, the son of the architect David Gilly.  he was known as a prodigy and the teacher of the young Karl Friederich Schinkle. In 1788 he enrolled at the Akademie der Bildenden Künste in Berlin. His teachers there included Carl Gotthard Langhans, and the sculptor Johann Gottfried Schadow. Greek Revival mausoleum (180002; mostly destr. after 1942) at Dyhernfurth near Breslau (now Brzeg Dolny near Wroklaw, Poland), in the form of a prostyle Greek temple; Karl Friedrich Schinkel, (1781 Neuruppin in the Margraviate of Brandenburg 1841, Berlin) Prussian Architect and painter. Schinkel was the most prominent German architect and the best example of Neoclassicism; Leo von Klenze (Franz Karl Leopold von Klenze, 1784, – 1864, was a German Neoclassicist Architect, painter and writer. Court architect of Bavarian King Ludwig I, Leo von Klenze was one of the most prominent representatives of Greek Revival style. Von Klenze studied architecture in Berlin and Paris. Between 1808 and 1813 he was a court architect of Jérôme Bonaparte, King of Westphalia. Later he moved to Bavaria and in 1816 began to work as court architect of Ludwig I. The King’s passion for Hellenism shaped the architectural style of von Klenze. He built many neoclassical buildings in Munich, including the Ruhmeshalle and Monopteros temple. On Königsplatz he designed probably the best known modern Hellenistic architectural ensemble. Near Regensburg he built the Walhalla temple, named after Valhalla, the home of gods in Norse mythology. Russian Emperor Nicholas I commissioned von Klenze to design a building for the New Hermitage, a public museum that housed Greek, Roman, and Egyptian antiquities. Von Klenze also designed and arranged museum galleries in Munich, including the Glyptothek and Alte Pinakothek. Von Klenze was not only an architect, but also an accomplished painter and draughtsman. In many of his paintings ancient buildings were depicted. Those served as models for his own architectural projects. Klenze studied ancient architecture during his travels to Italy and Greece. He also participated in excavations of ancient buildings in Athens and submitted projects for the restoration of the Acropolis. Louise Seidler produced a drawing of the friezes of Leo von Klenze’s Apollotempel at the Nymphenburg Palace for Goethe; etc… In April, In spring, 1768 Winckelmann began a long planned trip to Germany, however, when he was in Regensburg, he returned through Vienna to Italy. In Trieste he fell victim to a murder with robbery. Today Winckelmann is designated as the father of Classical archeology. The Roman collections and also the discoveries in Pompeii and Herculaneum offered him a fullness of material which he described, sorted and created an artistic specification for catagorizing type. In 1762 Winckelmann published his “Observations on the Architecture of the Ancients”, including an account of the temples at Paestum, and his writings on Herculaneum, and Pompeii in 1762, as well as his History of the art of Antiquity in 1764. On this occasion, for the first time he developed a sequence of style epochs of the Greek and Roman art.

 - 

 Leopold Doel, sculptor, Gotha,Thuringia, Germany

 

Leopold Doel, sculptor, Gotha,Thuringia, Germany

Leopold Doel, sculptor, Gotha,Thuringia, Germany

Wörlitz park Pantheon

Wörlitz park Pantheon

 

 

Frederich Wilhelm Eugen Doel - sculptor, Vielsdorf, Thuringia 1750 - Gotha, Thuringia, 1816, Germany, - Minerva handing Pegasus over to Bellerphon, Marble Reief - Gotha

Frederich Wilhelm Eugen Doel - sculptor, Vielsdorf, Thuringia 1750 - Gotha, Thuringia, 1816, Germany, - Minerva handing Pegasus over to Bellerphon, Marble Reief - Gotha

 Friedrich Wilhelm Eugen Döll, (1750, Veilsdorf  bei Hildurghausen – 1816, Gotha) was a German sculptor. In the sphere of Eugen Doel was Louise Seidler born on 15 May 1786 was the daughter of an academic in the university in Jena. She spent her youth with her grandmother (under whom she learned music and drawing) then on her grandmother’s death was adopted by the wife of a doctor Stieler at Gotha. Her love of art was developed under the sculptor Friedrich Wilhelm Eugen Döll, who had returned to Gotha after an eleven year stay in Rome. Back in Jena she lived in her father’s house, next door to Goethe’s home in Jena’s Schloss, getting to know him in her childhood. In Jena she also became friends with Silvie von Ziegesar and Pauline Gotter, later wife of the Jena professor Friedrich Wilhelm Schelling. Louise Seidler gained full admission to intellectual circles in the city, which then included Friedrich Schiller, Johann Gottlieb Fichte, Friedrich Wilhelm Schelling , Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, the brothers Alexander and Wilhelm von Humboldt, the brothers Friedrich and August Wilhelm Schlegel, Friedrich Tieck, Clemens Brentano, Voß, Paulus, Friedrich Immanuel Niethammer, Zacharias Werner and others. Goethe met her in the house of the publisher Carl Friedrich Ernst Frommann, and had a lifelong close friendship. The Gothaer Hofbildhauer Eugen Friedrich Wilhelm Doell (1771 – 1816) founded 1786 at the palace Friedenstein of Ernst II, in Gotha, Thuringen, Germany an Academy of Fine Art, and an Abgusssammlung, (plaster cast collection of primarily antique Greek Hellenistic sculpture). Doell created the marble bust of Johan Joachim Winckelmann in Rome in 1779-1780. After he studied in Paris with Houdon in Paris, Doell was paid a stipend by the King Ernst II of Saxony – Gotha, and Altenburg, Thuringen to make copies of Greek sculpture in Italy for eleven years. This was to achieve a level of sculpture greater than the Germanic school was able to offer at the time. The program was no doubt influenced by Houdon. The largest collection of Houdon’s sculpture was in Gotha, Germany, collected by Ernst II of Saxony – Gotha, and Altenburg. The collection in Gotha rivals the collection in the Louvre. Houdon’s work collected, and commissioned in his life time is in Gotha, Berlin, Weimar, Eisenach, Altenburg, Rudolstadt, and Schwerin, Germany.  

/////////////////

{ Various sculptors in the centuries after the Mannerist / High Renaissance, and the Baroque of Italy. The text included mostly from related web sources on the sculptors. }

-

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Guillaume I COUSTOU – Lyon, 1677 – Paris, 1746
Cheval retenu par un palefrenier dit Cheval de Marly
1739 – 1745


 

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Guillaume I COUSTOU – Lyon, 1677 – Paris, 1746, Cheval retenu par un palefrenier dit Cheval de Marly 1739 – 1745

 

 

 

 

 

 

- Guillaume I COUSTOU - Lyon, 1677 – Paris, 1746
Cheval retenu par un palefrenier dit Cheval de Marly
1739 – 1745, Musée du Louvre

-

- Guillaume I COUSTOU - Lyon, 1677 – Paris, 1746
Cheval retenu par un palefrenier dit Cheval de Marly
1739 – 1745, Musée du Louvre

-

- Guillaume I COUSTOU – Lyon, 1677 – Paris, 1746, Cheval retenu par un palefrenier dit Cheval de Marly 1739 – 1745

-

Guillaume I COUSTOU - Lyon, 1677 – Paris, 1746
Cheval retenu par un palefrenier dit Cheval de Marly
1739 – 1745, Musée du Louvre, Paris, France,
Horses restrained by grooms, known as The Marly Horses 1745
The sculptures were installed at the Château de Marly in 1745. They were moved to Paris in 1794 on the initiative of the painter David, and placed on high pedestals at the bottom of the Champs-Elysées.
Carrara marble
MR 1802: H. 3.40 m; W. 2.84 m; D. 1.27 m
MR 1803: H. 3.40 m; W. 2.84 m; D. 1.27 m
Entered the Louvre on 6 and 13 November 1984.,

{ Horses restrained by grooms, known as The Marly Horses

These two large marble sculptures representing horses restrained by grooms were commissioned in 1739 for the horse pond in the gardens of the Château de Marly. In 1743, the king chose the models exhibited in the Louvre courtyard; the marble sculptures were installed at Marly in 1745. In 1749, they were moved to Paris on the initiative of the painter David, and placed on high pedestals at the bottom of the Champs-Elysées.

Description

A work of diverse inspiration, commissioned to replace another

The statues of Fame and Mercury, commissioned by Louis XIV from Antoine Coysevox for the horse pond at Marly, were taken to the Tuileries in 1719. Louis XV discovered the Château de Marly in 1739 and, to fill the gap left by the removal of the sculptures, commissioned two groups from Guillaume I Coustou (Coysevox’s nephew). Coustou’s achievement rivaled that of his deceased uncle with its technical prowess: two colossal works, sculpted from a monolithic block of Carrara marble in the record time of two years (1743-45). Many details, such as the bridle (now broken), the tousled mane, the light and floating tail, and the bearskin on the horse’s back, required delicate carving.
The artist was probably inspired by the antique statues of the Dioscuri with their rearing horses in front of the Quirinal Palace in Rome, and prestigious examples of such horses from French sculpture of the 18th century, such as the Horses of the Sun by the Marsy brothers (a model of which is in the Louvre). He was no doubt sensitive to the recent masterpiece by Robert Le Lorrain (c. 1737), a high-relief for the stable at the Hôtel de Rohan. Above all, he drew his inspiration from nature, studying the movements of men and horses from live models.

Emulation and innovation

The novelty of this work lies in the absence of any mythological or allegorical reference. It represents primitive nature, a struggle between two wild forces: an untamed horse and a naked man, athletic muscles straining. Coysevox’s military trophies have been replaced here by reeds and rocks on an uneven ground. The powerful, thick-necked horse shows every sign of panic and anger: rearing up, tossing its head and whinnying, with dilated eyes and nostrils, and a tousled mane. The almost invincible force of nature seems about to break free again. Wherever the spectator stands, the impression of movement, strength, and violent struggle is perceptible. A moment in time has been captured, heralding something of the Romantic works of Géricault. Indeed, Victor Hugo admired “those neighing marbles [...] prancing in a cloud of gold“. Coustou claimed to have sculpted (American) Indian slaves, which explains the quiver and feathered headdress that have fallen to the ground in the struggle. The reference is approximate (one groom appears to be from the West, the other African), but the sculpture prefigures Rousseau’s idea of the “noble savage” – an idea already propagated by the accounts of travelers and missionaries.

Protective transfers

From the outset, Coustou’s horses were considered to be masterpieces of French sculpture and were spared the fate of the Château de Marly (destroyed during the Revolution). In 1795, on the orders of the painter David, they were taken to the Place de la Révolution (now the Place de la Concorde) at the bottom of the Champs-Elysées, to join the sculptures of Coysevox. The Marly Horses were moved to the Louvre in 1984 to be conserved, and were replaced by copies on the Place de la Concorde and at Marly } Text from the Louvre

 

-

-

Pierre PUGET, Milo of Crotona, Produced from 1671-82
Musée du Louvre

-

-

Pierre PUGET - Marseille, 1620 – Marseille, 1694
Milon de Crotone
Musée du Louvre,

Milo of Crotona
Produced from 1671-82
Set in the grounds of Versailles in 1683
Carrara marble
H. 2.7 m; W. 1.4 m; D. 0.8 m

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

{ A meditation on the human condition

Colbert having granted Pierre Puget the right to carve three blocks of Carrara marble that had been left unused in the port of Toulon, the sculptor – born in Marseilles and trained in baroque Italy – began his Milo of Crotona in 1671, completing it only in 1682.
The theme, foreign to sculpture until then, is not only a meditation on the victory of time over strength, but also on man’s pride. Milo is vanquished above all by his vanity and his denial of the weakness attendant to his age. His pain is as much moral as physical. Human glory is ephemeral, as signified by the symbol of the cup won at the Games and now lying on the ground, a worthless object.
It is rather puzzling that Puget selected such a subject for a work destined to the king. He was to manifest the same audacity again with his bas-relief of Alexander and Diogenes, also in the Louvre.

A fascinating composition

Although each side of the sculpture was treated with equal virtuosity, Puget did nevertheless favor the frontal angle. The work is meant to be seen either facing the spectator or in a three-quarter view. Milo’s writhing, aching body is an immense zigzag: a succession of three diagonals decreasing in size, culminating with his head thrown back in a cry of agony.
The body is arched against the tree trunk that forms the axis around which the composition pivots. In the center, two large openings were cut into the marble in order to detach the athlete’s silhouette from the background. This hollowing-out of the base is a rare occurrence in sculpture and represents a technical feat.

Puget and Antiquity

Puget certainly had in mind the Hellenistic group of Laokoon, a sculpture in the pope’s collections, which to the artists of the time epitomized the image of heroic pain. In this piece, the Great Priest of Troy, a very old man, dies a stoic death, strangled by the snake sent by the gods. Puget, however, decided to create a modern piece. He did not idealize the representation of the hero and substituted the violent expression of suffering for the serenity of the Ancients. The body here is arched with pain and the face reduced to a grimace, while the tensed toes seem to claw the ground. When the sculpture was unveiled at Versailles in 1683, Queen Maria Theresa is said to have exclaimed: “Poor man! ” The beautiful cuts of Puget’s chisel make us forget that we are looking at marble. The lion’s claws appear to plunge into real flesh. The muscles seem to stretch and the veins to bulge under our eyes. The modulations of the surface render the impression of shuddering flesh.
The sculptor opposed the extremely smooth finish of the body and the rougher aspect of the other elements. The lion’s fur is carved with a burin; the trunk and ground are streaked with a point. Puget thus distinguished the story’s three actors – man, beast, and nature – through variations in the treatment of the surface. } from the Louvre text

 

 

 

 

 

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Étienne-Maurice FALCONET (1716-1791)
Milo of Croton
1754

 

 

 

 

 

 

-

Étienne-Maurice FALCONETParis, 1716 – Paris, 1791 Milon de Crotone
Musée du Louvre
, M.R. 1847
Sculptures

-

Étienne-Maurice FALCONET – Paris, 1716 – Paris, 1791
Louvre Museum, Paris, France, (1716-1791) Milo of Croton, 1754, Reception piece for the Academy, 1754, Marble, H. 66.8 cm; W. 64.9 cm; D. 51.2 cm,

Milo of Croton

When the Greek athlete Milo grew old, he decided to test his legendary strength by trying to split open a cleft tree trunk; his hand remained trapped in the trunk, and he was devoured by wild animals. In this sculpture, he screams his helplessness, his eyes fixed on the lion, his muscles taut with strain. Falconet chose to treat this subject in order to pit himself against the sculptor Pierre Puget, an inescapable reference.

Description

Ten years between the plaster model and the marble sculpture

The Royal Academy of Painting and Sculpture approved Falconet’s plaster model on 29 August 1744, while reproaching him for the work’s resemblance to that of Pierre Puget (in the Louvre). He was asked to create a different work for his reception piece: a Genius of Sculpture, the model for which was approved in 1745. However, the Academy then decided otherwise, instructing Falconet to make the marble of Milo. After a ten-year wait, Falconet was accepted into the Academy on 31 August 1754.

Falconet and Puget: two versions of Milo

Falconet’s choice and energetic treatment of his subject obviously stemmed from a desire to pit himself against his distinguished elder, for whom he had always professed great admiration. The Academy’s suspicion of plagiary was clearly unjust, however. Puget’s Milo is standing, pushing away the head of the lion that is biting him; if his other hand were not trapped, he would surely triumph. In Falconet’s version, Milo is defeated, knocked to the ground, his right leg flailing in the air, his left straining in vain. The cleft in the tree is essential to Puget’s composition, but secondary here. Puget concentrated on the suffering man, relegating the lion to the background; Falconet focused on the confrontation between man and wild animal, positioning their heads at almost the same level, setting savagery against pain. The lion’s anatomy and expression are rendered with naturalistic vigor, whereas Puget’s lion is almost heraldic.

Baroque naturalism

The theatricality and virtuosity of this work are of baroque inspiration: the sweeping diagonals, the twisting of the bodies, the lifelike flesh, the opposition of light and shade, the paroxysmal expression (Milo’s face was inspired by Bernini’s Damned Soul, in Santa Maria di Monserrato, Rome). Falconet demonstrated his technical and compositional skill, his anatomical knowledge, and his mastery of foreshortening (with the figure of the lion). However, when he presented his marble sculpture at the Salon of 1755, its style clashed with the contemporary taste for antiquity: despite its generally favorable reception, it was soon criticized for lack of nobility. The naturalism of the sculpture offended: Falconet had idealized neither the body (he portrayed the folds of the abdomen and the hairs on the chest) nor the face (a self-portrait with snub nose). His vigorous portrayal of Milo also clashed with the classical ideal that required a dying hero to express stoic restraint. } Text from the Louvre

-

-

Johann Nepomuk Schaller, ( 1777 Wein – 1842 Wein ) 

-

-

InvNr.:2558

-

Johann Nepomuk Schaller (* 30. März 1777 in Wien; † 16. Februar 1842 in Wien) war ein österreichischer Bildhauer, (was an Austrian sculptor)

. – Bellerophon im Kampf mit der Chimeira ( 1821 ), Genre: Mythologische Darstellung, Standbild
Typ: Skulptur
Technik: Marmor
Signatur: r.(Sockel): I. SCHALLER VIENENSIS. FECIT ROMA 1821
Maße: H: 210 cm; inkl. Sockel: 270 cm
 
 
 
 

 

-

InvNr.:6558

-

Johann Nepomuk SCHALLER
1777 Wien – 1842 Wien

Venus nach dem Bade ( 1816 )

Genre: Mythologische Darstellung, Statuette
Typ: Skulptur , Technik: Carraramarmor
Signatur: in der Kanne: JS, Maße: H: 53 cm Rahmenmaße: 51 x x cm

-

InvNr.:2287

-

Johann Nepomuk Schaller, ( 1777 Wein – 1842 Wein ) 

Philoktet (Verwundeter Krieger) ( 1808 – 1809 )
Genre: Mythologische Darstellung, Typ: Skulptur, Technik: Blei
Signatur: unbezeichnet , Maße: H: 62 cm; inkl. Sockel: 67 cm
 
 
 
 

 

-

InvNr.:4202

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Johann Nepomuk Schaller, ( 1777 Wein – 1842 Wein ) 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Der jugendliche Amor ( 1815 – 1816 ) , Genre: Mythologische Darstellung, Statuette, Typ: Skulptur,
Technik: Carraramarmor , Signatur: unbezeichnet, Maße: H: 130 cm
 
 
 
 
 

 

-

InvNr.:2557

-

Johann Nepomuk Schaller, ( 1777 Wein – 1842 Wein ) 

Venus zeigt Mars ihre von Diomedes verwundete Hand ( 1810 ) , Genre: Mythologische Darstellung, Typ: Relief, Technik: Tiroler Marmor Signatur: unbezeichnet , Maße: 72 x 105 cm –

Johann Nepomuk Schaller was the younger brother of the painter Anton Ferdinand Schaller. From In 1789 if he visited them Academy of the pedagogic arts Vienna, where Hubert Maurer his teacher was. From 1789 to visited he first the academy of the arts and learned the elementary figure drawing with professor Huber. Before it began – as it was intended by its parents – training as Uhrmacher; its teacher Hagenauer discovered however the special talent for ornament sculptures. In the year 1791 it became Bossierlehrling k.k. Porzellanmanufaktur, where already its father worked, and visited in the subsequent year instruction of Antonio Grassi and Franz Anton of Zauner, which prepared him for its future career/development as sculptors.
From In 1792 if he changed in the sculptor’s class to Antonio Grassi and Franz Anton von Zauner. Already In 1791 if it became, in addition, Bossierlehrling in the porcelain manufacture. In 1801 if he brought it to the model master and In 1811 to the Obermodelleur. The love to Porcelain if Schaller his whole other life was preserved, so that he was an artistic adviser of the porcelain manufacture up to his death.
 
 
 
 

 

In 1812-In 1823 if Schaller stayed as a scholarship holder in Rome. There he had contact with him Nazarenern and to the significant sculptors Antonio Canova and Bertel Thorvaldsen. King Ludwig I. if Schaller wanted to appeal to Munich what kicked this, however. However, nevertheless, he made busts for that Valhalla in.

In 1823

if he returned to Vienna and became a professor for sculpture in the academy. He had with it for the following artist’s generation strong influence. Counted to his pupils Josef Gasser. His studio was in the little early landlord’s house in today’s Technikerstrasse No. 9. Schaller lived at first in the lane Joanelli 2 and 8, and then in the lane Wickenburg 8. He died in the suburb Laimgrube in the today’s Dürer’s lane 1. Later he received a grave on him Viennese central cemetery. To his early works after the return belonged a further kolossale Büste of the count Friedrich von Trautmannsdorff, who was likewise for the Walhalla of the Bavarian king intended. Further partially kolossale Büsten of the emperor followed as well as for the Bavarian Walhalla in Regensburg for verschiednen client.
 
 
 
 
 

 

In 1907 Schallergasse was named in Wien-Meidling according to the sculptor.

-

 

-

-

In the memorial Walhalla in Donaustauf (Upper Palatinate) if become since 1842 signifying ones German as well as with the history Of Germany and of her To Germanic people linked personalities by marble büsten and commemorative tables honored.

The architect Leo von Klenze built the construction thought as a “fame stamp” from 1830 to 1842 by order King Ludwigs I. of Bavaria high over the Danube with Regensburg. The Walhalla originated in the classicistic style and received the figure of a marmornen Greek temple according to the model Parthenon in Athens. It is named after Whale sound, the Wohnstatt of the liked warriors in that Germanic mythology.

By the opening 160 persons were honored with 96 busts and in the cases of missing authentic pictures with 64 commemorative tables. Today it is reminded with 127 busts and 65 commemorative tables of 192 persons and groups. Only eleven of the honored are women, although these were expressly included by Ludwig I.: „ No state not, also the female gender not, is excluded. Equality exists in the Valhalla; if the death lifts, nevertheless, every earthly difference. “ As the bust last for the time being became in 22nd February In 2003 from Sophie Scholl taken up in the Walhalla, on behalf for the members of the opposition in the third empire for which an additional commemorative table was appropriated.

The Walhalla is a property Free state Bavaria. Every German and every German interest group can suggest a honorary personality from the Germanic family of languages at the earliest 20 years after their death and then carries if necessary the costs for the manufacture and installation of the bust. On the new admissions decides to her Bavarian council of ministers

 

-

 

-

 

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Johann Nepomuk Schaller, – König

 Ludwig I. in der Walhalla

 

 

 

 

 

 

The establishment of the Walhalla is to be seen before the background of the German political situation of the 19-th century. Under the impression of the defeats against the French and the political disunity of Germany one began increasingly to search the national identity in the Germanic past. The establishment of national monuments, as for example Hermannsdenkmals im Teutoburger Wald , Of Hermann’s monument in Teutoburger wood, the indeed mostly classicistic style were, however, Germanic subjects took up, is a result of this identity search.

Already when crown prince came Ludwig I. In 1807 on the idea, for all big Germans („ to establish an honorary temple of teutscher tongue ”), and the first busts already became during the years In 1807 to In 1812 provides. With his government beginning In 1825 if 60 busts were already completed. From the works contract up to completion of the Valhalla there passed 26 years. The laying of the foundation stone for the fame stamp occurred on the 18th October, 1830.

In 18th October In 1842, to the 29-th anniversary of her Völkerschlacht bei Leipzig, open Ludwig I. the construction with the following words:

„ If Walhalla might f seyn of the Erstarkung and the increase of teutschen sense! If liked to feel all Teutschen which of trunk they also have seyen, always, that they common native country. And everybody contributes, so much he is capable, to glorification!

 

-

-

Jacques Prou (Paris, 1655-1706)
Amphitrite
Executed 1705-6
Installed in the park of the Château de Marly, initially in the middle of the Bassin des Carpes, then in the Fontaine d’Amphitrite, which was modified several times.
Marble
H. 0.97 m; W. 1.73 m; D. 0.65 m

-

-

-

Jacques Prou (Paris, 1655-1706)
Amphitrite,
Executed 1705-6, Musée du Louvre

Amphitrite was the wife of the Greek god of the sea, Poseidon (the Roman Neptune). She is portrayed as a Nereid, a sea-nymph, as in classical representations of marine triumphs such as Raphael’s Triumph of Galatea (Galleria Farnese, Rome). Semi-reclined on drapery, she is leaning against a dolphin that she is restraining with a cord. Prou gave her a generous, supple, curvaceous body. The drapery accompanies her curves, emphasizing the small of the back, climbs delicately over her shoulder to accentuate her breasts, and wraps itself around her left leg. Long strands of hair have come loose from her coiffure, one descending her right shoulder to her breast, another wedding the curve of the left shoulder. Her left foot is resting on an aquatic plant. The extreme delicacy of the highly idealized facial features, apparently a characteristic of the artist’s work, can also be seen in his admission piece for the Académie, Sculpture Presenting the King’s Medallion to the King (1662, Musée du Louvre). There is a slight smile on her impishly graceful face. The sculpture’s elegance owes much to the care the artist lavished on its details: the nymph’s laurel-crowned hair, the braid border of the drapery, the plaiting of the dolphin’s cord, and the aquatic vegetation

-

Peterskirche - Außenansicht - Relief

-

 

Weyr Rudolf Ritter von (Tankred),

 

 

Peterskirche, Outside view, relief, The tallness shows ” emperor Karl the relief of Rudolf Weyr from the year 1906 the Peter’s church ” founds., Außenansicht, Relief

Das Relief von Rudolf Weyr aus dem Jahr 1906 zeigt “Kaiser Karl der Große gründet die Peterskirche”.

Weyr, Rudolf, * 22.3.1847 Vienna, † 30.10.1914 ibid., sculptor; uncle of Siegfried Weyr. Studied in the Viennese academy, was active in the studio of sculptor J. Cesar and cooperated in the skulpturalen arrangement of the art-historical and the physical-historical museum as well as the Hermes’s villa in Vienna; among the rest, created monuments for H. Canon (1905) and J. Brahms (1908) in Vienna. Beside V. Tilgner one of the most significant Austrian representatives of the new baroque in the sculpture. 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

 

-

 

Einer der beiden Löwen neben dem von Otto Wagner errichteten Schleusenbau in Nussdorf

 

-

 

The pillars form at the same time monument base for the bronze lions of Rudolf Weyr.
The election slogan emperor Franz Joseph ” with combined forces ” (Viribus unitis) stands in golden letter on one of the pillars. His fixing certifies to the Nußdorfer weir and so many other Viennese buildings that they were established in the reign emperor Franz Joseph I., in 1848 – in 1916.

 
 
 
 
 
 

 

-

-

-

Rudolf Weyr, - Wien, Hofburg “Macht zur See”,

was made in 1895 by Rudolf von Weyr (1847-1914). Also this figure adorns one of the rudolfinischen house crown felt crown.

 

-

-

-

Ressel Park (4th district of Vienna) is close to St.Charles’ and the Technical University, both in the vicinity of the Musikverein.

Somewhat hidden in the bushes, near the entrance to the Historical Museum of Vienna, stands the monument of Johannes Brahms, designed by Rudolf Weyr and unveiled on May 7th, 1908. The City of Vienna paid for the project, thus honouring the great composer with this marble monument. It shows Brahms seated, at his feet a female figure with a lyre.

 

-

Vienna, Volksgarten

-

You can see here the Volksgarten, on this public park you can find the monument of Franz Grillparzer (a poet), the sculpture was done by Rudolph Weyr, Karl Kundmann and Karl Hasenauer in 1889. In this park there’s also The Temple of Theseus an imitation of the Theseion temple in Athens, built between 1820 and 1823 by Peter Nobile. Inside the temple there used to be the “Group of Theseus” by Antonio Canova (now in the Museum of Fine Arts).

http://www.virtourist.com/europe/vienna/18.htm

-

Grillparzer, Volksgarten. Foto: Tjaky

Grillparzer. Foto: Tjaky

 Franz Grillparzer (1/15/1791 – 1/21/1872), with assistance from – Rudolf Weyr – releif sculpture for this monument.
An architectural Niesche, from Karl Hasenauer is sketched, the seated figure of the poet envelops. For the wings Rudolf Weyr Reliefs has created. In the choice of the motives one notices that the court has promoted the monument: (v. li. n. re.) ” the ancestress “, ” the dream a life “, ” king of Otto’s cirque luck and end “, “Sappho”, “Medea” and ” of the sea and the dear waves ” – scenes from grill par cerium dramas.
No protracted quarrel around the location or shortage of money hindered the work – nevertheless, it lasted 12 years, until it was ready. Already four years after the death of the poet the work of the private Denkmalkomitées was almost concluded. There was only no useful draft. Two competitions brought no result.

The support of the imperial house to Lebezeiten would have used grill par cerium more. His wish to become a manager of the university library never went to fulfilment. He remained as a manager in the court chamber archive. There Joseph Schreyvogel encouraged him, castle theater script editor, stage plays to write. Grill par cerium pieces did him one of the biggest poets of his time, however, the difficulties with the censorship as well as the failure of his comedy ” woe he lies ” did in a bitter person who withdrew more and more.

The monument was revealed on the 23rd May, 1889. 8,000 guilders were left in the Denkmalkassa. One handed over them to the castle head team who undertaken to arise for the preservation of the monument.

 -

-

Das Ban Jelačić Denkmal in Zagreb

Anton Dominik Ritter von Fernkorn – (* 17. März 1813 in Erfurt; † 16. November 1878 in Wien)

 (* 17. March 1813 in Erfurt; † 16 November 1878 in Vienna) was a German sculptor and picture caster. It is considered as one of the most important masters of early historicism.

After he learned partial auto+didactical training in Munich with Ludwig Schwanthaler. Starting from approximately 1850 it was in Vienna, where it an old cannon foundry (today electrotechnical institute building DO Viennain since 1873 in such a way designated casting house road) as working place (bildgiesserei) used.

Its most well-known works are patriotic fixed images in Austria, above all the rider statues of ore duke Karl (1853-1859) and prince Eugen (1860-1865) at the hero place. From it also the lion of Aspern is, a lying lion as monument to the victory over Napoleon in the battle with Aspern. This sculpture is likewise at the hero place – however on that in Aspern (today some of vienna Danube city).

The monument of ore duke Karl, after a painting of Johann Peter Krafft, is in as much a technical wonderwork as the horse stands only on the hind legs. This feat could not be repeated with the prince Eugen any longer: here the tail of the horse affects the base.

After several impact accumulations of Fernkorn prince Eugen was finished by his pupils. After the legend remote grain illness came along that it could not repeat the technical achievement of the ore duke Karl monument. Its pupil Franz Pönninger continued the picture foundry workshop.

In Zagreb the famous rider monument stands to honours of the Croatian Ban Josip Jelačić, which was likewise created by remote grain. It was finished 1864 and inaugurated on 17 December 1866 Weblinks [Bearbeiten]

    Von „http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anton_Dominik_Fernkorn

    -
    -

    The “Saviour of the Occident”, who played an important part in the wars against the Turks, was the first to receive a memorial in the area of the Hofburg, without being part of the House of Habsburg. Horse and rider were concluded in 1865 by Anton Dominik Fernkorn, when the artist’s mind already was affected by sickness.

     

     

    -

    Ariadne mit dem Panther

    -

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Johann Heinrich Dannecker (1758 – 1841)
    »Ariadne auf dem Panther«

    1803, Gebrannter Ton

    Das Tonmodell ist die erste Studie zur lebensgroßen, 1814 vollendeten Fassung in Marmor. Sie war für den Frankfurter Bankier Simon Moritz von Bethmann bestimmt, der dafür ein eigenes Gebäude errichtete.

    Ariadne, von Theseus verlassen, wird von Bacchus auf der Insel Naxos getröstet und ihm, mit Weinlaub bekränzt, auf einem Panther entgegengetragen. Der sensationelle Erfolg von Danneckers Skulptur beruhte auf der Verbindung von erotischer Freizügigkeit und monumentaler Form. Das restaurierte Original ist heute im Liebieg-Haus in Frankfurt zu sehen, ein moderner Abguss steht in der Rotunde der Neuen Staatsgalerie.

    -

    Attributed To Johan Heinrich von Dannecker, ARIANE ASSISE SUR UNE LIONNE

    -

    Johan Heinrich von Dannecker

     

    Attributed To Johan Heinrich von Dannecker
    Title   ARIANE ASSISE SUR UNE LIONNE  
    Medium   Marble marbre de carrare et povonazetta
    Size   57.1 x 45.7 in. / 145 x 116 cm.
    Sale Of Ariadne (ărēăd’nē) [key], in Greek mythology, Cretan princess, daughter of Minos and Pasiphaë. She loved Theseus, and gave him the skein of thread that enabled him to make his way out of the labyrinth after killing the Minotaur. When Theseus left Crete, Ariadne went with him, but before they reached Greece, he abandoned her at Naxos. There the god Dionysus consoled and later married her. She bore him several children, including Oenopion, whom Dionysus first taught the art of winemaking. It was said that Zeus granted Ariadne immortality and that Dionysus set her bridal crown, the Corona Borealis, among the stars. Subsequent treatments include nearly 50 operas by Monteverdi, Handel, Massenet, Richard Strauss, Milhaud, Martinu, and others. Picard Scp.: Sunday, September 19, 1993
    [Lot 251]
    MAISON DE LA CHIMIE
     

    -

    Johann Heinrich von Dannecker

    Dannecker – Ariadne – 1889 drawing

    (born October 15, 1758 in Waldenbuch near Stuttgart; died December 8, 1841 in Stuttgart) was a German sculptor.

     

    He was the third of five children of Georg Dannecker (1718-1786), a coachman of Karl Eugen. In 1764, the family moved to Ludwigsburg. From 1772 to 1780, he was educated as a sculptor, together with Philipp Jacob Scheffauer (1756-1808). Initially, he studied under Adam Bauer, and, starting in 1775, at the military academy at Stuttgart. After finishing the academy in 1780, he traveled to Paris, Rome, Bologna and Mantua, and returned to Stuttgart in 1790, where he worked as a professor at the Hohe Karlsschule until 1794. In 1804, he did the initial draft of “Ariadne on the Panther“, which he finished from 1810 to 1824, generally regarded as his masterpiece and one of the most important sculptures of the 19th century.
    After the death of his schooltime friend Friedrich Schiller, Dannecker created a bust of him. In 1823 and 1824, he created a bust of John the Baptist.
    -
    Johan Heinrich von Dannecker, Minerva als Hermenbüste
    -

    Johan Heinrich von Dannecker

     

    Johan Heinrich von Dannecker
    Title   Minerva als Hermenbüste
    Year   1785 – 1786
    Medium   Marble
    Size   11.8 x 0 in. / 30 x 0 cm.

    -

    JOHANN HEINRICH VON DANNECKER (1758-1841), German sculptor, was born at Stuttgart, where his father was employed in the stables of the duke of Wurttemberg, on the 15th of October 1758. The boy was entered in the military school at the age of thirteen, but after two years he was allowed to take his own taste for art. We find him at once associating with the young sculptors Scheffauer and Le Jeune, the painters Guibal and Harper, and also with Schiller, and the musician Zumsteeg. His busts of some of these are good; that of Schiller is well known. In his eighteenth year he carried off the prize at the Concours with his model of Milo of Crotona. On this the duke made him sculptor to the palace (1780), and for some time he was employed on child-angels and caryatides for the decoration of the reception rooms. In 1783 he left for Paris with Scheffauer, and placed himself under Pajou. His Mars, a sitting figure sent home to Stuttgart, marks this period; and we next find him, still travelling with his friend, at Rome in 1785, where he settled down to work hard for five years. Goethe and Herder were then in Rome and became his friends, as well as Canova, who was the hero of the day, and who had undoubtedly a great authoritative influence on his style. His marble statues of Ceres and Bacchus were done at this time. These are now in the Residenz-schloss, at Stuttgart. On his return to Stuttgart, which he never afterwards quitted except for short trips to Paris, Vienna and Zurich, the double influence of his admiration for Canova and his study of the antique is apparent in his works. The first was a girl lamenting her dead bird, which pretty light motive was much admired. Afterwards, Sappho, in marble for the Lustschloss, and two offering-bearers for the Jagdschloss; Hector, now in the museum, not in marble; the complaint of Ceres, from Schiller’s poem; a statue of Christ, worthy of mention for its nobility, which has been skilfully engraved by Amsler; Psyche; kneeling water-nymph; Love, a favourite he had to repeat. These stock subjects with sculptors had freshness of treatment; and the Ariadne, done a little later, especially had a charm of novelty which has made it a European favourite in a reduced size. It was repeated for the banker Von Bethmann in Frankfort, and it now appears the ornament of the Bethmann Museum. Many of the illustrious men of the time were modelled by him. The original marble of Schiller is now at Weimar; after the poet’s death it was again modelled in colossal size. Lavater, Metternich, Countess Stephanie of Baden, General Benkendorf and others are much prized. Dannecker was director of the Gallery of Stuttgart, and received many academic and other distinctions. His death in 1841 was preceded by a period of mental failure.
     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    << William T. Dannat -

    -

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Sappho Statue

    Johann Heinrich von Dannecker (1758-1841), about 1800

    -

    Dannecker Delphin mit dem Leichnam eines jungen Mannes, 1809

    -

    1809 schuf Dannecker Keramikarbeiten, u.a. die herrliche Terracotta
    “Delphin mit dem Leichnam eines jungen Mannes”
    (siehe Abbildung unten).

    -