Johann Heinrich von Dannecker, (born October 15, 1758 in Waldenbuch near Stuttgart; died December 8, 1841 in Stuttgart), NIKE “VITTORIA ALATA”, Original / Copy: Greco-Roman copy Date: 30 BC – 14 AD of a Hellenistic Greek statue,

Johann Heinrich von Dannecker, (born October 15, 1758 in Waldenbuch near Stuttgart; died December 8, 1841 in Stuttgart)

-

Johann Heinrich Dannecker (1758 - 1841) »Ariadne auf dem Panther«

-

Ariadne mit dem Panther

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Johann Heinrich Dannecker (1758 – 1841)
»Ariadne auf dem Panther«

1803, Gebrannter Ton

Das Tonmodell ist die erste Studie zur lebensgroßen, 1814 vollendeten Fassung in Marmor. Sie war für den Frankfurter Bankier Simon Moritz von Bethmann bestimmt, der dafür ein eigenes Gebäude errichtete.

Ariadne, von Theseus verlassen, wird von Bacchus auf der Insel Naxos getröstet und ihm, mit Weinlaub bekränzt, auf einem Panther entgegengetragen. Der sensationelle Erfolg von Danneckers Skulptur beruhte auf der Verbindung von erotischer Freizügigkeit und monumentaler Form. Das restaurierte Original ist heute im Liebieg-Haus in Frankfurt zu sehen, ein moderner Abguss steht in der Rotunde der Neuen Staatsgalerie.

 

 

 

 

-

Attributed To Johan Heinrich von Dannecker, ARIANE ASSISE SUR UNE LIONNE

-

Johan Heinrich von Dannecker

Attributed To Johan Heinrich von Dannecker
Title   ARIANE ASSISE SUR UNE LIONNE  
Medium   Marble marbre de carrare et povonazetta
Size   57.1 x 45.7 in. / 145 x 116 cm.
Sale Of Ariadne (ărēăd’nē) [key], in Greek mythology, Cretan princess, daughter of Minos and Pasiphaë. She loved Theseus, and gave him the skein of thread that enabled him to make his way out of the labyrinth after killing the Minotaur. When Theseus left Crete, Ariadne went with him, but before they reached Greece, he abandoned her at Naxos. There the god Dionysus consoled and later married her. She bore him several children, including Oenopion, whom Dionysus first taught the art of winemaking. It was said that Zeus granted Ariadne immortality and that Dionysus set her bridal crown, the Corona Borealis, among the stars. Subsequent treatments include nearly 50 operas by Monteverdi, Handel, Massenet, Richard Strauss, Milhaud, Martinu, and others. Picard Scp.: Sunday, September 19, 1993
[Lot 251]
MAISON DE LA CHIMIE
 

-

Johann Heinrich von Dannecker

Dannecker – Ariadne – 1889 drawing

(born October 15, 1758 in Waldenbuch near Stuttgart; died December 8, 1841 in Stuttgart) was a German sculptor.

 

He was the third of five children of Georg Dannecker (1718-1786), a coachman of Karl Eugen. In 1764, the family moved to Ludwigsburg. From 1772 to 1780, he was educated as a sculptor, together with Philipp Jacob Scheffauer (1756-1808). Initially, he studied under Adam Bauer, and, starting in 1775, at the military academy at Stuttgart. After finishing the academy in 1780, he traveled to Paris, Rome, Bologna and Mantua, and returned to Stuttgart in 1790, where he worked as a professor at the Hohe Karlsschule until 1794. In 1804, he did the initial draft of “Ariadne on the Panther“, which he finished from 1810 to 1824, generally regarded as his masterpiece and one of the most important sculptures of the 19th century.
After the death of his schooltime friend Friedrich Schiller, Dannecker created a bust of him. In 1823 and 1824, he created a bust of John the Baptist.
 
 

 

 

-

Johan Heinrich von Dannecker, Minerva als Hermenbüste

-

Johan Heinrich von Dannecker

Johan Heinrich von Dannecker
Title   Minerva als Hermenbüste
Year   1785 – 1786
Medium   Marble
Size   11.8 x 0 in. / 30 x 0 cm.

-

JOHANN HEINRICH VON DANNECKER (1758-1841), German sculptor, was born at Stuttgart, where his father was employed in the stables of the duke of Wurttemberg, on the 15th of October 1758. The boy was entered in the military school at the age of thirteen, but after two years he was allowed to take his own taste for art. We find him at once associating with the young sculptors Scheffauer and Le Jeune, the painters Guibal and Harper, and also with Schiller, and the musician Zumsteeg. His busts of some of these are good; that of Schiller is well known. In his eighteenth year he carried off the prize at the Concours with his model of Milo of Crotona. On this the duke made him sculptor to the palace (1780), and for some time he was employed on child-angels and caryatides for the decoration of the reception rooms. In 1783 he left for Paris with Scheffauer, and placed himself under Pajou. His Mars, a sitting figure sent home to Stuttgart, marks this period; and we next find him, still travelling with his friend, at Rome in 1785, where he settled down to work hard for five years. Goethe and Herder were then in Rome and became his friends, as well as Canova, who was the hero of the day, and who had undoubtedly a great authoritative influence on his style. His marble statues of Ceres and Bacchus were done at this time. These are now in the Residenz-schloss, at Stuttgart. On his return to Stuttgart, which he never afterwards quitted except for short trips to Paris, Vienna and Zurich, the double influence of his admiration for Canova and his study of the antique is apparent in his works. The first was a girl lamenting her dead bird, which pretty light motive was much admired. Afterwards, Sappho, in marble for the Lustschloss, and two offering-bearers for the Jagdschloss; Hector, now in the museum, not in marble; the complaint of Ceres, from Schiller’s poem; a statue of Christ, worthy of mention for its nobility, which has been skilfully engraved by Amsler; Psyche; kneeling water-nymph; Love, a favourite he had to repeat. These stock subjects with sculptors had freshness of treatment; and the Ariadne, done a little later, especially had a charm of novelty which has made it a European favourite in a reduced size. It was repeated for the banker Von Bethmann in Frankfort, and it now appears the ornament of the Bethmann Museum. Many of the illustrious men of the time were modelled by him. The original marble of Schiller is now at Weimar; after the poet’s death it was again modelled in colossal size. Lavater, Metternich, Countess Stephanie of Baden, General Benkendorf and others are much prized. Dannecker was director of the Gallery of Stuttgart, and received many academic and other distinctions. His death in 1841 was preceded by a period of mental failure.
 
 
 

 

<< William T. Dannat -

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Sappho Statue

Johann Heinrich von Dannecker (1758-1841), about 1800

 

 

 

 

-

Dannecker Delphin mit dem Leichnam eines jungen Mannes, 1809

-

1809 schuf Dannecker Keramikarbeiten, u.a. die herrliche Terracotta
“Delphin mit dem Leichnam eines jungen Mannes”
(siehe Abbildung unten).

-

-

Denkmal mit Skulptur des Armor

Standort: Schlosspark, Berlin-Charlottenburg, Berlin, Deutschland – 1873 –

Bildhauer: Sculptor: H. Hopfgarten (oder Bildgießer?),

Representation: Armor, Remark: Armor, an approx. 12-year-old boy, stretches a curve. His quiver he has hung about denAststumpf of a wooden trunk behind his left leg. The Stirnharre are bound to a braid, so that the hair do not interfere with the curve span (and shooting)., Material: Bronze

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Denkmal mit Skulptur des Armor, Standort: Schlosspark, Berlin-Charlottenburg, Berlin, Deutschland, Objekttyp: Denkmal, Skulptur, Genre: Bildhauerei, Zeit: 1873
Bildhauer:Sculptor:  H. Hopfgarten (oder Bildgießer?), Representation: Armor 
Remark: Armor, an approx. 12-year-old boy, stretches a curve. His quiver he has hung about denAststumpf of a wooden trunk behind his left leg. The Stirnharre are bound to a braid, so that the hair do not interfere with the curve span (and shooting). 

Material: Bronze,

 

-

 

 

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Denkmal mit Skulptur des Armor, Standort: Schlosspark, Berlin-Charlottenburg, Berlin, Deutschland, Objekttyp: Denkmal, Skulptur, Genre: Bildhauerei, Zeit: 1873
Bildhauer:Sculptor:  H. Hopfgarten (oder Bildgießer?), Representation: Armor 
Remark: Armor, an approx. 12-year-old boy, stretches a curve. His quiver he has hung about denAststumpf of a wooden trunk behind his left leg. The Stirnharre are bound to a braid, so that the hair do not interfere with the curve span (and shooting). 

Material: Bronze, Bildträger: Fotografie, Format: digital, Foto: Andres Imhof, Zeit: ??.??.2006, ?? Uhr, Haben Sie zusätzliche Informationen, möchten Sie Inhalte korrigieren oder mir ein Feedback geben? Ich freue mich über Ihre Nachricht. Unterstützen Sie das Projekt “Kulturdatenbank”. Weitere Informationen finden Sie hier.

 

 

 

-

-

Skulptur: Herkules kämpft mit dem Nemeischen Löwen, – Sculptor: Max Klein
Standort: Fahrbeckstraße, Ecke Arnimallee, auf dem Gelände des Museums, Berlin-Dahlem, Berlin, Deutschland, Objekttyp: Skulptur, Genre: Bildhauerei, Zeit: 1879, Stil: -
Bildhauer: Sculptor: Max Klein, Bildgießer: Hermann Gladenbeck und Söhne

Weitere Werke: Neptunbrunnen in Berlin-Mitte, Viktoria der Siegessäule auf der Straße des 17. Juni in Berlin, Denkmal Freiherr vom Stein in Berlin-Kreuzberg., Bemerkung: -

Material: Bronze, Darstellung: Herkules, Löwe

 

 

 

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Skulptur: Herkules kämpft mit dem Nemeischen Löwen – Sculptor: Max Klein
Standort: Fahrbeckstraße, Ecke Arnimallee, auf dem Gelände des Museums, Berlin-Dahlem, Berlin, Deutschland, Objekttyp: Skulptur, Genre: Bildhauerei, Zeit: 1879, Stil: -
Bildhauer: Sculptor: Max Klein, Bildgießer: Hermann Gladenbeck und Söhne

Weitere Werke: Neptunbrunnen in Berlin-Mitte, Viktoria der Siegessäule auf der Straße des 17. Juni in Berlin, Denkmal Freiherr vom Stein in Berlin-Kreuzberg., Bemerkung: -

Material: Bronze, Darstellung: Herkules, Löwe

 

 

 

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Skulptur: Herkules kämpft mit dem Nemeischen Löwen – Sculptor: Max Klein
Standort: Fahrbeckstraße, Ecke Arnimallee, auf dem Gelände des Museums, Berlin-Dahlem, Berlin, Deutschland, Objekttyp: Skulptur, Genre: Bildhauerei, Zeit: 1879, Stil: -
Bildhauer: Sculptor: Max Klein, Bildgießer: Hermann Gladenbeck und Söhne

Weitere Werke: Neptunbrunnen in Berlin-Mitte, Viktoria der Siegessäule auf der Straße des 17. Juni in Berlin, Denkmal Freiherr vom Stein in Berlin-Kreuzberg., Bemerkung: -

Material: Bronze, Darstellung: Herkules, Löwe, Bildträger: Fotografie, Format: digital, Foto: Andres Imhof, Zeit: 15.01.2007, 12:14 – 12:23 Uhr, Haben Sie zusätzliche Informationen, möchten Sie Inhalte korrigieren oder mir ein Feedback geben? Ich freue mich über Ihre Nachricht. Unterstützen Sie das Projekt “Kulturdatenbank”. Weitere Informationen finden Sie hier.

 

 

 

 

 

-

-

Muschelminna Brunnen, Standort: Postplatz, Görlitz, Sachsen, Deutschland,
Objekttyp: Brunnen, Genre: Architektur, Skulptur, Zeit: 1887, Stil: Neorenaissance, Architekt: R. Toberentz, Weitere Werke:Bemerkung: Nach der Wende wurde der Brunnen nach Vorlage alter Fotos wieder rekonstruiert, – Material: Carara-Marmor, Bronze, Remark: After the turn the well was reconstructed after presentation of old photos again, 
 

 

 

-

Muschelminna auf dem Postplatz von Detlef Menzel

-

1879 Breslauer sculptor Robert Toberentz, (1849.12.04 in Berlin, gest.-1895.07.31 in Rostock) Breslau, Silesia ( Wroclaw, Poland ) Berlin 4. 12. 1849 – 31. 7. 1895 Rostock. Study at the citizens of Berlin academy, thereafter two years in the studio of Johannes Schilling in Dresden and 1872-75 in Rome. Return to Berlin. 1879-85 directors/conductors of the master studio for sculpture at the Schlesi Provinzialmuseum Breslau. 1891 return to Berlin. 1895 professor titles. Married with the Rodinschülerin Catherine Toberentz.
which planned the completion of the well in six years.

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Durchblick2 von Andreas Pe

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Muschelminna Brunnen, Standort: Postplatz, Görlitz, Sachsen, Deutschland,
Objekttyp: Brunnen, Genre: Architektur, Skulptur, Zeit: 1887, Stil: Neorenaissance, Architekt: R. Toberentz, Weitere Werke:Bemerkung: Nach der Wende wurde der Brunnen nach Vorlage alter Fotos wieder rekonstruiert, – Material: Carara-Marmor, Bronze, Remark: After the turn the well was reconstructed after presentation of old photos again, Bildträger: Fotografie, Format: digital, Foto: Andres Imhof, Zeit: 19.08.2006, 16.01 – 16.11 Uhr, Haben Sie zusätzliche Informationen, möchten Sie Inhalte korrigieren oder mir ein Feedback geben? Ich freue mich über Ihre Nachricht. Unterstützen Sie das Projekt “Kulturdatenbank”. Weitere Informationen finden Sie hier.
 

 

 

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Charles-François Leboeuf (Nanteuil)

Eurydicé piquée par un serpent, Plaster, - Louvre Museum, Paris, France

 -

-

Eurydicé

-

-

Eurydicé

-

-

Charles-François Leboeuf (Nanteuil)

Eurydicé piquée par un serpent

Bourse-Opéra-Grands Boulevards
Galerie Colbert

-

 

Louvre Museum, Paris, Frankreich


Charles-François Lebœuf, aka Nanteuil (French, 1792-–1865)

Sterbende Eurydike. Marmor, Rom 1822, Ausstellung im Salon 1824.

Dimensionen H. 1.46 m (4 ft. 9 ¼ in.), B. 53 cm (20 ¾ in.), D. 90 cm (35 ¼ in.)

Credit line Purchase by Charles X of France, 1825

Accession number CC 7

Department of Sculptures, Richelieu, lower ground floor, Cour Puget

Photo/Quelle Jastrow (2006)

 

 

-

-

-

-

-

S29.1 NIKE “VITTORIA ALATA”

Museum Collection: Brescia Musei , Brescia, Italy
Archive Number:
Title: “Vittoria Alata” or “Nike of Brescia”
Class: Free-standing statue
Material: Bronze with traces of gilding
Height: 1.10 metres
Context: Found in Temple of Vespasian, Brescia
Original / Copy: Roman original derived from Greek statue style C4th BC
Style: Early Imperial
Date: C1st BC
Period: Imperial Roman

SUMMARY

Nike, the goddess of victory, winged with arms outstretched. Originally a statue of Aphrodite (type Capua), a pair of wings were added to make her a Nike when she was given by Rome to the town of Brixia.

-

 

-

Nike of Brescia

Museum Collection: Brescia Musei , Brescia, Italy
Bronze, H 1.10 m

:D scoved in the Temple of Vespasian, Brescia

Greek copy during Roman Rule (1st c. BC) of a Greek original 4th c. BC

(Aphrodite/Venus holding a mirror? transformed into a Nike)

 

 

-

-

S29.2 NIKE “VICTORY OF SAMOTHRACE”

Museum Collection: Musée du Louvre, Paris, France
Archive Number: Louvre Ma 2369
Title: “Nike of Samothrace”
Class: Free-standing statue
Material: Marble
Height: 2.73 metres (colossus)
Context: Discovered in Samothrace, Greece
Original / Copy: Greek original by sculptor of Rhodes derived from C4th BC type
Style: Hellenistic
Date: 220 – 190 BC
Period: Hellenistic

SUMMARY

Nike, the winged goddess of victory striding forward.

-

-

S31.2 EROS

Museum Collection: State Hermitage Museum, St Petersburg, Russia
Catalogue Number: TBA
Title: “Eros Drawing His Bow”
Class: Free-standing statue
Material: Marble
Height: 0.62 metres
Context: From Rome
Original / Copy: Roman copy of Greek statue
Style:
Date: 30 BC – 14 AD
Period: Imperial Roman

SUMMARY

The winged godling Eros (Love personified) strings his bow.

-

-

S31.6 EROS

Museum Collection: Museo Pio-Clementino, Musei Vaticani, Vatican City
Catalogue Number: TBA
Title: “Eros of Tespia “
Class: Free-standing statue
Material: Marble
Height:
Context: Found in Rome
Original / Copy: Roman copy of Greek bronze statue by Lysippus ca 338 – 335 BC
Style: Classical
Date: C2nd AD
Period: Imperial Roman

SUMMARY

The winged godling Eros (Love personified) draws his bow (missing).

-

-

S31.1 EROS

Museum Collection: Museo Capitolino, Rome, Italy
Catalogue Number: Rome MC0410
Title: “Eros Stringing his Bow”
Class: Free-standing statue
Material: Marble
Height: 1.23 metres
Context:
Original / Copy: Roman copy of Greek statue by Lysippos C4th BC
Style: Hellenistic
Date:
Period: Imperial Roman

SUMMARY

The winged godling Eros (Love personified) strings his bow.

-

-

S31.3 EROS

Museum Collection: British Museum, London, UK
Catalogue Number: TBA
Title: “Eros Stringing his Bow “
Class: Free-standing statue
Material: Marble
Height:
Context:
Original / Copy: Roman copy of Greek statue
Style:
Date:
Period: Imperial Roman

SUMMARY

The winged godling Eros (Love personified) strings his bow.

-

 

-

Ganymeades & The Eagle, State Hermatage Museum, St. Petersburg, Russia, Late Hellenistic / (Greco Roman) copy of a Hellenistic Greek bronze. Ganymeades holding a staff and resting an arm on the eagle of Zeus.

-

-

S28.1 SELENE

Museum Collection: Museo Pio-Clementino, Musei Vaticani, Vatican City
Catalogue Number:
Title:
Class: Free-standing statue
Material: Marble
Height:
Context:
Original / Copy:
Style:
Date:
Period: Imperial Roman

SUMMARY

The moon goddess Selene with raised cloak, lunar-crescent, and torch.

-

 

Greek Hellenistic, & Greco Roman Aphrodite sculpture.

1
  
Kallipygos Aphrodite, Kallipygos is Greek for with a beautiful rump Greco-Roman marble copy after a Greek Hellenistic bronze, Naples National Archaeology Museum

Kallipygos Aphrodite, Kallipygos is Greek for with a beautiful rump Greco-Roman marble copy after a Greek Hellenistic bronze, Naples National Archaeology Museum

Kallipygos Aphrodite, Kallipygos is Greek for with a beautiful rump Greco-Roman marble copy after a Greek Hellenistic bronze, Naples National Archaeology Museum

Kallipygos Aphrodite, Kallipygos is Greek for with a beautiful rump Greco-Roman marble copy after a Greek Hellenistic bronze, Naples National Archaeology Museum

Kallipygos Aphrodite, Kallipygos is Greek for with a beautiful rump Greco-Roman marble copy after a Greek Hellenistic bronze, Naples National Archaeology Museum

Kallipygos Aphrodite, Kallipygos is Greek for with a beautiful rump Greco-Roman marble copy after a Greek Hellenistic bronze, Naples National Archaeology Museum

Kallipygos Aphrodite, Kallipygos is Greek for with a beautiful rump Greco-Roman marble copy after a Greek Hellenistic bronze, Naples National Archaeology Museum

Kallipygos Aphrodite, Kallipygos is Greek for with a beautiful rump Greco-Roman marble copy after a Greek Hellenistic bronze, Naples National Archaeology Museum

Kallipygos Aphrodite, Kallipygos is Greek for with a beautiful rump Greco-Roman marble copy after a Greek Hellenistic bronze, Naples National Archaeology Museum

Kallipygos Aphrodite, Kallipygos is Greek for with a beautiful rump Greco-Roman marble copy after a Greek Hellenistic bronze, Naples National Archaeology Museum

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kallipygos Aphrodite, Kallipygos is Greek for with a beautiful rump Greco-Roman marble copy after a Greek Hellenistic bronze, Naples National Archaeology Museum

Kallipygos Aphrodite, Kallipygos is Greek for with a beautiful rump Greco-Roman marble copy after a Greek Hellenistic bronze, Naples National Archaeology MuseumKallipygos Aphrodite, Kallipygos is Greek for with a beautiful rump Greco-Roman marble copy after a Greek Hellenistic bronze, Naples National Archaeology MuseumKallipygos Aphrodite, Kallipygos is Greek for with a beautiful rump Greco-Roman marble copy after a Greek Hellenistic bronze, Naples National Archaeology Museum

Aphrodite, FriederichswerderscheKirch, Schinkel Museum designed by Karl Frederich Schinkel - architect 1822 - 1823
Aphrodite, FriederichswerderscheKirch, Schinkel Museum designed by Karl Frederich Schinkel – architect 1822 – 1823
Aphrodite, FriederichswerderscheKirch, Schinkel Museum designed by Karl Frederich Schinkel - architect 1822 - 1823

Aphrodite, FriederichswerderscheKirch, Schinkel Museum designed by Karl Frederich Schinkel - architect 1822 - 1823

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aphrodite, FriederichswerderscheKirch, Schinkel Museum designed by Karl Frederich Schinkel - architect 1822 - 1823

Aphrodite, FriederichswerderscheKirch, Schinkel Museum designed by Karl Frederich Schinkel - architect 1822 - 1823

Aphrodite, FriederichswerderscheKirch, Schinkel Museum designed by Karl Frederich Schinkel – architect 1822 – 1823

 

{This sculpture is influenced by the Venus Callypige, Napoli, Hellenistic sculpture pictured below. The German sculpture of Aphrodite is not as sophisticated in form-content, or as gracefull as the Greek Venus Callypige sculpture.}, bloger, PBP

The National Archaelogical Museum of Naples can be considered one of the most important cultural centres in the world in terms of the quantity and quality of Greek and Roman relics it contains. The museum building was constructed in 1585, on the hill of Santa Teresa, then a solitary spot but now surrounded by the chaotic traffic of the city centre. The building was originally a Cavalry Barracks, built by order of Don Pedro Giron, Duke of Ossuna, viceroy of Naples; was later used as a University, and was finally turned into a museum under Charles of Bourbon.
The National Library was also situated here for a long period, up until 1922 when it was transferred to the Royal Palace. The initial nucleus of the museum was established by Charles of Bourbon to display the Farnese collection which he inherited from his mother. However, the subsequent enlargement of the immense artistic patrimony, determined by the addition of remains found in the archaeological excavations at Pompeii, Herculaneum and Stabia, led to the search for new premises, a
nd

Afrodite

-

the transfer to the present building. It is practically impossible to mention every one of the enormous number of relics and works on display here, which makes the National Archaeological Museum of Naples one of the most authoritative and prestigious collections in the world; we will instead limit ourselves to some of the most important artistic works.
It should also be remembered that a change in exhibiting criteria has led, in the last few years, to a new arrangement of the areas open to the public.
Most notable among the various exhibits and rooms are the Farnese Hercules, from the Roman Baths of Caracalla; the Farnese Cup a splendid example of cameo, once a part of the Medici collections; the Halls of Villa Papyri, where numerous sculptural exhibits are displayed, brought here from the excavations at the Herculaneum villa; the Halls of the Temple of Isis, containing frescoes and other material from Pompeii, once kept in the museum’s store-rooms; the Doryphorus, an admirable copy from the original by Polyclitus, from Pompeii; the relief showing the myth of Orpheus and Eurydice; the “Tirannicides”, Aristogeiton and Harmodius, the magnificent Roman copy of a Greek original of the 5th century BC; the Venus Callypige, from an Hellenistic original; the Farnese Bull, also from Capua; the small bronze of the Dancing Faun; the mosaic showing the Battle of Issus. Completing the vast array of exhibits are paintings from Pompeii, Herculaneum and Stabia, sculptures, small bronzes, and a collection of vases. Among the latter, note the vases originating form Etruria, Attica, Lucania, Apulia and Campania. Among the exhibits linked to Etruscan culture, the Small Bronze of a Donor (5th-4th centuries BC) is of considerable importance; it was found in the Commune of Capoliveri (Island of Elba) at the end of the 16th century.

-

-

Aphrodite Kallipygos, National Museum Neapel

Der Name soll folgendem Vorfall seine Entstehung verdanken. Zwei sizilische Mädchen stritten sich, welche von ihnen am Hinterteil schöner sei. Ein Jüngling, zum Schiedsrichter aufgefordert, entschied für die ältere und vermählte sich mit ihr, sein Bruder mit der andern. Beide Mädchen, nun reich geworden, errichteten darauf der Aphrodite in Syrakus einen Tempel mit ihrem Bild in oben bezeichneter Stellung. Eine berühmte Statue dieser Art, wenn die Darstellung nicht etwa ein Hetärenmotiv ist, steht im Nationalmuseum zu Neapel.

-

-

Venus Callypige, Napoli, Hellenistic Greek sculpture during Roman occupation period, marble, after Hellenistic Greek bronze sculpture

-

-

-

Aphrodite von Kyrene

-

-

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aphrodite von Kyrene

Venere Anadyomene, trovata a Cirene, From Kyrene, marble statue, standing, female, in the nude., As a prop garment about dolphin with fish.
“Anadyomene”., Museo Nazionale delle Therme , Rome, Italy

 

-

-

 

 

 

 

 

Aphrodite von Syrakus

-

-

Aphrodite von Syrakus

-

-

Aphrodite von Syrakus,Syracuse, archaeological museum
Marble statue, standing, female, garment before the unterbody.
As a prop dolphin
“Anadyomene”

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Torse féminin du type de “l’Aphrodite de Cnide”
Oeuvre d’époque romaine impériale (IIe siècle après J-C ?)
N° usuel Ma 2184
Greek, Etruscan, and Roman Antiquities

 

-

Torse féminin du type de “l’Aphrodite de Cnide”
Oeuvre d’époque romaine impériale (IIe siècle après J-C ?), Louvre Museum, Paris, France

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

Aphrodite
Late 2nd century BC
N° d’entrée LL 299 (n° usuel Ma 399)

-

Aphrodite
Late 2nd century BC. Louvre, Paris, France

-

-

Aphrodite, Date : near Ist century B.C., Musée archéologique d’Istanbul, Sculpture of Magnesia…

-

-

Statue of a woman from the sanctuary of Artemis Polo, IInd century B.C., Musée archéologique d’Istanbul, Hellenistic and Hellenistic.influential in Roman sculpture
Musée Archéologique, Area related : Limenas (Grèce)

-

-

“Venere di Cirene.”

-

-

-

-

“Venere di Cirene.”

The 2nd century statue of the goddess Venus was found in 1913 by Italian troops near the ruins of the Greek and Roman settlement of Cyrene, on the Libyan coast, the Culture Ministry said Tuesday. It is now housed in Rome’s National Roman Museum. Italy will return to Libya the ancient Roman statue taken from the former North African colony – a move Rome hopes will help its own campaign to retrieve allegedly looted antiquities from museums worldwide. The statue of Venus was brought to Italy after it was found in 1913 by Italian troops near the ruins of the Greek and Roman settlement of Cyrene, on the Libyan coast, the Culture Ministry said Tuesday. A date for the 2nd-century statue’s return has yet to be set, ministry officials said. The statue is now housed in Rome’s National Roma

-

Crouching Venus

-

The Crouching Venus  
Many different, and slightly varying, versions of a Crouching Venus, all thought to be copies of a Greek statue made in the third century BC, were discovered from the 16th century onwards. The version owned by the Medici, and displayed in the room at the Uffizi known as the Tribuna, became the most celebrated; reproduced here is a version in the Vatican Museum in Rome. At one period the statue was thought to represent Venus just after her birth from a seashell, but it has also been described as the bathing or washing Venus.-

 

-

-

Venus de Medici, after Greek Hellenistic, Hellenistic Greek copy during Roman occupation of Greek bronze, Ufizzi, Florence, Italy

-

-

Venus de Medici, Ufizzi, Florence, Italy

-

-

Venus de Medici, Ufizzi, Florence, Italy

-

-

Venus de Medici, after Greek Hellenistic, Hellenistic Greek copy during Roman occupation of Greek bronze, Ufizzi, Florence, Italy

-

-

Aphrodite von Sinuessa

-

-

Aphrodite von Sinuessa

-

-

Aphrodite von Sinuessa

-

-

Aphrodite von Sinuessa,Marble statue, standing, female, garment before the unterbody., Museo Nazionale, Rome, Italy

-

-

Crouching Venus, Rom, Thermenmuseum (Terme, Museum)
Aus der Villa Hadriana, Tivoli.

-

-

APHRODITE “CROUCHING APHRODITE”, Musée du Louvre, Paris, France, “Aphrodite accroupie”, Material: Marble, Height: 0.71 metres, Copy by Greek sculptors of an earlier Greek statue C3rd BC, during Roman Imperial period, Style: Hellenistic, Aphrodite crouching, bathing herself with upraised arm.

 

-

-

-

-

Crouching Aphrodite. Marble, Greek sculptors hired during the Imperial Era after a Hellenistic type: the goddess is raising her left hand towards her neck whereas the protype used to cross her arms on her breast., H. 71 cm, Collections of Louis XIV of France; seized during the French Revolution (27 ¾ in.), Department of Greek, Etruscan and Roman Antiquities, Sully, ground floor, room 17, Louvre Museum, Paris France

-

 

-

-

Crouching Aphrodite. Marble, Greek sculptors hired during the Roman period to copy a sculpture of the 2nd century CE after a Hellenistic original of the 3rd century BC, loosely derived from the Cnidian Aphrodite by Praxiteles., H. 71 cm (27 ¾ in.), Department of Greek, Etruscan and Roman Antiquities, Sully, ground floor, room 17, Louvre Museum, Paris, France

-

-

Venus de Vienne

-

-

Venus de Vienne

-

-

Venus de Vienne, Crouching Venus, Louvre, Museum, Paris, France

-

-

Crouching Aphrodite. Marble, Roman copy of the 1st-2nd century CE after a Hellenistic original of the 3rd century BC, loosely derived from the Cnidian Aphrodite by Praxiteles. From Sainte-Colombe, Isère, France., H. 96 cm (37 ¾ in.), Gerantet Collection; purchase, 1878, Department of Greek, Etruscan and Roman Antiquities, Sully, ground floor, room 17, Louvre Museum, Paris, France

-

-

Crouching Aphrodite. Marble, Roman copy of the 1st-2nd century CE after a Hellenistic original of the 3rd century BC, loosely derived from the Cnidian Aphrodite by Praxiteles. From Tyre, Lebanon., H. 74 cm (29 in.), Purchase, 1887, Department of Greek, Etruscan and Roman Antiquities, Sully, ground floor, room 17, Louvre Museum, Paris, France

-

-

Crouching Aphrodite, Naples Natinal Archaeology Museum, Naples, Italy

-

-

APHRODITE “CROUCHING APHRODITE”, Museum Collection: British Museum, London, UK (on loan from Queen Elizabeth II), Catalogue Number: London GR 1963.10-29.1, Title: “Aphrodite accroupie”, Material: Marble, Height: 1.12 metres, Copy: Roman copy of Greek statue after Doedalsas of Bithynia ca 250 BC, Style: Hellenistic, Date: C2nd AD
Period: Imperial Roman,
Aphrodite crouching at her bath, covering her nakedness with enclosing arms.

-

-

So-called “Lely’s Venus”: Aphrodite surprised as she bathes. Marble, Roman copy from the 2nd century BC after an Hellenistic original., H. 1.12 m (3 ft. 8 in.), Former collection of Sir Peter Lely; lent by H.M. Queen Elizabeth II, Main floor, room 23, Greek & Rome, British Museum, London, United Kingdom

-

-

APHRODITE & EROS, Museum Collection: Museo Nazionale Archeologico di Napoli, Naples, Italy, Material: Marble, Copy by Greek sculptors hired during the Roman Imperial period to copy, or make a varient of a Greek statue after Doedalsas of Bithynia ca 250 BC
Style: Hellenistic, Period: Imperial Roman,
Aphrodite crouching with a winged Eros (Love) at her side
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 

-

-

Crouching Aphrodite, Ufizzi Museum, Florence, Italy

-

-

APHRODITE “CALLIPYGIAN VENUS “, Museum Collection: Museo Nazionale Archeologico di Napoli, Naples, Italy, Title: “Callipygian Venus”, Material: Marble, Copy by Greek sculptors during the Roman Imperial period hired to copy, or make a varient of a Greek statue ca 225 BC, Style: Hellenistic, Period: Imperial Roman, Aphrodite Kallipygos (of the beautiful buttock) lifting her robe and gazing down at her buttocks.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

-

-

APHRODITE “APHRODITE OF RHODES”, Museum Collection: Archaeological Museum of Rhodes, Rhodes, Greece
Title: “Aphrodite of Rhodes”, Material: Marble, Copy made by Greek scculptors hired during the Roman Imperial period – Remodelling of the Aphrodite Doidalsos type C3rd BC , Style: Hellenistic, Date: C1st AD
Period: Imperial Roman, Aphrodite crouching with her hair raised in her hands.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

-

-

APHRODITE & EROS, Museum Collection: State Hermitage Museum, St Petersburg, Russia, Title: “Aphrodite accroupie & Eros “
Material: Marble, Height: 0.89 metres, Copy by Greek sculptors hired during Roman Imperial period to copy a Greek statue after Doedalsas of Bithynia ca 250 BC, Style: Hellenistic, Date: C2nd AD, Period: Imperial Roman, Aphrodite crouching at the bath wth her winged son Eros (Love).
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

-

-

APHRODITE “VENUS DE CAPUA “, Museum Collection: Museo Archeologico Nazionale di Napoli, Naples, Italy
Title: “Venus de Capua”, Material: Marble, Height: 2.04 metres
Context: Found at Capua, Copy by Greek sculptors during the Roman Imperial period hired to copy a Greek statue C4th BC, Style: Early Hellenistic, Period: Imperial Roman, Aphrodite partially disrobed, her arms raised to hold a polished shield in which to gaze at her reflection (missing).
 -
 
 
 
 

Franz Alexander Friedrich Wilhelm Wolff (* 6. April 1814 in Fehrbellin; † 30. Mai 1887 in Berlin) -Bacchantin mit dem freilich hundezahmen Panther, 1869, FriederichswerderscheKirch, Schinkel Museum

Franz Alexander Friedrich Wilhelm Wolff (* 6. April 1814 in Fehrbellin; † 30. Mai 1887 in Berlin) -Bacchantin mit dem freilich hundezahmen Panther, 1869, FriederichswerderscheKirch, Schinkel Museum

 
 
 -

 

Franz Alexander Friedrich Wilhelm Wolff (* 6. April 1814 in Fehrbellin; † 30. Mai 1887 in Berlin) -Bacchantin mit dem freilich hundezahmen Panther, 1869, FriederichswerderscheKirch, Schinkel Museum designed by Karl Frederich Schinkel – architect 1822 – 1823, Berlin, Germany

{This is an example of the sculpture enclosed within a geometric shape (an alignment within and through a portion of a platonic solid), and elements of the combined mass of the female figure and the panther reflect the shape geometry of the forms of the female (Bacchantin). Part of this combined shape of the Bacchantin and panther start at the lateral proximal left external oblique (where the narrowing of the waist ends and the waist begins to proceeds out) of Bacchantin which proceeds in a horizontal arch accross Bacchantin’s torso, over her right wrist / hand to the top head of the panther, down with and at the angle of the folds of drapery, accross the vertical stump element, including the panther torso, hip, pre tail at tail base, to leg angled forward; the opposite side being the hip, and legs of Bacchantin through the ankle accross to the lower forward fold of cloth at the center base, and including the front turning of the square base. This shape is also demensional – the interior portion of this shape area: the panthers right elecronon (elbow) area, and Bacchantin’s left patella (knee) area, project forward together representing the same geometry as the glabella – between the supercilliary promenence’s (forhead shape projection forward between eyebrows region). /// The same geometry of the whole shape of the panther & Bacchantin first described can be seen in the head of Bacchantin as seen at the narrow top of Bacchantin’s head just past the coronal suture / proximal parietal down both sides of the head to the lateral lower cheek bones, zygomatic and mass of the cheeks angled inward as proceeding distally / lower cheeks aligned with the lower nose, because of foreshortening the appearence of the shape ending at the lower lip / proximal mentalis (top chin). //// The proximal zyphoid around to both side of the projected 7th. intercostal out to the external mass of the rib cage and returning to the proximal (top) platform of the belly button tranverse ligiment, – reflect the same shape again, in the same right side up position as the panther Bacchantin shape element already mentioned.

All through this specific geometry is diplayed. Because photography flattens shape, and only shows gradations of light, not geometric form, these examples are a bit difficult to see three dimensionally. Also this is a very simplistic example of the order of shape geometry I have described, used as possible with the source picture.}, - bloger, PBP

was a famous German animal sculptor 19. Century, towards. the animal Wolff.

After the training in the royal iron foundry in Berlin and with the royal institute for trade (to the forerunner DO Berlin) he extended his knowledge of the casting technology not least by the promotion Beuths with Soyer in Paris and in Munich with Johann Baptist Stiglmaier. Subsequently, it made itself independent in Berlin with its own bildgiesserei, which it handed to his brother over Albert later. He dedicated himself to the plastic representation of animals to a large extent.

It was represented since 1839 on the exhibitions of the Prussian academy of the arts and became 1865 member of the academy.

works [Work on]

  • Eagle relief for the eight bases of the lock bridge in Berlin center;
  • ((The Sachsenross before the Welfenschloss in Hanover.)) The Sachsenross is clear from sculptor Albert Wolff!!!

literature: [Work on]

  • Bildwerke from three centuries in Hanover. Described of Gert of the east. Taken up by Hildegard Mueller. Hrsg. of the art association Hanover to its 125jährigen existence. Munich: Bruckmann 1957, P. 100-101 (Sachsenross before the University of Hanover).
Person data

- 

-

AMMANATI, Bartolomeo, – Leda with the Swan, Marble
Museo Nazionale del Bargello, Florence, Italy

-

-

Ammanati Bartolomao, Leda with the Swan, Museo Nationale de Bargello, Florence, Italy

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Christophe-Gabriel Allegrain (Paris, 1710-1795)-

Bather, also called Venus
1767
M.R. 1747

-

-

Christophe-Gabriel ALLEGRAIN – Paris, 1710 – Paris, 1795
Bather, also called Venus
1767
Musée du Louvre, Paris, France,

Marble
H. 1.74 m; W. 0.62 m; D. 0.675 m
Seized during the Revolution, 1793; entered the Louvre before 1824

{ A “beautiful, beautiful, sublime figure”
A “beautiful, beautiful, sublime figure; even the most beautiful, they say, the most beautiful figure of a woman the moderns have created,” Diderot enthused at the 1767 Salon. The statue could be seen in the sculptor’s studio, where it was admired by one and all. The delicately worked marble imbued the nude with the elasticity and sensuality of real flesh.

The work that launched the sculptor

The work launched the career of a hitherto unknown artist. Diderot wrote in a letter to his friend the sculptor Étienne-Maurice Falconet, in May 1768, “Well, that Allegrain, whom I’d never heard of, has just done a bathing Venus that has the admiration of even the masters of art.” In 1755, before awarding this royal commission to Allegrain, the Marquis of Marigny, Director of the King’s Buildings, had sought the advice of Charles-Nicolas Cochin, engraver, keeper of the king’s cabinet of drawings, and historiographer of the Académie Royale de Peinture et de Sculpture, who exerted great influence in artistic politics. The latter had to admit that the only known work by the artist was Narcissus, his admission piece for the Académie. Allegrain was nevertheless given the commission, no doubt owing to the influence of his brother-in-law, Jean-Baptiste Pigalle, the most famous sculptor under Louis XV. But he was delivered a faulty block of marble, full of veins and bluish marks. The plaster, shown at the 1757 Salon, aroused little attention, but ten years later the marble created a sensation. Louis XV offered it to his mistress, Madame Du Barry, who placed it in the park of her home, the Château de Louveciennes, and commissioned from the artist a pendant, Diana and Actaeon (Louvre). The two sculptures, seized during the Revolution, entered the Louvre before 1824.

Antique proportions and naturalistic sensuality

The figure, whose proportions were praised by a critic of the time, exudes simplicity and naturalness, the distinctive qualities of antique statuary. Yet Allegrain’s Venus does not explicitly refer to any antique model, although it does have the serpentine fluidity of the works of Giambologna (1529-1608), an Italian sculptor of Flemish origin who had greatly influenced European sculpture. In particular, it has affinities with the “Bather Placing Her Foot on a Perfume Vase,” a 17th-century bronze copy of which is in the Musée de la Chartreuse, Douai, notably that figure’s sinuous contours, lowered shoulder, small breasts, and very elaborate plaited hairstyle (which Allegrain improves upon). Yet he is not sculpting the firm, idealized body of a goddess but the carnal reality of a woman. She has folds on her stomach, hips, and arms. The pose of the head, facial expression, and the refinement of the hairstyle exude sensual charm. There is a faint smile on her face and a twinkle in the slightly contracted left eye. The forward-leaning head is very daring, considering the fragility of marble. Allegrain created a “bridge” of hair between head and back to support and counterbalance it, and in so doing combines beautiful details and overall clarity. } Text from the Louvre

-

 

-

-

-

-

Diane by Christophe-Gabriel Allegrain

(Paris 11 October 1710 — Paris 1795) was a French sculptor who tempered a neoclassical style with Rococo charm and softness, under the influence of his much more famous brother-in-law, Jean-Baptiste Pigalle.

His single most famous work, a marble Bather (La Baigneuse), was commissioned for the royal residences through the Bâtiments du Roi in 1755; a modelled sketch was shown at the Salon of 1757. When the finished marble was finally exhibited at the Salon of 1767 it received a sensational reception. In 1772 Louis XV presented it to Mme du Barry for her Château de Louveciennes, where she had recently completed the famed pavilion that introduced the new Neoclassicism, usually associated with the “Louis Seize style”, into court circles. After the King’s death she was pleased enough with it to commission from Allegrain a pendant bather in 1776, which he delivered in 1778 (illustration). presented in the landscape garden as Vénus and Diane they provided an allegory of her past sensual love and her present chaste condition. (Both are conserved in the Louvre Museum.) There are small-scale patinated bronze reproductions, and both pieces remained popular and often reproduced through the nineteenth century: in 1860, when the Goncourt brothers referred to “the refined legs of a Diana of Allegrain”,[1] their readers conjured up the familiar image.

His portrait by Joseph Duplessis, 1774, earned the painter a place in the Académie Royale de Peinture et de Sculpture. Among his pupils were his son and François-Dominique-Aimé Milhomme.

-

-

-

-

La Toilette d’Atalante by Jean-Jacques Pradier (James), Louvre, Paris, France

-

-

-

Jean-Jacques PRADIER, dit James
Genève, 1790 – Bougival, 1852

Les Trois Grâces
Marbre, salon de 1831
H. : 1,72 m. ; L. : 1,02 m. ; Pr. : 0,45 m.

Le modèle en plâtre était achevé en 1825.

-

Augustin CAYOT (1667-1772)
The Death of Dido
1711
M.R. 1780

-

Augustin CAYOT (1667-1772)
The Death of Dido
1711
Musée du Louvre, Paris, France,

Reception piece for the Academy, 1711
Marble
H. 86.8 cm; W. 55 cm; D. 59 cm
Seized from the collections of the Academy during the Revolution, 1793; probably entered the Louvre in 1849

 

 

 

NAME Wolff, Friedrich William
SHORT DESCRIPTION German animal sculptor
DATE OF BIRTH 6. April 1814
PLACE OF BIRTH Fehrbellin
DYING DATE 30. May 1887
  Berlin-Antonio ABONDIO | Portrait of Faustina Romana (obverse); Leda and the swan (reverse)-Antonio ABONDIO | Portrait of Faustina Romana (obverse); Leda and the swan (reverse)-Antonio ABONDIO (Italy 1538 – Austria 1591), Portrait of Faustina Romana (obverse); Leda and the swan (reverse), National Gallery of AustraliaThe subject of the medal, Faustina the Roman, has been identified as ‘a courtesan celebrated by Joachim du Bellay, who was in Rome from 1553 to 1558, and possibly identical with the Faustina who excited the passion of Brantôme.’ The legend may be completed as Favstina ro(mana) o(mnium) p(ulcherrima), or the Roman Faustina, of every beauty. Her portrait bust is in the classical antique style: left profile, drapery, hairstyle and jewellery – earrings, necklace and hair fillet.

The reverse depicts the Greek myth of Leda and the swan. Leda is the wife of the king of Sparta, who is seduced (or raped) by Zeus in the guise of a swan; from their union is born Helen of Troy. The Roman name for Zeus was Jupiter or Jove. The legend si Iovi.quid homini implies if Jove does this, what of men? The theme was a common one for Renaissance artists. Abondio takes advantage of the tondo format by accentuating the curve of the swan’s wings, and repeats the rhythmical bend of the swan’s neck in Leda’s limbs.

{ The Death of Dido

Dido, Queen of Carthage, was abandoned by Aeneas and killed herself in despair. For his reception piece at the Academy in 1711, Cayot treated this dramatic Virgilian episode with virtuosity, neglecting neither the drama of the moment nor the sensuality of the abandoned queen.

Description

The iconography

Dido, the founder and queen of Carthage, has just been abandoned by the Trojan hero Aeneas, son of Venus, gone in search of a new kingdom. She decides to kill herself on a pyre built to burn her faithless lover’s possessions. The theme is taken from Virgil’s Aeneid (written in the 1st century BC), which recounts the legendary adventures of Aeneas: his flight after the sack of Troy by the Greeks, and his journey to Italy where he was to found the Roman Empire.

Death and sensuality

The scene is theatrical: the queen, kneeling on the pyre, eyes raised heavenward, plunges her lover’s sword into her breast, thrusting the sheath behind her with her left arm. A few drops of blood flow from the wound.
Tragedy and sensuality are closely mingled here: Dido’s suicidal pose, as she kneels on a soft cushion, is both elegant and revealing. Her fine tunic, open at her breast, shows the line of her thigh; the flowing cloak that has slipped from her shoulder is held in place at the hip by a finely-worked clasp, and a lock of hair emphasizes the nudity of her shoulder.

A virtuoso work

Cayot demonstrated his skillful rendering of textures with this funeral pyre: an artful pile of branches, logs, and Aeneas’s armor. The Trojan hero’s helmet with its plumed crest is an enormous fish head with an evil-looking eye, its gaping mouth turned toward the spectator.
The artist presented this virtuoso work for his admission into the Royal Academy of Painting and Sculpture on 31 December 1711. In the 18th century, sculpture in the round replaced the bas-relief work previously required by the institution. } Text from the Louvre

-

Jean THIERRY (1669-1739)
Leda and the Swan
1717
M.R. 2100

-

Jean THIERRY – Lyon, 1669 – Lyon, 1739
Léda et le cygne
Musée du Louvre

-

Jean THIERRY – Lyon, 1669 – Lyon, 1739
Léda et le cygne
M.R. 2100
Sculptures

-

Jean THIERRY – Lyon, 1669 – Lyon, 1739
Léda et le cygne
Musée du Louvre

-

Jean THIERRY – Lyon, 1669 – Lyon, 1739
Léda et le cygne
M.R. 2100
Sculptures

-

Jean THIERRY – Lyon, 1669 – Lyon, 1739
Léda et le cygne
M.R. 2100
Sculptures

-

Jean THIERRY – Lyon, 1669 – Lyon, 1739
Léda et le cygne
Musée du Louvre, Paris, France

Reception piece for the Academy, 1717
Marble
H. 81 cm; W. 40 cm; D. 44 cm
Seized from the collections of the Academy during the Revolution, 1793; entered the Louvre in 1849

{ Leda and the Swan

Leda, Queen of Sparta, was seduced by Jupiter in the form of a swan. Jean Thierry’s Academy diploma piece in 1717 was an unusual one: although this type of subject had often been treated since the 16th century, tragic themes were generally preferred for admission to the Academy. The story of Leda corresponded to the light and libertine style that Thierry promulgated at the Spanish court of King Philip V.

Description

The theme

The god Jupiter fell in love with Leda, the mortal queen of Sparta. He came to her in the form of a swan, and seduced her while she was bathing in the river. This story is told by Ovid in his Metamorphoses – an early 1st-century work recounting the transformations of gods and mortals into plants or animals, which was a primary source of artistic inspiration from the Renaissance onward. The painter Antoine Coypel, director of the Royal Academy of Painting and Sculpture, imposed this theme on the sculptor Thierry in 1714 for his diploma piece. The bas-reliefs which had previously been required for Academy admission were replaced in the 18th century by statuettes sculpted in the round. The majority of pieces had tragic, violent, themes, such as Guillaume I Coustou’s Hercules at the Stake (1704, in the Louvre), François Dumont’s Titan (1712, in the Louvre), René Charpentier’s Death of Meleager (1713, in the Louvre), or Jean-Baptiste Lemoyne’s Death of Hippoytus (1715, in the Louvre). Thierry’s Leda, on the other hand, comes from a rarer romantic mythology.

Thierry’s libertine style

Leda was a recurrent motif in erotic art from the Italian Renaissance, treated by artists such as Da Vinci and Michelangelo. Thierry’s approach to the theme has voluptuous elegance and grace. Leda’s pose (sitting with one leg bent behind her, one arm across her body, and her head in profile) was inspired by the Nymph with a Quiver and Nymph with a Dove (in the Louvre) by Coustou, Thierry’s master at Versailles. In this work, however, the contrapposto is accentuated, and the attitude more lascivious. Leda’s body is brought to life by the upward movement of the swan that envelops her with its wings, its webbed foot on her left thigh; she is turning to the swan, her right hand on its shoulder, her left caressing its neck. The protagonists are gazing into each other’s eyes with obvious desire. The spiraling forms intertwine in a swirling shape that confers a multitude of viewpoints to the group. The sculptor played with textures too, using the ridges on the swan’s feathers, Leda’s braided hair, and the grooves on the plinth, to highlight the smooth sheen of the queen’s body.
Thierry promulgated this light and libertine style at the Court of Spain where he stayed from 1721 to 1728, on the invitation of King Philip V, to work with René Frémin on the sculptures in the gardens of La Granja, near Segovia. } Text fromthe Louvre

-

-

Head of a satyr. Greek Copy after a statue (ca. 100 BC)., Room 13 (Saal des Knaben mit der Gans), Munich Glyptothek, Munich, Germany

-

-

PAN, Museum Collection: Musée du Louvre, Paris, France, catalogue Number: Louvre Ma 266,
Title: “Pan”, M
aterial: Marble, Height: 1.58 metres, Copy: during Roman Imperial period Greek sculptors hired to copy a Greek statue from group by Heliodorus of Rhodes C2nd BC, Style: Hellenistic, Date: C2nd AD
Period: Imperial Roman,
The goat-legged god Pan seated on a rock holding a flute. Once part of a statue group depicting the instruction

-

-

PAN & GOAT, Museum Collection: Museo Archeologico Nazionale di Napoli, Naples, Italy
Title: “Pan copulating with goat”, m
aterial: Marble, Period: Imperial Roman Greek hired to copy earlier Greek sculpture, The goatish god Pan copulating with a nanny-goat.

-

-

HYGEIA, Museum Collection: State Hermitage Museum, St Petersburg, Russia, “Hygeia”
Material: Marble, He
ight: 0.87 metres, Copy: Greeks hired during Roman Imperial period to copy Greek statue
Date: C1st AD,
Hygeia (Good Health personified) sits feeding a serpent from a bowl.

-

-

HYGEIA, Museum Collection: Palazzo Corsini, Rome, Italy, “Hygeia”, material: Marble, copy during Imperial Roman period by Greek sculptors of a Greek statue, Hygeia (Good Health personified) feeding a serpent from a bowl.

-

-

SEILENOS, Museum Collection: Museo Pio-Clementino, Musei Vaticani, Vatican City, Title: “Silenus”
Material: Marble, Seilenos with wreath of cones, panther skin, club, feeding panther cub.

-

-

SEILENOS & INFANT DIONYSOS, Museum Collection: Museo Archeologico Nazionale di Napoli, Naples, Italy
Catalogue Number: TBA, Title: “Silenus & infant Dionysus “, Material: Marble –
Period: Imperial Roman, Greek sculptors hired to make copies or varients

The horse-eared god Seilenos clashing cymbals and carrying the infant Dionysos on his shoulders. Beside him draped over a rock are a deer-skin cape and pan-pipes.

-

-

IKHTHYOKENTAUROS & SEILENOS, Museum Collection: Musée du Louvre, Paris, France
Catalogue Number: Ma 3091, Title: “Marine Centaur and Silenus “, Material: Marble
Height: 1.15 metres, Context: Discovered Esquilin Mount, Rome, Original / Copy: Roman copy of a Greek statue from a group by Scopas C4th BC
Style: Hellenistic, Date: C1st – C2nd AD, Period: Imperial Roman

The fat old god Seilenos rides on the back of a youthful Ikhthyokentauros (fish-tailed marine centaur).

-

-

KENTAUROS & EROS, Museum Collection: Musée du Louvre, Paris, France, Title: “Centaur & Cupid”, Material: Marble
Height: 1.47 metres, Context: Discovered Rome, Original / Copy: Roman copy of Greek statue by a sculptor of Aphrodisias in Anatolia
Style: Hellenistic, Date: C1st – C2nd AD, Period: Imperial Roman

The winged godling Eros (love personified) seated on the back of a centaur.

-

-

-

-

Old Centaur teased by love. Greeks hired by Romans during Roman period to make a copy, or a varient of an earlier work,

(1st–2nd centuries AD) of a Greek original of the 2nd century BC. Marble, found in Rome in the 17th century, Borghese Collection; purchase, 1807, Department of Greek, Etruscan and Roman Antiquities, Sully wing, ground floor, room 17, Louvre Museum, Paris, France

-

-

Aristeas and Papias of Aphrodisias, So-called “Old Centaur”: centaur teased by Eros (missing). Grey-black marble, Roman copy after an Hellenistic original., H 1.34 m (4 ft. 4 ¾ in.), From the Villa Adriana near Tivoli, 1736, Palazzo Nuovo, first hall, great hall, Musei Capitolini, Rome, Italy

-

-

-

Aristeas and Papias of Aphrodisias, KENTAUROS “FURIETTI CENTAUR”, So-called “Old Centaur”: centaur teased by Eros (missing)., Grey-black marble, Roman copy after an Hellenistic original. From the Villa Adriana near Tivoli

Museum Collection: Museo Capitolino, Rome, Italy, Title: “Furietti Centaur ” , Period: Imperial Roman, Greek sculptors in Aphrodisias hired by Roman patrons, A half horse, half man centaur.

-

-

Aristeas and Papias of Aphrodisias (signature on the plinth), So-called “Young Centaur”: young centaur mocking Love’s wounds (Eros missing). Grey-black marble, Roman copy after an Hellenistic original. Musei Capitolini, Rome, Italy

-

-

SATYROS & PAN, Museum Collection: Museo Pio-Clementino, Musei Vaticani, Vatican City, Material: Marble,
Period: Imperial Roman, Greek sculptors hired to make varients or copies

 

A small goat-legged Pan plucking a thorn from the foot of a Satyros. The Satyros has animal ears, deer-skin cloak, wine skin, and a wreath of small pine cones.

-

-

SATYROS & PAN,

Museum Collection: Musée du Louvre, Paris, France
Material: Marble
Period: Imperial Roman
 
 
 
 

 

SUMMARY

A small goat-legged Pan plucking a thorn from the foot of a horse-eared Satyros.

ARTICLES

Satyroi, Pan

-

-

S39.6 SATYROS

Museum Collection: State Hermitage Museum, St Petersburg, Russia
Catalogue Number: TBA
Title: “Dancing Satyr”
Class: Free-standing statue
Material: Marble
Height: 1.86 metres
Context:
Original / Copy: Roman copy of Greek statue
Style:
Date: C2nd AD
Period: Imperial Roman

SUMMARY

A horse-eared Satyros with deer skin cape and staff.

-

-

S39.7 SATYROS

Museum Collection: Museo Pio-Clementino, Musei Vaticani, Vatican City
Catalogue Number: TBA
Title:
Class: Free-standing statue
Material: Marble
Height:
Context:
Original / Copy:
Style:
Date:
Period: Imperial Roman

SUMMARY

A Satyros playing a pipe, with animal skin cape draped beside him.

-

 

-

Italiano: Ariete in bronzo, del sec. III a.C. Ora al Museo archeologico regionale di Palermo

 

-

 

-

Ariete in bronzo, del sec. III a.C. Ora al Museo archeologico regionale di Palermo,

-

-

Italiano: Ariete in bronzo, del sec. III a.C. Ora al Museo archeologico regionale di Palermo,

 

-

-

Museo Regionale Archeologico, Palermo
Bronze of a ram.
 
 
 
 

 

 

-

-

Copy of Boethos of Chalcedon, Child strangling a goose. Marble, Roman copy after a bronze original from ca. 300 BC., Galleria dei Candelabri, Vatican, Vatican City, Rome, Italy

-

-

Louvre Museum, Paris, France

-

Child playing with a goose. Roman copy (1st–2nd centuries AD) of a Greek original of the 2nd century BC. Marble, found in 1792 in the Quintilii Villa, by the Via Appia, not far from Rome. Other copies are now shown in the Glyptothek of Munich and in the Vatican Museums. Former Braschi Collection, seized in application of the Tolentino Treaty, Department of Greek, Etruscan and Roman Antiquities, Sully wing, ground floor, room 17, Louvre Museum, Paris, France

-

-

Copy of Boethos of Chalcedon, Child playing with a goose. Roman copy after a Greek work from the 2nd century BC. Room 13 (Saal des Knaben mit der Gans), Munick Glyptothek, Munick, Germany

-

Naples, National Archaeological Museum, erotic art collection, paintings and objects from Pompeii [Napoli, Museo Archeologico Nazionale, collezione erotica, rilievo marmoreo con Ninfa e vecchio Satiro, da Ercolano, I secolo d.c.]

-

Ninfa e vecchio Satiro, da Ercolano, I secolo d.c.], Museo Archeologico Nazionale Napaoli, Npales, Italy

-

Naples, National Archaological Museum, erotic art collection, paintings and objects from Pompeii [Napoli, Museo Archeologico Nazionale, collezione erotica]

-

venerest, – Museo Archeologico Nazionale Napoli, Naples, Italy

-

 

venerest-a-Prostitute-in-gold-lace-marble-Museo-Archaeologico-Natl-Naples

venerest-a-Prostitute-in-gold-lace-marble-Museo-Archaeologico-Natl-Naples

 

Kallipygos Aphrodite, Kallipygos is Greek for with a beautiful rump Greco-Roman marble copy after a Greek Hellenistic bronze, Naples National Archaeology Museum

Kallipygos Aphrodite, Kallipygos is Greek for with a beautiful rump Greco-Roman marble copy after a Greek Hellenistic bronze, Naples National Archaeology Museum

Kallipygos Aphrodite, Kallipygos is Greek for with a beautiful rump Greco-Roman marble copy after a Greek Hellenistic bronze, Naples National Archaeology Museum

Kallipygos Aphrodite, Kallipygos is Greek for with a beautiful rump Greco-Roman marble copy after a Greek Hellenistic bronze, Naples National Archaeology Museum

Kallipygos Aphrodite, Kallipygos is Greek for with a beautiful rump Greco-Roman marble copy after a Greek Hellenistic bronze, Naples National Archaeology Museum

Kallipygos Aphrodite, Kallipygos is Greek for with a beautiful rump Greco-Roman marble copy after a Greek Hellenistic bronze, Naples National Archaeology Museum

Kallipygos Aphrodite, Kallipygos is Greek for with a beautiful rump Greco-Roman marble copy after a Greek Hellenistic bronze, Naples National Archaeology Museum

Kallipygos Aphrodite, Kallipygos is Greek for with a beautiful rump Greco-Roman marble copy after a Greek Hellenistic bronze, Naples National Archaeology Museum

 

Kallipygos Aphrodite, Kallipygos is Greek for with a beautiful rump Greco-Roman marble copy after a Greek Hellenistic bronze, Naples National Archaeology Museum

Kallipygos Aphrodite, Kallipygos is Greek for with a beautiful rump Greco-Roman marble copy after a Greek Hellenistic bronze, Naples National Archaeology Museum

Kallipygos Aphrodite, Kallipygos is Greek for with a beautiful rump Greco-Roman marble copy after a Greek Hellenistic bronze, Naples National Archaeology Museum
Kallipygos Aphrodite, Kallipygos is Greek for with a beautiful rump Greco-Roman marble copy after a Greek Hellenistic bronze, Naples National Archaeology Museum
Kallipygos Aphrodite, Kallipygos is Greek for with a beautiful rump Greco-Roman marble copy after a Greek Hellenistic bronze, Naples National Archaeology Museum
Kallipygos Aphrodite, Kallipygos is Greek for with a beautiful rump Greco-Roman marble copy after a Greek Hellenistic bronze, Naples National Archaeology Museum

Sculpture Monuments associated with the architect Bruno Schmitz (1858 – 1916).

1

Aphrodite, 19th. century German, FriederichswerderscheKirch, Schinkel Museum designed by Karl Frederich Schinkel – architect 1822 – 1823

Venus Callypige, Napoli

{This sculpture is influenced by the Venus Callypige, Napoli, Hellenistic sculpture pictured below. The German sculpture of Aphrodite is not as sophisticated in form-content, or as gracefull as the Greek Venus Callypige sculpture. Will include Greek Hellenistic sculpture later in these Blog postings. Further on in the blog postings are explanations of form-content in Greek Hellenistic, and Classical Greek sculpture that are standards for the best European traditional sculpture.}, bloger, PBP

The National Archaelogical Museum of Naples can be considered one of the most important cultural centres in the world in terms of the quantity and quality of Greek and Roman relics it contains.

-
Afrodite
-
the Venus Callypige, from an Hellenistic original
-
-
Völkerschlachtdenkmal – It was arranged considerably by the sculptors Christian Behrens and Franz Metzner. – The people battle monument at the edge of the city Leipzig is with its 91 m height the largest German national monument. It was built between 1897 and 1913 on behalf the “German Patriotenbundes” by the architect Bruno Schmitz (1858 – 1916). It is to remind of the people battle in October 1813, by which Napoleon Bonapartes despotism over Europe was crucially weakened.

By the example of the 100jährigen planning and draft history of the monument the author shows the change of the German nationalism during 19. Century and its effects on the forming arts, in particular architecture, up. Both at the beginning and at the end 19. Century was there in Germany a radical refusal of the antique art from nationalistic motives and a turn too allegedly “Germanic” styles. Karl Friedrich Schinkel planned a gothical cathedral for Berlin, in order to tie to the alleged gloss time of the German Reich in the Middle Ages.
The cross mountain monument in Berlin is the modest result of Schinkels soaring cathedral fantasies – an all-German monument was not the German princes and kings after 1815 opportun; besides one had become impoverished by the long war years. But the Prussian king Friedrich William III. (1797 – 1840) did not have to konzedieren the people, who had along-fought for the victory over Napoleon, if already the promised political condition, so at least a monument.

The monument is an early example of the Stilpluralismus 19. Century: the conscious choice of formal models from different historical epochs, which were occupied with different meanings in each case. The architectural large form is shared to the Fialentürmchen gothical cathedrals and is to remind of the medieval German Reich – at this time one falsely believed that the gothic had arisen from “German nature”. The genius figures in the niches are however antikisierend, committed to the human ideal and show the Porträts of Prussian Royalties and generals.

-

-

Karl Friedrich Schinkel planned a gothical cathedral for Berlin, in order to tie to the alleged gloss time of the German Reich in the Middle Ages.
The cross mountain monument in Berlin is the modest result of Schinkels soaring cathedral fantasies – an all-German monument was not the German princes and kings after 1815 opportun; besides one had become impoverished by the long war years. But the Prussian king Friedrich William III. (1797 – 1840) did not have to konzedieren the people, who had along-fought for the victory over Napoleon, if already the promised political condition, so at least a monument.

The monument is an early example of the Stilpluralismus 19. Century: the conscious choice of formal models from different historical epochs, which were occupied with different meanings in each case. The architectural large form is shared to the Fialentürmchen gothical cathedrals and is to remind of the medieval German Reich – at this time one falsely believed that the gothic had arisen from “German nature”. The genius figures in the niches are however antikisierend, committed to the human ideal and show the Porträts of Prussian Royalties and generals.

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-

The “internationalist” Leo Klenze (1784 – 1864) sketched a temple in classical Greek forms, in order to remind and after 20 years war a reconciliation between the European peoples demand of the common European cultural heritage: “The monument, by which Europe geeinte provided, should be also its common possession. Established in the center of the continent, it is to serve its combination for the celebration of paneuropäischer celebrations… the nations to become the symbolic place to find here.”

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

-

The draft of the Karlsruher architect Friedrich Weinbrenner, (architect of Karlsruhe) for a “Teut national temple” from the year 1814 (fig. right) Bruno Schmitz finally served the architect 1897 as typologisches model for the VSD: a zweigeschossiges Mausoleum, which is posed on a high base like that that it resembles a Stufenpyramide. The front of the base projectile, which wine burner conceived “in shape of a gothischen fortress”, is covered of an enormous relief, which brings up for discussion the people battle. Over it rises a several times gradated solidium, which saves a zweigeschossigen central room, whose dome should be carried by palm trunks.

 

 

 

 

 

-
Up to the establishment of realm 1871 the people battle represented an important point of reference in German political history. 18 October, the decision day of the four-day Leipziger battle – the Saxonian and württembergischen troops had changed the front on this day and had further-fought on sides of the Allierten (Austria, Prussia, Russia, Sweden) against Napoleon – became increasing the protest day that by the princes suppressed liberal-democratic movement: the waiting castle celebration 1817 took place e.g. on 18 October. To the 50-jährigen anniversary 1863 met on the battleground a large crowd, which wanted to demonstrate for a united Germany. Also by artists new monument plans were sketched again and again, by which however none was realized.
By the fast and berauschenden victory over France 1870/71 the people battle lost its meaning. The “realm” was geeint by Bismarck and Prussian military – the monument activity, which was verhöhnt of critical contemporaries as “monument plague”, concentrated on this event.
Only into the 1890er years moved the people battle and the völkisch nationalistische ideology developed during the wars of liberation again in the political interest. The dismissal of Bismarck by the young emperor Wilhelm II. 1890 led to an alienation between the emperor house and far parts of the middle class; a forming civil “national opposition”, for an extension of German power by colonial policy occurred in particular (establishment of the allGerman federation 1890) made front increasing against as too reservedly felt official imperial policy. Emperors and “national opposition” therefore rivaled in the following years who would represent the “national interests” better. Patriotismus mutated to an always engstirniger and more aggressively becoming chauvinistism. After death emperors Wilhelms the Ith 1888 conceived everywhere in the German Reich national monuments are a faithful mirror image of this political conflict.
-
 

 

 

-

Excursion: One of the most outstanding examples of this group of monuments represents the Kyffhäuser monument in Thuringia, sketched by Bruno Schmitz. The monument plant bekrönt a long-drawn-out ridge, for many centuries in which the people legend after the medieval Stauferkaiser Friedrich Ith Barbarossa (1122 – 1190) for the renewal of the realm unit waited. The entire ikonografische program aims at it off, the new, from Prussia controlled empire as a legitimate successor of the 1806 of Napoleon of dissolved medieval realm to represent.

The center of the extensive monument complex form the all outstanding, with an emperor crown covered tower, an emperor William rider monument platziertes before it and this the pre-aged, into the rock plateau sank Barbarossa yard. Exactly over the Barbarossafigur gehauenen of Nikolaus violonist from the stone (fig. down right) rises the again-baroque rider monument of William I. – the again-German Kaisertum presents itself as from the traditions of the old person of realm adult power.

-

-

The rider monument of William I. is held in again-baroque forms and corresponds thereby to the taste and representation need of the emperor completely. The architecture of Bruno Schmitz orients itself however strongly at the form canon of the Romanesque, the architectural style prevailing during the medieval German Kaiser era: heavy compact forms, Rundbögen, Zahnschnittfries etc. embossment right parallelepiped and grobbehauene components remind of castles of the Staufer period.

The figure of the Stauferkaisers red beard in the lowest part of the monument plant is in one of several richly decorated Archivolten over fan genes dazzling niche. Barbarossa seems straight from the sleep awaked; its long beard and the fold-rich garb link it closely with the rock, on which the monument ensemble rises. The Physiognomie is not authentic, since by Barbarossa none is delivered with individual face courses haven-guessed/advised.

The Kyffhäuserdenkmal carries still another expressed compromise character between emperors and “people” – both are represented, although stylistic already separate: the Kaisertum in the again-baroque sculpture, the “people” in again-Roman architecture.

-

-

The contemporaneous, likewise 1897 inaugurated emperor William national monument in Berlin postulated however not only by its location – opposite the Eosander portal of the city lock – the requirement for however of the emperor to represent the German nation. The yard sculptor Reinhold Begas placed the rider statue of William I. on a high base in the center of the plant. A again-baroque portico on u-shaped sketch behind-caught the emperor led by a Victoria; two Quadrigen, which should represent north and South Germany, flanked it. A multiplicity of lions, eagles, Rossen and other Getier equipped the monument ensemble and arranged a contemporary Spötter to be occupied with the “Zoologie of the imperial monuments” more near. Architecture and allegorisch loaded plastics are completely the will and taste emperor Wilhelms II accordingly “again baroque”.

(The monument was blown up – just like the lock – after the Second World War.)

-

-

The Leipziger people battle monument can be understood as “völkische” answer to citizens of Berlin the emperor William monument. Because the “national opposition” could itself with this emperor monument in again-baroque, i.e. abroad forms did not develop to identify. In Leipzig a monument in national style should be set for the nation; but such had to be developed only.

Picture right: Bruno Schmitz, architect of the Kyffhäuser and the people battle monument.

-

-

The struggle for a “national architectural style” required a pre and a main competition – finally the choice fell on Bruno Schmitz. This fell back to wine burner draft, modified this however crucially, it in the sense of the völkischen nationalism around 1900 “was germanisiert”: all construction elements such as columns, originating from the antique Formenfundus, were eliminated, since they were regarded as foreign and “in an un-German manner”. All forms were simplified and archaisiert. Grobbehauene Rustikaquader disguise the lower parts of the monument and are the allegedly rough, urwüchsigen character of the German nation, to which European “Urvolk” lends expression.

-

 

 

-

The extensive bildhauerischen work on the people battle monument became of Christian Behrensbegun. Behrens created the Barbarossaköpfe at the front stairway string-boards, the fixed image of the pc. Michael armored with a latemedieval armament and this clasping enormous relief at the base of the monument (fig. right, detail), which was to represent the Leipziger battleground.

-

-

After the death of Behrens Metzner led those mourning Krieger in the circular crypt, the Personifikationen of the “German people virtues” (bravery, faith strength, people strength, victim readiness) in fame-resounds and the guard figures on the dome out. When models of the monumental virtue statues served the old-Egyptian Memnonsäulen with Theben.Während the work of Behrens from high level relating to crafts are and art nouveau be assigned can, a strongly archaisierende tendency is to be noticed with Metzner. The multiplicity of the armored Kriegergestalten at the monument reflects the fears of encirclement of the Germans before the First World War again.

-

-

Archaisierende and form-simplifying tendencies were around 1900 a totalEuropean phenomenon – one thought only of Picasso. The overripe European culture threatened to suffocate required of liberating impulses at its traditions and, also in the art. The specific at the people battle monument is however the chauvinististic impulse of its designers and the effort, an out not existing – Germanic traditions derived architecture and sculpture to develop.

Fig. right: Cross section of the VSD

-

-

Apart from the two “Barbarossa heads” at the front Stirnmauern, which refer to the medieval Roman-German Kaisertum, monument is not to any purchase to the again-German Kaisertum at the Leipziger.

 

Picture rights: The plans and drafts are the “German construction journal” and the “cent ral sheet of the building administration” (div. Expenditures between 1896 and 1913) taken. Farbbilder: Author

-

Eine Zusammenfassung meiner Thesen: Zur Baugeschichte des Völkerschlachtdenkmals in Leipzig. In: Vom Kult zur Kulisse. Das VSD als Gegenstand der Geschichtskultur. Hrsg. von K. Keller und H.-D. Schmid. Leipzig 1995.
Lexikon der Kunst. Seemann-Verlag Leipzig 1995. Stichwort: Völkerschlachtdenkmal

Rezensionen in: Journal of the society of architectural historians. Vol. LII Nr. 3, 1993. (Alan Gowans).
Nordost-Archiv – Zeitschrift für Regionalgeschichte. Neue Folge Bd. VI /1997 Heft 1. (Helmut Börsch-Supan).

-

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Völkerschlachtdenkmal

“Monument of the Battle of the Nations”) is a monument in Leipzig, Germany, to the Battle of Leipzig of 1813, also known as the Battle of the Nations. It is one of Leipzig’s main landmarks and the largest monument in Europe. Paid for entirely by donations and a lottery, independently of the state, it was completed in 1913 for the 100th anniversary of the battle.

There were Germans fighting on both sides, as Napoleon‘s troops included Germans from the French-occupied left bank of the Rhine as well as from the Confederation of the Rhine due to mandatory conscription. The monument commemorates Napoleon’s defeat at Leipzig. This was a crucial step towards the end of hostilities, which was, in essence, a victory for the German peoples. Additionally, it mourns the dead from all the nations involved, not only the German soldiers.

The structure is 91 metres tall, making it the tallest monument in Europe. It contains over 500 steps to a viewing platform at the top, from which there are spectacular views across the city and its environs. The structure makes extensive use of concrete, although the facings are of granite.

The monument is widely regarded as one of the best examples of Wilhelmine architecture, with several features comparable to sketches of the Temple of Solomon and the work of Freemasonry. It is said to stand on the spot of the bloodiest fighting, where Napoleon saw his army destroyed. The architect of the monument was Bruno Schmitz, and the carved figures, including the 5.5 metres (18 feet) high Totenwächter (“Guards of the Dead”, or “Keepers of the Vigil of the Dead”) are the work of sculptor Franz Metzner. The construction work took place over a period of 15 years under the direction of Clemens Thieme.

In front of the monument there is an artificial rectangular lake intended to symbolise the blood and tears shed during the wars. The so-called Régates de Baquet (a bathtub race) has taken place in this lake every year since 1991, an attempt to “unmonopolize” the so-called ideologies inherrent in such “overtly nationalistic structures”.

Some view its style as overbearing and pompous, and the statuary which dominates the entire structure is intended to evoke mythic images of Germanic heroism, of the sort propounded by Richard Wagner. If the monument has a nationalist tone, however, then it is in the sense that a nation should be united, rather than split into parts that are forced to fight each other, as Germans were obliged to in that battle.

Hitler exploited the monument to the full, and chose it as a frequent venue for his speeches when in Leipzig.

During the period of communist rule in East Germany, the government of the GDR was unsure whether it should allow the monument to stand, since it represented the staunch nationalism of the period of the German Empire. Eventually, it was decided that the monument should be allowed to remain, since it represented a battle in which Russian and German soldiers had fought together against a common enemy, and was therefore representative of “Russo-German Brotherhood-in-arms” (German: Deutsch-russische Waffenbrüderschaft).

The monument is currently under restoration, with work scheduled to be finished by 2013, the year of the two-hundredth anniversary.

The Monument of the Battle of Nations is located in the south-east of Leipzig and can be reached by tram lines 15 and 2 (stop: Völkerschlachtdenkmal).

-

-

Völkerschlachtdenkmal Leipzig under restoration

-

-

In der Krypta des Völkerschlachtdenkmals Leipzig mit Totenwächter

-

-

Krypta Völkerschlachtdenkmal

-

-

Erzengel Michael –

Völkerschlachtdenkmal

 

Entry for July 11, 2009
Entry for February 26, 2007 magnify

Aphrodite, FriederichswerderscheKirch, Schinkel Museum designed by Karl Frederich Schinkel – architect 1822 – 1823

-

Schmitz, Professor Bruno (1858-1916), architect and town planner

Contents:

Personal papers, documents, block letters over the people battle monument with Leipzig and other emperor monuments, press reports, architecture magazines, photo, pressures, designs, architect William angel (1914-16), photos of the families Schmitz and Schmitz Hillebrecht, travelogs, art nouveau architecture, geneological table

Extent: 2 current meters

1. Personal record
On 21.11. the 1858 Bruno Schmitz was born as a son of the Kleidermachers and cloth dealer Carl Theodor Schmitz and his Mrs. Henriette in the house of the family, Flingerstrasse 6, to Duesseldorf. According to statement of its birth certificate its complete name is actually George Bruno Schmitz. Over its childhood and his early school time no information is present.

After the attendance of the royal High School it visited first a private institute. Bruno Schmitz possessed an early inclination to painting and drawing and received outside of normal instruction private hours with the painter and Kupferstecher Heidland in Duesseldorf. First it played 1876 with its entrance into the academy of arts Duesseldorf 1875 with the thought painter to become, turned however on Veranlassung of its father of the architecture and came into the building class led by Professor Dr. Lotz. 1878 it successfully terminates its study and occurred the studio of the building master Riffarth, which was concerned straight with the new building of the Düsseldorfer academy of arts. There it was about four years active, whereby it visited further lectures as well as act and anatomy courses.

 

Also of other studios Bruno Schmitz was consulted for assistance. Like that it was at the building of the new arts center under Griese & walter, at the building of the condition house under J.C. Raschendorff and the Evangelist Johanneskirche by the studio Kyllmann & Heyden take part.

By some successes with local building competitions encouraged, he seized the courage to take part at boarding school internat. advertisements and obtained with the competition for the draft of a Victor Emauel monument 1883 in Rome on first attempt the first price. In same year it won the competitions for a house of artists in Amsterdam and the Austrian federal state museum in Linz a.d. Danube, whereby only the latter arrived at the execution.

1884 moved Bruno Schmitz to Leipzig, whereby he expected an introduction to the church architecture from a connection with August Hartel, which failed however, because the connection between the two became already after one year terminated. it changed 1885 to Berlin, where it implemented first only smaller work. It used the following phase of five years without larger work (apart from a weather column before the citizen of Berlin lock 1885 and the tomb for the family Hofmann 1888) to journeys to Italy, Holland, Belgium, France, South Germany and Austria.

1888 followed a journey to overseas, because he in the competition for the building of the victory column in Indianapolis the first price attained and the execution of construction could take over.

1891 he married Lucia Wanda Genelli, a granddaughter of the famous Italian draughtsman Bonaventura Genelli. From this marriage followed two daughters, Gabriele (1892 – 1962) and Angelika (1893 – 1957). Later his Mrs. Otto Hamann married. Bruno Schmitz was married in second marriage with Hedwig Schweicker. When this marriage was closed and from where Hedwig Schweicker came could not not be determined. General it is to be stated that to its private life hardly information is present.

At 1890 the largest work phase began. Planning and building of nearly all of its large monuments began in these years. In October 1896 it besides the title of a professor was lent by the Ministry for religious instruction and Medizinalangelegenheiten. Apparent it concerns here not around a normal Professur, but because of special earnings/services lent titles.
In the same year a set of emperor William monuments, which developed under its direction, was revealed.
The completion of its largest work, the people battle monument to Leipzig, for which it already submitted around 1895 first drafts, lasted until 1913, in order on the hundredth anniversary of the people battle to be solemnly opened.

After the turn of the century Bruno Schmitz more was concerned with the establishment of large public and private buildings. Few years before the First World War busy it itself again with monuments, this time for the realm founder of Bismarck.

The First World War did not set for its work for the time being an end, many buildings understood in planning could any more not be expenditure-led and new orders became with longer duration of the war RSR.

Bruno Schmitz died on 27.4. the 1916 at a heart impact in Berlin. Perhaps surprising, as in the Nekrologen is suggested, because from a letter within this collection (4-21-0-4.0004) it does not come out in such a way that it in February 1916 gotten sick heavily and had to let the studio work rest. Its urn was transferred on 11.9. 1917 into the crypt of the Kyffhäuser monument.

2. Bruno Schmitz and its work
Bruno Schmitz belonged to the largest monumental architects of the wilhelmischen era. Its style coined/shaped the monumental architecture of the Kaiser era also. Apart from a multiplicity of emperor monuments was responsible it with the building of large public buildings and firms. However the people battle monument is most well-known with Leipzig, the emperor William monument on the Kyffhäuser, at the German hits a corner with Koblenz and on the Porta Westfalica. To the large public too are its competition designs do not admit to the development plan of large Berlin and Duesseldorf. Straight ones with the drafts for Duesseldorf floated Bruno Schmitz already many elements forwards, which were only carried out after the 2ten world war and with the removal of the Federal Government to Berlin might perhaps also questions and ideas are raised, already the Bruno Schmitz before the First World War before-floated. Like today the Potsdamer place and Leipziger place stood already at that time in the center of the interest, likewise the planning of new central stations.

Its work is however not undisputedly, particularly its buildings of monumental affects the today’s art feeling darkly and heavily. Often, as in the wine house Rhine gold or with the figures in the people battle monument, one means to recognize similarities with the art hofierten in the national socialism (the speech is from a certain “Germanic type”). In addition however, this style is to be objected the national art feeling of its time quite corresponded and besides was Bruno Schmitz with plastics on the assistance by sculptors dependent, who brought in surely also their conceptions with.

The following overview of the work Bruno Schmitz’ens does not have a requirement on completeness. The list was arranged with the help of the material from the available collection and the literature existing in the university library Duesseldorf. It is not to be determined with all buildings clearly whether they were actually established. Also many smaller projects become, as residential buildings and other private orders in this list are missing. More exact clearing-up would surely give the thesis of Christian courage to Präger “the work of the architect Bruno Schmitz (1858 – 1916) with special consideration of the early work”, Heidelberg 1990, but it was not up to now possible unfortunately to see this work.

Overview of the work of the architect Bruno Schmitz:

 

  • 1. House at the island road, Duesseldorf, builds around 1883.
  • 2. Hotel imperial at the king Johann road to Dresden, builds 1885.
  • 3. Treasury to Dresden, builds approx. 1885.
  • 4. Weather column at the citizen of Berlin lock, 1885.
  • 5. Winner monument in Indianapolis, 1. Price 1888, exposure 1893.
  • 6. Concert hall in Zurich, builds – 1895 for 1892.
  • 7. Main building and water tower with restoration resounding on the citizens of Berlin industrial show 1896.
  • 8. Emperor Wilhelm monument on the Kyffhäuser, 1890 1. Price, exposure 1896.
  • 9. Emperor Wilhelm monument on the Porta Westfalica, 1892 1. Price, exposure 1896.
  • 10. Emperors Wilhelm monument at the German hit a corner, Koblenz, 1894 2. Price, exposure 1897.
  • 11. Empress Augusta monument in Koblenz, around 1896.
  • 12. Tomb for the family Hofmann, probably in Berlin around 1898.
  • 13. People battle monument to Leipzig, 1. Price 1896, re-writing of the draft 1898, exposure 1913.
  • 14. Palace for Carl Stollwerck in Cologne, builds – 1900 for 1899.
  • 15. Urban festival hall “rose garden” in Mannheim, builds – 1903 for 1899.
  • 16. Organization and converting of the Friedrichsplatzes in Mannheim, 1899 – 1903/1913.
  • 17. Mansion Hermann Stollwerck in Cologne, builds – 1903 for 1902.
  • 18. Grave monument for the family Kroner, Berlin 1903.
  • 19. German house on the world exhibition in pc. Louis, establishes – 1904 to 1903.
  • 20. House Bruno Schmitz, Berlin Charlottenburg, builds 1904.
  • 21. Automat house, Berlin Friedrichstr. , 1904 build 167 – 1906.
  • 22. Paper house (Gildenhaus), Berlin the-sourly STR. , 1906 build 2.
  • 23. Wine house Rhine gold, Berlin Bellevuestrasse, builds 1906.
  • 24. Grave monument ruffle on the Jerusalemer Kirchhof, Berlin 1907
  • 25. Country house white, small Machnow, around 1908.
  • 26. Konzertpavillon in the Kurpark to Luzern, establishes around 1908.
  • 27. Vestibül of the exhibition house cellar and pure, Berlin Potsdamer STR. 118b, um1910.
  • 28. Mansion Bondi, Berlin Nicolasee, around 1912.
  • 29. Country house Unger, Berlin Nicolasee, year of construction unclearly, probably similarly as mansion Bondi.

Those sketches was not implemented:

  • Victor Emanuel monument in Rome, 1. Price 1883
  • Emperor William national monument before the royal lock to Berlin, 1. Price 1890.
  • Bismarck national monument before Reichstag to Berlin, competition 1897.
  • Draft for the Charlottenburger bridge, competition 1903.
  • Bismarck monument in Hamburg, 3. Price 1903.
  • Yard theatre Stuttgart, competition 1908.
  • Tearing museum Mannheim, first drafts 1907, last draft 1914.
  • Large opera in Charlottenburg, competition 1909.
  • Bismarck national monument with being gene, competition 1910.
  • Town hall to Hanover, competition 1910.
  • Rhine bridge for Cologne, competition 1911.
  • Development plan large Duesseldorf, Wettbewerb 1911.
  • Development plan large Berlin, competition 1911.
  • Completion of the Freiberger of cathedral in Saxonia, competition 1911.
  • Bismarck control room westend with Berlin, competition 1911
  • Royal opera house, Berlin cure prince dam, competition 1912.
  • Large duke Friedrich monument in Mannheim, year and possible execution unclearly.

 

3. The deduction Bruno Schmitz
Actually it would be to be spoken more correctly from a collection to, because many pieces were probably gathered only reproductions and regarding Bruno Schmitz and the family Schmitz Hillebrecht. After a newspaper report (Rheini post office from 4.6. the 1959) the deduction arrived in the year 1959 into the possession city archives. According to the old listing, which was only roughly provided, director of regional court Schmitz Hillebrecht transferred the majority of the collection to 1959 in May. In February 1972 archives probably received Dr. Ottilie Thiemann Stodtner from Dachau from Mrs. under 4-21-0-1.0000, 4-21-0-4,0000 and 4-21-0-29,0000 summarized pieces and the personal design drawings in 4-21-0-30.0000, 4-21-0-31,0000 and 4-21-0-33.0000. Into January and November 1975 Dr. Ernst Schmidt Hillebrecht handed over particularly into 4-21-0-3.0000 and 4-21-0-12.0001 to 4-21-0-12,0024 put down photographies. In August 1978 over-right Emil Schmitz Hillebrecht the briefcase with the travelogs of Erich Kimbel (4-21-0-23.0000). Still the two Monographien were later added over the Monumento Nazionale into Rome (1984) and “thought and contributions to the production of a geneological table” (1986). The catalog “art nouveau architecture in Mannheim around 1900” (1985) is in the library of city archives.

 

Cutouts and specimen copies of the usual architecture magazines constitute the largest part of the collection. Besides several large sized plans and sketches are particularly delivered for the tearing museum in Mannheim and the people battle monument in Leipzig. To emphasize is a collection of nude drawings, which developed around 1890 in Berlin.

A part of these large plans and the nude drawings belong to the few pieces of original in this collection.

Furthermore an abundance from pictorial material to its buildings and monuments and an extensive collection are from newspaper cuttings to the building of the people battle monument. Important surely is a large number of reproduced photographies from the private and vocational sector. After notes on the backs of the photographies is to be accepted, Emil the Schmitz Hillebrecht all reproductions made.

 

To mark still, which is included into the collection also the family Schmitz Hillebrecht, with the Bruno Schmitz by the marriage of its brother Emil remains was connected. The city and yard gardners come out from the family Hillebrecht were coining/shaping for the development of the green belts in Duesseldorf around the turn of the century.

 

dentification book: Pdf file 4-21-0 Bruno Schmitz (239 KB)

-

-

-

Kaiserin-Augusta-Denkmal Koblenz, Kaiserin Augusta-Monument in den Rheinanlagen (Koblenz).Bildhauer Friedrich Moest, Architekt: Bruno Schmitz

-


-

Panorama Deutsches Eck, Blick vom linken Moselufer auf das Deutsche Eck und die Festung Ehrenbreitstein, Architekt: Bruno Schmitz

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

-

Das Deutsche Eck – is a promontory at the delta of the Mosel into the Rhine in Koblenz. Here 1897 a a monumental fixed image emperor William I. establish. The Denkmalsockel served the German unit from 1953 to 1990 as memorial. On the linksrheinischen bank branches of the German hit a corner the Rhine plants, at the right Moselufer the Peter old Meier bank off. It been based on the plans of the architect Bruno Schmitz, The rider fixed image arranged the sculptor Emil Hundrieser. It shows the emperor in general uniform with boiling that coat. Genius leads the horse and carries in the other hand a cushion with the emperor crown. At the front of the monument one finds a relief with the realm eagle, which packs queues and enemies pressed. Over it in large type character William the the large be ELT, which be understand as attempt emperor William II., a a title popular make, which itself however not become generally accepted can. On the top of the base the two last verses of the poem spring greeting are to be read to the native country of the Koblenzer of poet max from giving village to: Never becomes the realm destroy,/if it united are faithful and!

-

-

Mannheim Rosengarten – Germany: Rosengarten (concert hall and congress centre), Location: Friedrichsplatz, Rosengarten in Mannheim, Architekt: Bruno Schmitz

-

-

Wilhemsdenkmal Frankfurt 1900,

Equestrian statue of Wilhelm I of Germany in Frankfurt am Main, sculpted by Clemens Buscher in 1896. Destroyed in 1941,

Created
between 1890 and 1905--Wilhelm I. Friedrich Ludwig – Statue an der Hohenzollernbrücke Köln,

English: Statue of Wilhelm I of Germany at the “Hohenzollernbrücke” in Cologne, Germany

sculpted by Friedrich Drake

--

Nürnberg (Wilkinus), Kaiser Wilhelm I. zu Pferde auf dem Egidienplatz in Nürnberg

-

-
Saarbrücken (0SL), Kaiser Wilhelm I.-Reiterstandbild Saarbrücken
-
-
Stettin Wilhelmsdenkmal 1900, Created between 1890 and 1905
-
-
Ernst August I. (Hannover) statur, Germany, Hannover , Ernst August memorial, In front of main train station - Carl Conrad Albert Wolff (* 14 November 1814 in Neustrelitz; † 20 June 1892 in Berlin) was a German sculptor.
He came 1831 to Berlin into the workshop of Christian Daniel smoke and 1844 to Carrara was sent, in order to implement the sculptures for the highest terrace of the lock Sanssouci in marble. In addition, to nearly two-year stay in Italy it returned to Berlin and helped smoke at the Friedrichs monument, was independently active – for example it provided haven guessing atue of the countess Raczynska as Hygeia for a well of the city floats as well as a crucifix with Johannes and Maria in marble for the church in Kamenz.In the future it created the reliefs at the national war memorial in the invalid park to Berlin, one of the groups on the lock bridge, „the Krieger of Pallas into the fight led “(1853), and the Kolossalstatuen of the four EH gelists for the new castle church in Neustrelitz in burned clay/tone.For this kind of the execution Wolff in addition a quantity of models, allegorische Statuetten, created small ideal shapes, monumental ornaments etc., which found far spreading. There the allegorischen figures of the faculties for the university building belong in king mountain, the pulpit figures for the citizens of Berlin Lukaskirche, the statue Galileis among other things for the university building in plague and the kolossale statue Friedrich of William IV. for the king gate in king mountain.

For Hanover it created the eherne rider fixed image of the king Ernst August (1861 established), for the desire garden in Berlin the rider fixed image Friedrich of William III. provided with several base figures its remaining Hauptwerke is: the group of a lion fighter in ore on stairway string-board of the old person of museum in Berlin, the statue of the Grand Duke Friedrich Franz I. of Mecklenburg Schwerin (in Ludwig desire), the bronze relief with the introduction of the victorious troops 1871 at the base of the victory column in Berlin and the group of marbles of a Bacchus with Panther in the old person national gallery Berlin. The inventory catalog of the national gallery of 2006 calls altogether 13 of its works.In its works it follows the excessive quantities of the Rauch school with predominantly idealistic view. Wolff was starting from 1866 a professor at the academy of the arts in Berlin and trained numerous young sculptors. Among the most talented ranks William wall cutter, that regarded and in its family operated its instructor as a paternal friend. Also its son Martin Wolff worked as a sculptor.
-
 
-
-
Hermesvilla3, Ernst Gustav Herter (* 14. May1846 in Berlin; † 19 December 1917 in Berlin) was a German sculptor.
[ Sisi, Ernst Herter and the Heine monument in the Bronx Work on

Commons
Commons: Ernst Herter – pictures, videos and audio files
Person data
NAME Herter, Ernst Gustav
SHORT DESCRIPTION German sculptor
DATE OF BIRTH 14. May1846
PLACE OF BIRTH Berlin
DYING DATE 19. December 1917
DYING PLACE Berlin
 

 

 

 

 

Later Herter was formed on the academy of the arts (Berlin) and with Ferdinand August Fischer, Gustav Blaeser and Albert Wolff. Since 1869 it operated its own workshop. After it had made 1875 a study trip to Italy, it established itself in Berlin. Professor Herter was member of the citizens of Berlin academy of arts.

works

  • 1870:

Bacchantin with a boy playing

 

  • 1873: Antigone (marble, in the possession emperor Wilhelm I);
  • Antigone, in the term their brother to bestatten;
  • Orest, before it kills the Klytämnestra;
  • 1876 and 1878: Alexander the large one, with the nocturnal study the sleep fighting (1876). Bronze execution in the national gallery Berlin);
  • The wounded Achilles (1879);
  • Till Eulenspiegel and doctor iron beard, two Statuetten (1880);
  • Moses, the law boards zerschmetternd (1881);
  • 1884: Dying Achill for empress Elisabeth (Sisi) of Austria. For Sisis Achilleion (Korfu)
  • Resting Aspasia (1886)
  • Hermes for the Hermesvilla in Vienna.
  •  

    public monuments [ There are public monuments of Herter in completely Germany and the formerly German east areas. Of empress Sisi, paid, the city Duesseldorf given ordered and pleased by this with bad anti-Semitic Begleitmusik defamed Heinrich Heine/Loreleybrunnen since well 100 years the New Yorker ones.

     

    • Potsdam
      • Büste of the large cure prince at the front of the district court, in a Bogenfeld
      • Rider fixed image of the emperor Wilhelm I., on a bridge yoke being enough bridge on the friendship island
    • Swinemünde
      • Emperor Friedrich III. – Fixed image, on the Grottenplatz at the king avenue
    • Breslau
      • Front fixed image of the old person Fritz, at the government building at the Lessingplatz
    • Prussian Holland
      • Emperor Wilhelm I. – Büste at the war memorial for the pleasures of the agreement wars, on the market place
    • Thorn
      • Emperor Wilhelm I. – fixed image, on the market place before the city hall

    literature

     

     

    -

    -

    -

    -

    -

     Reiterstandbild Wilhelm I. mit den beiden Nebenfiguren

    -

    -

    Kyffhäuser - Kaiser Wilhelm I.

    -

    -

    -

    -

    -

    -

     

    -

    -

    -

    -

    Bild:Monument barbarossa.jpg

    -

    -

    -

    The old Barbarossa,
    Emperor Friedrich.
    In the unterird’schen castle
    If he keeps himself enchanted.Der alte Barbarossa,
    Der Kaiser Friedrich.
    Im unterird´schen Schlosse
    Hält er verzaubert sich.

    He has never died,
    Even now he lives in it;
    He is hidden in the castle
    To the sleep to itself put.Er ist niemals gestorben,
    Er lebt darin noch jetzt;
    Er ist im Schloß verborgen
    Zum Schlaf sich hingesetzt.

    He has hinabgenommen
    Of the rich magnificence,
    And once will come again
    With her at his time.Er hat hinabgenommen
    Des Reiches Herrlichkeit,
    Und wird einst wiederkommen

    Mit ihr zu seiner Zeit.

     The chair is elfenbeinern,
    On it the emperor sits;
    The table is marmelsteinern,
    On which the head he supports.Der Stuhl ist elfenbeinern,
    Darauf der Kaiser sitzt;
    Der Tisch ist marmelsteinern,

    Worauf das Haupt er stützt.

    His beard is not from flax,
    He is from fire glow,
    Has grown by the table,
    On which his chin rests.Sein Bart ist nicht von Flachse,
    Er ist von Feuersglut,
    Ist durch den Tisch gewachsen
    ,
    Worauf sein Kinn ausruht.

    He nods as like in the dream,
    His eye, half-open, zwinkt;
    And according to long space
    He waves to a boyEr nickt als wie im Traume,

    Sein Aug´, halb offen, zwinkt;
    Und je nach langem Raume
    Er einem Knaben winkt

    He speaks in the sleep to the boy:
    ” Go there before the castle, o dwarf,
    and see, whether still the ravens
    herfliegen around the mountain!
    “Er spricht im Schlaf zum Knaben:
    “Geh hin vors Schloß, o Zwerg,
    und sieh, ob noch die Raben
    herfliegen um den Berg!”

    And if the old ravens
    Still forever fly,
    Thus I must still sleep
    Enchants hundred years.

    Und wenn die alten Raben
    Noch fliegen immerdar,
    So muß ich auch noch schlafen
    Verzaubert hundert Jahr.

     -

    -

    -

    Blick in die Kuppelhalle

    -

    -

    -

    Emperor and prince on the way to the monument

    Kaiser und Fürst auf dem Weg zum Denkmal

    At the beginning of June, 1896 were concluded the construction work on the monument so far that 18th June of the year could be fixed as an appointment for the inauguration celebration.
    After emperor Wilhelm II, grandson emperor Wilhelm I., the program confirmed, the extensive preparations began.

    On confidential itinerary Wilhelm II, by special train reached the railway station Roßla. Here prince Günther von Schwarzburg-Rudolstadt fetched him.

     

     

    -

    The idea of the monument created by Bruno Schmitz is this: From a powerful Wartturm affected of a crown the emperor of the new realm rides, out frohgemut over wonderful country seeing. At the same time awaked down in the pre-aged yard space the old Barbarossa, which in raw outlines into here unaffected the mountains remained was immured, surround by dwarves and sense-figurative shapes. The powerful rider fixed image of Professor Hundrieser is nearly 10 meters high. The 8.5 meters long horse is advanced only to 2/3 from the tower, which impairs however the effect substantially, but one says, which could not completely have been abandoned enormous Bildwerk the storms up there freely and unprotected. Spiral stairs lead in the tower up into the crown, from which a wonderful panorama is offered. Schmitz created also emperors Wilhelm-Denkmal at the Westfäli gate and the monument at the German hits a corner with Koblenz.

    -

    - 

    Ehrenhalle im Kyffhäuser-Denkmal

    -

    Honour-resounds in the Kyffhäuser monument

     

    The Kyffhäuser legends form only a small fraction of the Thüringer legend treasure. In no other German race as numerous legends live as that the Thüringer. “No mountain and no valley, no brook and no heath, no rock and no ravine are to be found, those not by the charm veil of the legend umwogen would be.” This circumstance tells us a poetic, heitren sense of the inhabitants.

    -

    Kyffhäuserdenkmal um 1900 – Bruno Schmitz (1858-1916) which architect A famous German, Geiger & Hundreiser – sculptors – Later Section in Postings in more detail

    German: Bruno Schmitz (* 21 November 1858 in Duesseldorf, † 27 April 1916 in Berlin) was a German architect.

    -

    -

    Indianapolis-indiana-soldiers-sailors-monument – Bruno Schmitz (1858-1916) which architect A famous German

    German: Bruno Schmitz (* 21 November 1858 in Duesseldorf, † 27 April 1916 in Berlin) was a German architect. He attained in particular by his representative buildings of monuments world-wide acknowledgment

    -

    -

    Matthäuskirchhof Berlin – grave of Carl Hofmann on old St. Matthew churchyard in Berlin-Schöneberg

    Deutsch: Grab von Carl Hofmann auf dem alten St.-Matthäus-Kirchhof in Berlin-Schöneberg – Bruno Schmitz (1858-1916) which architect A famous German

    German: Bruno Schmitz (* 21 November 1858 in Duesseldorf, † 27 April 1916 in Berlin) was a German architect. Nikolaus Geiger – Sculptor

    -

    -

    Monument to Kaiser Wilhelm I of Germany in Elbing (today Poland), sculpted by Wilhelm Haverkamp and unveiled in 1905

    -

    -

    Schichau –Denkmal, monument, Elbing, - the monument is from sculptor professor Wilhelm Haverkamp, Berlin-Friedenau revealed on the 18th November, 1900.

    The monument of the machine manufacturer confidential Kommerzienrats Ferdinand Schichau, freeman of Elbing which founded in 1837 the world-renowned Schichauwerke stands in the pleasure garden in Schichaustrasse. The monument is from sculptor professor W. Haverkamp, Berlin-Friedenau made and on the 18th November, 1900 been revealed.
    It shows Schichau in his natural, humble posture how he was in habit to go by the factory.

    Beside the pedestal to the right is seated figure embodying genius. She supports her head pensively on the right hand, while the hand holds a steamboat emporhält. To the lefts the pithy figure of a smith, the work showing, with leather apron and smith’s hammer, his man and master the standard wreath stands passing. The skillfully made iron grid which surrounds the monument is an art smiths work of the royal of court castle master Karstädt in Elbing.

    -

    -

    Hermann Balk-Brunnen: Sculptor Harro Magnussen, (1861-1908) 

    -

    -

    Hermann Balk-Brunnen: Sculptor Harro Magnussen, (1861-1908) 

    Sculptor Andreas silver had adorned the old market by a nice, stone well figure. A descendant of that artist did not want to stand back behind his forefather. Hence, he left his father’s town a sum of money to the establishment of an ornamental well at the new market.

    After the founder the well “silver well” is called, possibly from him
    To the 30s of the 20-th century, nevertheless, nearly even “Hermann Balk-Brunnen”. Admittedly, the sum of money donated by Friedrich Silber was not sufficient to the establishment of a worthy Kunstwerkess, hence, businessman Emil Lehmann donated an other sum for the same purpose. From gratitude one has the names of both benefactors in the perfectly circular well wreath gemeiselt. (Grundmann, Friedrich:Elbinger home book,
    S. 80)

    The well became from sculptor Harro Magnussen, Berlin from Bavarian one
    Mussel limestone made. He was revealed on the 13th September, 1908.
    (Elbinger apartment indicator in 1912, page 2)

    Five ring-shaped stone steps lead to a big water washbasin up. In this three dolphins from her open mouths with ceremonious opportunities vomit clear tap water, while from the blowholes of the head jets of water shoot up and pour forth into a higher smaller washbasin.

    In the midst of this spraying water art a serious and quiet looking knight’s figure stands on high stone base. She should show, as the inscription registers, to Hermann Balk, the founder of the castle and town Elbing.

    The knight rests on his sign which he before itself stand has. From his shoulders the faltige knight’s coat hangs to him. This existed of an easy white cloth with black cross, the sign of the German order.

    Hermann Balk has begun the big work, with his order knights
    to convert pagan Prußen to the Christianity, to drain the marshes of the Vistula, Nogat-and Elbingniederung and in the fertile
    To transform arable land.

    Gehörnten and bocksfüßigen man’s figures at feet of the knight are Greek field gods and forest gods, so-called “fauns”. One of them has just surprised a nymph or mermen near Baden and is glad about her embarrassment. (Grundmann S. 82)

    Magnussen, Harro (1861-1908):

    Sculptor Harro Magnussen was born in 1861 in Hamburg. He went at first to South Germany where he worked painting on academy Münchenstudierte, before he from 1887 as a pupil Schüler Begas’ in Berlin. There he was involved substantially in the emperor Wilhelm-national monument before the Berlin castle and created, besides, the Roon monument which stands today in the Berlin zoo – im Berliner Tiergarten. For the town of Kiel the artist made the Bismarck’s statue in the Hiroshima park. Magnussen died in 1908.

     

    -

     

     

    -

     

    Diana-Statue of Karl Reinhold Felderhoff, (1865 Elbing – in 1919 Berlin) 

    In the small pleasure garden became in 1927 the bronze statue “Diana” of the Elbinger
    Of artist professor Reinhold Felderhoff put up. On the left one sees the Kaiserin-Auguste-Viktoria-Schule and in the background the hardware factory
    A. Neufeldt.

    Schuch, Hans-Jürgen: Elbing in old postcards,
    Wurzburg: Flechsig publishing company in 1988,
    zahlr. Abbidungen, 96 sides, page 41

    Felderhoff, Karl Reinhold (1865 Elbing – in 1919 Berlin)

     Reinhold K. Felderhoff studied from 1881 in the Berlin academy as
    Master-class pupil Meisterschüler von Reinhold Begas (1831-1911) und 1883-84 bei Fritz Schaper (geb. 1841). In 1885 Felderhoff received the state price with a Rome scholarship. Rome stays followed in the years 1886 and 1890-91. Since 1887 he was in Berlin as an independent artist active.

    -

    Siehe auch: Stammbaum der griechischen Götter und Helden

     

    Chaos
    |
    +——–+————–+——+——+——+
    | | | | |
    Gaia Eros Tartaros Erebos Nyx
    | |
    +————-+—–+———–+——-+ |
    | | | | | |
    Python | +–+—-+ | +–+-+
    | | | | |
    | Uranos Pontos | +-+——+
    | | | | | | |
    +-+-+ | +-+-+ | Echidna Typhon
    | | | | |
    | +-+-+ +-+-+
    | / |
    | / |
    ,————————|–’ |
    / | |
    / | |
    | | \
    | | ‘————————————————————————————-.
    | | \
    | +———-+——————————————————————————————+————|————+——————–+——————————————————+———————+
    | | | | | | | |
    | | (Titanen) | (Kyklopen) | | (Hekatoncheiren) |(Giganten) | (Erinnyen) | (melische Nymphen)
    | | | | | | | |
    | +———+——-+——-+——-+——–+——–+——-+——-+——–+——–+——-+ +——–+——–+ | +——-+——+ +———-+———–+——–+——-+ +——+-+———-+ …
    | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
    | Okeanos Tethys Iapetos Phoibe Koios Kreios Kronos Rheia Themis Mnemosyne Hyperion Theia Brontes Steropes Arges | Briareos Gyes Kotos Alcyneus Clythias Enceladus Echion Athos Alekto Tisiphone Megaira
    | | | | | | || | | | | | |
    | +–+—+–+ | +-+—–+ || | | | | | +–+—-+——–+——+——-+
    | | | | | || | \ \ | | | | | | |
    Aphrodite / |(Okeaniden) | | |+—+–+ \ \ | | Nereus Thaumas Phorkys Keto Eurybia
    | | / | | / | | \ \ +——++ | | |
    | | / ++—-+——-|——/—-+——+ | | \ \ \ | +–+—+
    | | | | | | / | | | | \ \ \ | |
    | | MetisKlymene | / Asopos Doris | | \ \ +—-+——+—–+ | | (Phorcyden)
    | +—-|———–|——-|—|——-|——|———+–+ | \ \ | | | | |
    | | +–+—-+ | \ | | | \ \ Selene Eos Helios | +-+——–+—————–+———-+———————+—————–+—————-+
    | | | | \ +———|——-|——————\———-\————-|——|————++ | | | | | | |
    | | +——-+–+—–|—-+—–\——-+ | | \ \ | | \ Echidna | (Gorgonen) Ladon | (Graien) |(Hesperiden) Scylla | (Sirenen)
    | | | | | | \ | Pothos | \ \ | | \ (50 Nereiden) | | | |
    | | Atlas Epimetheus | Prometheus \ Menoethius | \ \ | | +———–+—–+ +——-+——-+ +–+–+——-+ ++——+——–+———+ …
    | | | | | | \ \ | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
    | | | +——+-+ | +——-+—+-+——-+——-+—–\——-+ \ | | Amphitrite ThetisMedusa Stheno Euryale Deino Enyo Pemphredo Aegle Arethusa Erytheia Hesperia
    | | | | | | | | | | | \ | \ | |
    | | Maia Asteria Leto | Hestia Hera Hades Poseidon Zeus Demeter \ | |
    | | | | | | | \ | \ | |
    | | | | Aigina | ++++++++++ | | \ | |
    | | | | | | |||||||||| | | \ | |
    | | | | | +—-+————-+||||||||+–++ | | | |
    | | | | +——+————-|————–+||||||+—|–+-+ | | |
    | | +——-+———-|—————–|————-|—————+||||+—-|–|———++ | | (Musen)
    | | | | | | |||| | | `–|————+——-+——+—–+——–+———-+———-+——-+——–+——+———+———+
    | | Hermes | Aecus | |||+—–|–|———-+–+ | | | | | | | | | | | | |
    | | | +–+—————————-|—————-+|| | | | | Melete Mneme Aoede Klio Melpomene Terpsichore Thalia Euterpe Erato Urania Polyhymnia Kalliope
    | | | | | |+——|–|———-|——-+-+
    | +—+———-|————-|—————————-|—————–+ | | | |
    | | | | | |Persephone | Ersa
    | | | +—-+–+ +——–+—–+—–+——-+ | +-+-+—+
    +—+ | | | | | | | | | | | | |
    | | Athene | Artemis Apollon Ares Eileithyia Hephaistos Hebe | ….. Pandia
    | | | | |
    | +—————–|———————+—–+ ,-+———————————+——————–+
    | | | / | |
    +—————+—–+ | |(Horen) |(Moiren) Astraea
    | | | |
    | +——+—+—-+——–+ +—-+–+—+—–+——-+——-+ +—+—–+——–+
    | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
    | Anteros Eros Harmonia Himeros Auxo Carpo Thallo Dike Eunomia Eirene Klotho Lachesis Atropos
    |
    +———-+-+———-+——-+——+
    | | | | |
    Eunomia Hermaphroditos Peito Rhodos Tyche

     

     

     

    Johannes Schilling , (* June 23, 1828 in Mittweida, March 21, 1910, in Dresden) German sculptor, Dresden, Sachsen, Germany

    Johannes Schilling , ( June 23, 1828 in Mittweida, March 21, 1910, in Dresden) German sculptor, Dresden, Sachsen, Germany

    -

    Schilling studied at the academy in Dresden and Berlin, in 1845 he was a master pupil with Ernst Rietschel. Starting from 1868 he was a professor at the Dresden Academy of Fine Art, in Dresden. On 11 October of 1883 honour citizens of Dresden and 1877 honour citizens in its birth city Mittweida.

    -

    Bild:Niederwalddenkmal um 1900.jpeg

    -

    -

    -

    Niederwalddenkmal,

    The Niederwalddenkmal is on the edge of the landscape park Niederwald above the city Rüdesheim at the Rhine. Bordering to the south are the wine fields of the Rüdesheimer of mountain.

    -

    -

    Niederwalddenkmal

    -

    -

    The foundation-stone for the Niederwalddenkmal was erected 1 September 1877 in presence by emperor Wilhelm I. The attempt to apply the necessary monitary donations brought substantial difficulties. Thus the monument was only finished and inaugurated on September 28th., 1883 after the drafts of the sculptor Johannes Schilling and the architect Charles Robert Weißbach (April 8 1841 Dresden; July 8 1905 Ibidem, German architect and university lecturer).

    The finished 38 m high Monument and the 10.5 m high statue of the Germania symbolized the establishment of the new German Reich awake on the Rhine, and the establishment of the new German Reich immediately after the French-German war. Underneath the large main relief, on which emperor Wilhelm I. unites soldiers together with prince, dukes and is represented, attached is the written text of the song  „is awake at the Rhine “by max Schneckenburger. During the inauguration there was a breakdown. The cannon operation of the howitzer, which should shoot after the inauguration Salut, understood a gesture of its officer wrongly. Thus the first shot sounded in the middle in the speech of the emperor whereupon the Rhine ships in the valley now for their part Salut fired. On the middle paragraph of the stair outlet around the monument base the wording of the speech of the emperor in in accordance with ice ELT, which was roughly interrupted by the Salutschüsse, is round.

    The inauguration was at the same time scene of a missed assassination attempt on William I. by August Reinsdorf , Emil Küchler among others.

    Since that time the patriotic monument attracts a great many tourists. Starting from 1885 a rack railway drove from Rüdesheim to the Niederwald, it was however destroyed in 1939 and was not developed again. Since 1954 leads instead a Taxi-Luftschwebebahn to the monument which sites high over the city.

    -

    -

    Rhine panorama, view from Niederwald memorial near Rüdesheim, Germany

    -

    -

    -

    The Niederwald monument represents the victory over France in the year 1870/1871 and (new), and the establishment of the German empire resulting from it. On 28 September 1883 the inaugurated monument was built after the drafts sculptor of Johannes Schilling and the architect Karl Weisbach.William Friedrich Ludwig on 16 September 1871 (emperor Wilhelm I) put the foundation-stone. The  nearly 38 meters high Monument is a symbol of the union of all German races. After six years construction period and a cost of over a million Goldmark the monument was finished. An important, if not even the most important song of the time were around 1870, the song gesiegelt max of Schneckenburger (1819-1849) “is awake on the Rhine”. More to the Volkshymne experience you here
     

    -

    Bild:Kaiser-Wilhelm Westfalenpark.jpg

    -

    Dortmund: Emperor Wilhelm I. in the Westphalia park

    -

    A very good composition, and well handeled sculpture. The Greek Hellenistic influence is of merit here.

    -

    Four time of day
    One finds the group of ” Four time of day ” in the rising to the Brühlschen terrace from the castle square. If one looks at the group of the castle square, “morning”, on top on the right “midday”, below on the left “evening” and below is on the top left to the right of “night”.
    They were finished by Johannes Schilling in 1868 and received on the Viennese art exhibit in 1869 the first price. Original were the figures from sandstone which weathered, nevertheless, too strongly, so that one substituted for them in 1908 with orginalgetreue bronze casts. Today the originals stand on the island of the Chemnitzer castle pond.

    Vier Tageszeiten
    Die Gruppe der “Vier Tageszeiten” findet man am Aufgang zur Brühlschen Terrasse vom Schlossplatz aus. Wenn man die Gruppe vom Schlossplatz betrachtet, befindet sich links oben “Morgen”, oben rechts “Mittag”, unten links “Abend” und unten rechts “Nacht”.
    Sie wurden von Johannes Schilling 1868 fertig gestellt und erhielten auf der Wiener Kunstausstellung 1869 den ersten Preis. Ursprünglich waren die Figuren aus Sandstein, der jedoch zu stark verwitterte, sodass man sie 1908 durch orginalgetreue Bronzeabgüsse ersetzte. Die Originale stehen heute auf der Insel des Chemnitzer Schlossteiches.
    -
     
     Proudly the again-acquired emperor crown keeps the 10.5 meters high and 32 tons heavy figure of the Germania high in the right hand. With the left hand it supports itself self-confidently by the realm sword. On the base data and coats of arms remind of the time of the establishment of realm. On the largest relief emperor Wilhelm I. is highly explained to Ross in the midst of by national princes, army leaders and soldiers of all branches of service.
     -

    -

    Dresden Brühlsche Terrasse

     

    -

    -

    Rising to the Brühlschen terrace with four sculptures

    Four time of day is a statue group in the northern rising of her Brühlschen terrace in Dresden. On him Castle square standing are, on the top left beginning and clockwise looked, to allegorical ones Sculptures “morning”, “midday”, “night” and “evening”. In 1868 completed Johannes Schilling the ensemble.

    For this work he got on the Viennese art exhibit in 1869 the first price. The work substituted for two before put up statues of lions which are today at the southern end of the across avenue of the big garden. Bronze casts substituted since 1908 for four original sandstone figures. Effects of the weather made this exchange necessary. Indeed, the attempt of a postgilding was undertaken, however, missed. On the island in the Chemnitzer castle pond the originals were put up in 1936 again.

    Four figure groups [Work on]

    The first, on the uppermost step of the famous patio stair standing, shows the morning. Above all a fresh, marvelous women’s figure is to be seen, in her hair gleams to her Morning star. She ventilates from the sleeping, the garment and draws a deep breath to be able to begin happy the day work on the new one. You stand a girl aside who also awakes just which fastens sandal on her foot and to the other side a second which waters the flowers from a rope’s jug.

    The second group, likewise the upper end of the stair ornamental, shows the midday. A man’s figure, the head with a ray crown decorated, holds him with the rights Fame wreath up. A youth raises the hand after the same, the striving for fame suggestive, while besides a boy’s figure, with the spade makes clear working, the simple creating during the day.

    At the foot of the stair the marvelous figures of the group Evening and night rise. The evening is shown with a strong man’s figure which leaves itself to the cozy pleasure, besides, to him after perfect day’s work String play of the girl at feet resting to him listens in, while a second one, one Tambourine in the hand, gets ready for the dance.

    From still bigger beauty is the night. She is intended as a women’s figure, the crescent about the forehead, it sits there, protecting her garment around a boy sunk in the sleep laying, while the winged one Morpheus to the slumbering sweetens dreams whispers.

     

    -

    -

    “Abend”

    -

     

     

    -

     

    Sculpture – Mittag “midday” in the free stair of the Brühlschen terrace
     

    -

    -

    Ernst Rietschel-Denkmal von Johannes Schilling auf der Brühlschen Terrasse in Dresden

    -

    -

    Emperor Wilhelm Denkmal in planning and Blomen (at an angle compared with the Hamburg music hall) Taken up in the 6/15/2005 of myself taken up description:

    The equestrian statue with the figure groups belong to the monument which was established in 1903 for emperor Wilhelm I., the founder of the German empire, by senate and citizens.

    The draft of Johannes Schilling originated already in 1889 on the occasion of the competition for the Berlin national monument. With the conversion of the monument in 1930 parts of the monument were moved to the place Sievekings and were joined in 1997 in the current location anew.

    -

    ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

    Der Denkmalkult im 19. Jahrhundert 
    Christian Wagner StRef 

    Lehrplan 11. Jahrgangsstufe 
    2 Bildende Kunst Kunstgeschichtliche Längsschnitte: Kontinuität und Wandel

     

    ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////

    Der Denkmalkult im 19. Jahrhundert 
    Christian Wagner StRef 

    Lehrplan 11. Jahrgangsstufe 
    2 Bildende Kunst Kunstgeschichtliche Längsschnitte: Kontinuität und Wandel

     „19. Century is the century of the monument. At all corners and places Monumente are set up. One is surrounded from” large “individuals. The past presents itself with them. The general default for a monument is to make a world order visible itself, what concerns public places, by rulers and Heroen manifests (1). “„It is a predominantly architectural or plastic art monument, which formally and idealistically superelevated goes into action: formally, because it stands frequently on a base, has an exposed spatial, location concerning town construction or landschaftlichen and in style giving, model, materials and masses as” over work of art “works; idealistically, because it exclusive at outstanding personalities, events, ideas or institutions of the society, which politics or the culture remind (2). “In it rule history is reflected again, because only the power-having were able to deliver its picture and conception of the world of future generations monumentally. Thus their society history can be investigated at the same time over the occupation with monuments. „Society history determines the development of the monument (3).” Very probably the possibilities, which to them the monument offered, were conscious to the respective rulers. Apart from the need after eternity and imperishable fame the monument was used particularly from political purposes. „The ruler monument an ideal, it does not embodied only verkündigt likewise the legitimacy of the rule (4). “The idealized, does not throne-end representation of its or its ancestors is a doubt about the legitimacy of its requirement for rule arise to let. Historical is used as argument during the process of political forming of an opinion, sometimes like official, but not zuverlässliche historical representation (see 5). „The monument can really after-draw the complicated operational sequence of historical processes neither by illustrating persons or events, still by symbolization. This lack can be made a means of the deception or diverson (6).” In this sense the base is used mainly as desired means to increase the effect of the monument. Its task is it then to separate the level of of the low layer, to ensure to which the monument therefore turns, from the Denkmalheldens and thus the raised idealized presentation. The Postament „(…) should not be to low, otherwise the Bildwerk lifts itself not enough from the empirical soil and from, empirical humans changing on it (7). “Thomas Nipperdey sees however in the imperturbable self-assertion rather an indication of uncertainty and crisis consciousness (see 8). And indeed that was delivered historically ever more strongly becoming struggle for power between the politically still dominant Feudalmächten and that more strongly becoming middle class on behalf over the medium” monument “. This had been displaced particularly the case, „(…) since then the absolutism by democratic systems of government is, since the princes placed stubbornly ancestor pictures of their sexes to the citizen before eyes and the citizens by the monument glorification of their political and mental leaders answer this challenge (9). “Lies after Karl Scheffler the cause of this monument amassment in the rivalry of the social forces. „The Denkmalmanie of our days is a consequence of the political Konstitutionalismus; she expresses herself all the more strongly, the more the distribution of power between crown and people is still contentious (10). „After Menzhausens counting gave it in the year 1800 in Germany of 18 public fixed images, in the year 1883 approximately to 800 (vgl 11). The whole development changed however nothing in the fact that the monuments were never works of the whole people, but only from changing groups of interests and layers. Therefore already early substantial criticism began. Thus Scheffler deplored above all that the road monument was not any more a product of art considerations, but from educational tendencies in the service of any parties (see 12). Several times to the monument founders was accused, only advertisement for its products to make (see 13). The journalist and writer Ferdinand Kürnberger stated the outbreak of the” monument plague “(see 14). Like a mold fungus broad itself its opinion after this illness over far areas the city Vienna out.

    Monument types 19. Century
    In principle it gives from the point of view of society history out regards three groups of monuments: the dynastische and the largecivil monument and the monument, which developed on initiative of the representatives of broad people layers. Furthermore one differentiates between the architectural and figürliche monument. In contrast to the architectural or large monument (main national monuments) the figürliche monument can be arranged temporally. The influence of the large middle class on the monarchischen monuments begins in Germany with the 40′s. „In early 20. Jh. steps the development apart. It only hardly did not give monuments for people leaders… before the First World War in Germany or (15). “

    A principal reason form its tradition purchase went back into the antique ruler symbolism and became to dynastischen monument is the rider fixed image. in the end 19. Century by special size and rich base plastics in the Kolossale increased. „Second Grundtyp of the dynastischen monument was the throne picture, which demonstrated rather harmony with the subjects as power over her, or the power gesture of the rider pictures to base plastics delivered (16). “There however the monument a particularly complex medium is, was applicable the rider picture, throne-ends or standing figure on raising and describing base only for generals and statesmen. Parallel to the more strongly increased Postament base plastics was decorated ever more varied with reliefs or full-plastic Assistenzfiguren.

    Kaspar of Zumbusch: Maria Theresia monument, 1873-1888, Vienna

     

    Larger arrangements were made from components of genuine hiving or Erinnerungsstücke. Often cannons supplied as Trophäen material for winner monuments. Hildebrandt saw therein the sad fall of the monumental sculpture. „Brutal, irresistible Kraft all consideration for beauty and harmony pushed here, all rules of the antique ones aside for (…). This lack most obviously steps the monument Friedrichs of the large one under the lime trees (…) to light at its (Daniel smoke) Hauptwerk. Structure is kleinlich, architectural core appears with very much considerable extent without force, which outlined is torn up and misses boldness, since each movement, hardly that it set, exhausts again. Precarious blending of the relief and of the full figure style, from the baroque berauschendem at total effect taken into the klarheitserstrebende form world of the classicism, to which this Monument belongs despite the historically faithful costumes, completes itself destroying the form unit (17). “So Hildebrandt further: „Of Paris Napoleons’ III. is the right fertile soil for the growth of a decorative talent Virtuosität harmless refined of and, how Carpeaux had it. It merges Rokokosüsslichkeit and extreme naturalism fully excited aliveness (18). „ Christian Daniel Rauch: Monument for the king Friedrich II. of Prussia, 1839-1815, BerlinWith the attenuation of the feudalen rule system and the accompanying ascent of the middle class, also this took up the monument with all its functions. This reversal shows itself exemplary by the Maria Theresia monument in Vienna (1873-1888) in contrast to the monument Friedrichs of the large one (1839-1851). „Maria Theresia probably high on the base end represent, under it however a abundance of general, scholar, artist etc., which not when their” subject “designate, but as the” support the throne “. The relationship changed, not the empress shown as that, which prevails over its subjects, but was turned around, these subjects emphasized as those, on which the imperial rule support itself must, in order to work satisfactorily… The middle class regarded itself the group the nation (19) as urgent point of its political actions naturally no longer the dynasty, but. “The main difference in the change to the” civil “monument lies in it that in this by citizens achieved achievements were emphasized, instead of the honour alone received by birth. „On the bases no more monarch or field gentlemen is raised now, but the middle class, the civil genius, that as an artist, scholar or as an inventor the fellow men (…) pleased the best ones. One plündert thus no more the Requisitenkammern of war history, but those culture history (20). “One held nevertheless strictly to the ranking of different monument forms, whose expenditure and form choice depended from very important persons to less highly estimated. Hildebrandt writes: „Germany trains also a ranking of the fame, which strammen of, under of Prussia supremacy imported discipline is only rarely ignored: The emperor has requirement on a rider fixed image with change or other Drum and to, kings and princes on a simple rider monument, generals and statesmen on a fixed image in whole figure, accompanied by princes as a” helper “however only on half figure, mental leaders and benefactors of mankind, scholars, inventors and artists, on a Büste or a Medaillon (21). “

    With all monument forms is the historisierende task to idealize passing maintained. The passing is to be realised. However not, by being reconstructed with all the Mühsal and suffering. The condition for the ideal time shape is to let material suffering drop. „The present regards the passing as arsenal, in order to use it for their purposes. The selection orients itself to the Vorbildhaftigkeit (22). “The monuments were earmarked for special use and no work of interestless well-being favour. The difficult attempts, which achievements and achievements, are various, by which the persons had achieved a admire-worthy status for a monument to clarify through again invented or again worked on symbols. „A popular play of the monument art is it to place the figure which can be admired on a base it to feet Nymphen, Dämonen, Musen, geniuses and other holdselige creatures, which increase the fame-rich man in the realm of the raised one. (23).” „With it with the reaching into history and mythology language is lent to the monument clearly, only. The loans reveal however the Substanzlosigkeit. The accumulation of the attributes, the custom and moral, handicraft and arts and crafts, which beautiful arts and philosophy social and national indicate, have somewhat arbitrary (24). “Due to this overloading with allegorischen symbols there were critical voices, which saw a further problem in the ornaments already at times of the monument setting. The concern, the message of the monuments can not be understood about the” lower layers “even with good will. Thus max of Schasler expressed itself 1878 critically against „the (…) with allegorisierendem figure decoration überladenen Postamente (…) “, „the (…) regarding its compositional accessories, that usually a special, scholarly study required, the people (…) (25) remained incomprehensible.” In addition in the 70′s the rapidly rising number of such monuments came, so that in many essays and articles of the time this” inflation “was compared with expressions like” Denkmalmanie “(26),” monument plague “(27),” monument epidemic “(28). Accordingly the protection against the requirement of the monuments went frequently beyond violent criticism and could lead up to the destruction and disassembly. „Drastic shows up a front formation between the monument setters and the people on the road in the fact that monuments were damaged again and again that precautions entered against such damages their feature way (…). Also the monuments of the middle class were umfriedet with lattices, which are delivered by older illustrations usually only: Dissociation of the viewers was at the same time preventive measure and means, which” monumental “effect to increase (29). “

     

    „Around the century center instead of its was tried again and again and particularly, without getting along base decoration to let say by the Physiognomie, shape and gesturing of the figure – with Ernst Rietschields Weimar monument (1852-1857) for Goethe and Schiller – the figures of everything; but the subtle body language of older plastics bases (…) (30) supplied. “

    Ernst Rietschel: Monument for Goethe and Schiller, 1852-1857, Weimar

    Inevitably however the necessity for a transition resulted to the next period with the time, which exhibits a clear course in the popular as contrast to the largecivil era. With it also the kind of the presentation changed. If one tried before still to set up the civil monuments at large places centrically and as raised as possible then another attitude showed up in the monuments of the people’s parties. Most Monumente in small intimate angles put on, is it by architecture, is it by park plants, in those it in one more andächtigen and calm, less representative tendency be regarded could. The simple man from the people should be celebrated. Straight one therein lay the political explosiveness, which was regarded by the large middle class as provocation.

    A monument form, which was not addressed in the preceded three social classes yet, is the architectural monument. A sharp separation to the figürlichen monument did not give it, since fastidious monuments were very often built up from elements of different monument types. Architecture was often used as basis of plastic elements and as important effect means. The portion of architecture could be limited with monumental sculptures to the figuration of the base, it could in addition, up to the creation of considerable underbodies and frames extend. „The Hermannsdenkmal, the Niederwalddenkmal and the emperor William monument at the” German hit a corner “held still – at unequal architectural expenditure – at the basic form of the aufgesockelten figure;

    Joseph Ernst von Bandel: Hermannsdenkmal with Detmold, 1835-1875

     

    the 1842 inaugurated Walhalla had before already transferred the forms of a Greek temple with Regensburg to the task of German national building; the 1842 to 1863 implemented release-resound with Kelheim tied to motives of the Pantheons in Rome. The large monuments of the wilhelminischen empire, e.g. illustrated the people battle monument, are predominantly architectural with a strong portion of plastics. Each of these monuments should appear as unique, the main motives should not repeat itself to (…) the tower monument is a dominant mode of the architectural monument and nevertheless at the same time a border line, because the training of interiors did not play a substantial role here, which approximated whole ones thereby a plastic indication. It had given already before nichtfigürliche, but rather indicationful as architectural monuments: to their guidance motives (antique) the Obelisk and (medieval) the high cross belonged, in particular at the cross mountain monument (31). “

     

    Bruno Schmitz and Clemens Thieme (architect), Christian Behrens and Franz Metzner (sculptor): People battle monument, 1898-1913, Leipzig

    Völkerschlachtdenkmal

    If the development of the figürlichen Monuments ran off in Europe comparably, then no uniform characteristics can be determined in the large national monuments. Comparably with the German large monuments in the expenditure, but not in the type and the historical conditions, for example the army monument is” Arc de Triomphe “in Paris. In addition, a restriction on German national monuments offers a formally non-uniform picture.

    (1) Bothner R.; in: Augusts Rodin, the citizens of Calais, island publishing house
    Frankfurt/Main/Leipzig, P. 44
    (2) Sharply H; a.a.O.P. 20
    (3) Centrically H.; a.a.O.P. 457
    (4) Bothner R.; a.a.O.P. 44
    (5) Centrically H.; a.a.O.P. 468
    (6) Centrically H.; a.a.O.P. 489
    (7) Fitter J.; Of the modern Denkmalkultus; in: Lectures of the library
    Being castle 1926-1927, 1930, P. 15-17
    (8) Nipperdey T.; National idea and national monument in Germany in
    19. Century; in: Historical magazine 206, 1968, P. 543
    (9) Scheffler K.; Modern architecture; Berlin 1907, P. 128
    (10) a.a.O.P. 128
    (11) Menzhausen J.; The evolutionary position of the standing
    pictures Gottfried Schadows; Diss. Leipzig 1962, P. 1
    (12) Scheffler K.; a.a.O.S.128
    (13) Laverrenz V. and Brandt G.; The monuments of Berlin and the people
    joke; Berlin 1904
    (14) Dresden A.; The emergence of the art criticism in the Zusammnenhang of history of the
    European art life; 1915, new edition Munich 1968, P. 9
    (15) Kapner G.; Sculptures 19. Century as documents of society history, in: Centrically H. and trouble man V.; P. 19
    (16) Centrically H.; a.a.O.P. 474
    (17) Hildebrandt H.; The art 19. and 20. Century; Academic publishing house company Athenaion Ltd. Wildpark Potzdam 1924, P. 175
    (18) a.a.O.P. 176
    (19) Kapner G.; a.a.O.P. 11
    (20) a.a.O.P. 12
    (21) Hildebrandt H.; a.a.O.S. 178
    (22) Bothner R.; a.a.O.P. 49
    (23) a.a.O.P. 64
    (24) a.a.O.P. 63
    (25) Schasler M.; Over modern monument rage, (German time and points of issue, 7);
    Berlin 1878, P. 5; see P. 17 for the popularity lacking of the monuments; see also
    Scheffler K.; a.a.O: P. 131
    (26) Scheffler K.; a.a.O.P. 128
    (27) Kürnberger F.; Literary heart things; Vienna 1877; see fitters
    J.; a.a.O.P. 2
    (28) Courage ago R.; The monument epidemic; in: Courage ago R.; Essays over screen end art; Bd.
    2, Berlin 1914, P. 59-68
    (29) Centrically H.; a.a.O.P. 473
    (30) a.a.O.P. 477
    (31) a.a.O.P. 478-479

    Der Denkmalkult im 19. Jahrhundert 
    Christian Wagner StRef Lehrplan 11. Jahrgangsstufe 
    2 Bildende Kunst Kunstgeschichtliche Längsschnitte: Kontinuität und Wandel

    „Das 19. Jahrhundert ist das Jahrhundert des Denkmals. An allen Ecken und Plätzen werden Monumente aufgestellt. Man ist von »großen« Individuen umstellt. Die Vergangenheit präsentiert sich mit ihnen. Die allgemeine Vorgabe für ein Denkmal ist, eine Weltordnung sichtbar zu machen, die sich, was öffentliche Plätze betrifft, durch Herrscher und Heroen manifestiert (1).” „Es ist ein vorwiegend architektonisches oder plastisches Kunstdenkmal, das formal und ideell überhöht in Erscheinung tritt: formal, weil es häufig auf einem Sockel steht, einen exponierten räumlichen, städtebaulichen oder landschaftlichen Standort hat und in Stilgebung, Vorbild, Materialien und Maßen als »Überkunstwerk« wirkt; ideell, weil es ausschließlich an herausragende Persönlichkeiten, Ereignisse, Ideen oder Institutionen der Gesellschaft, der Politik oder der Kultur erinnert (2).” In ihm spiegelt sich die Herrschaftsgeschichte wieder, denn nur die Machthabenden waren in der Lage, ihr Bild und Weltbild der Nachwelt monumental zu überliefern. So läßt sich über die Beschäftigung mit Denkmälern zugleich deren Gesellschaftsgeschichte erforschen. „Gesellschaftsgeschichte bestimmt die Entwicklung des Denkmals (3).” Den jeweiligen Herrschern waren sehr wohl die Möglichkeiten, die ihnen das Denkmal bot, bewußt. Neben dem Bedürfnis nach Ewigkeit und unvergänglichem Ruhm wurde das Denkmal vor allem aus politischen Zwecken eingesetzt. „Das Herrscherdenkmal verkörpert nicht nur ein Ideal, es verkündigt ebenso die Legitimität der Herrschaft (4).” Die idealisierte, thronende Darstellung seiner selbst oder seiner Vorfahren soll keinen Zweifel an der Legitimität seines Herrschaftsanspruches aufkommen lassen. Geschichtliches wird als Argument im Prozeß politischer Meinungsbildung benutzt, manchmal wie amtliche, aber nicht zuverläßliche Geschichtsdarstellung (vgl. 5). „Das Denkmal kann den komplizierten Ablauf geschichtlicher Prozesse weder durch Abbilden von Personen oder Ereignissen, noch durch Symbolisierung wirklich nachzeichnen. Dieser Mangel kann zu einem Mittel der Irreführung oder Ablenkung gemacht werden (6).” In diesem Sinne wird der Sockel hauptsächlich als gewünschtes Mittel eingesetzt, die Wirkung des Denkmals zu steigern. Seine Aufgabe ist es dann, die Ebene der niederen Schicht, an die das Denkmal sich folglich wendet, von der des Denkmalheldens zu trennen, und somit die erhabene idealisierte Präsentation zu gewährleisten. Das Postament „(…) soll nicht zu niedrig sein, sonst hebt sich das Bildwerk nicht genug vom empirischen Boden und von den auf ihm wandelnden, empirischen Menschen ab (7).” Thomas Nipperdey sieht aber in der unerschütterlichen Selbstsicherheit vielmehr ein Zeichen von Unsicherheit und Krisenbewußtsein (vgl. 8). Und in der Tat wurde der geschichtlich immer stärker werdende Machtkampf zwischen den politisch noch herrschenden Feudalmächten und dem stärker werdenden Bürgertum stellvertretend über das Medium »Denkmal« ausgetragen. Dies war besonders der Fall, „(…) seitdem der Absolutismus durch demokratische Regierungsformen verdrängt worden ist, seit die Fürsten trotzig Ahnenbilder ihrer Geschlechter dem Bürger vor Augen stellen und die Bürger diese Herausforderung durch die Denkmalverherrlichung ihrer politischen und geistigen Führer erwidern (9).” Nach Karl Scheffler liegt die Ursache dieser Denkmälerhäufung in der Rivalität der sozialen Kräfte. „Die Denkmalmanie unserer Tage ist eine Folge des politischen Konstitutionalismus; sie äußert sich um so stärker, je mehr die Machtverteilung zwischen Krone und Volk noch streitig ist (10).„ Nach Menzhausens Zählung gab es im Jahre 1800 in Deutschland 18 öffentliche Standbilder, im Jahre 1883 ungefähr 800 (vgl 11). Die ganze Entwicklung änderte aber nichts daran, daß die Denkmäler nie Werke des ganzen Volkes, sondern nur von sich ändernden Interessengruppen und Schichten waren. Deshalb setzte schon früh massive Kritik ein. So beklagte Scheffler vor allem, daß das Straßendenkmal nicht mehr ein Produkt von Kunsterwägungen sei, sondern von pädagogischen Tendenzen im Dienste irgendwelcher Parteien (vgl. 12). Mehrmals wurde den Denkmal-Stiftern vorgeworfen, nur Reklame für ihre Produkte zu machen (vgl. 13). Der Publizist und Schriftsteller Ferdinand Kürnberger konstatierte den Ausbruch der »Denkmalpest« (vgl. 14). Wie ein Schimmelpilz breite sich seiner Meinung nach diese Erkrankung über weite Gebiete der Stadt Wien aus.

    Denkmaltypen des 19. Jahrhunderts
    Grundsätzlich gibt es vom Standpunkt der Gesellschaftsgeschichte aus betrachtet drei Gruppen von Denkmälern: das dynastische und das großbürgerliche Denkmal und das Denkmal, das auf Initiative der Vertreter breiter Volksschichten hin entstand. Desweiteren unterscheidet man das architektonische und figürliche Denkmal. Im Unterschied zum architektonischen oder Großdenkmal (hauptsächlich Nationaldenkmäler) läßt sich das figürliche Denkmal zeitlich gliedern. Der Einfluß des Großbürgertums auf die monarchischen Denkmäler beginnt in Deutschland mit den 40er Jahren. „Im frühen 20. Jh. tritt die Entwicklung auseinander. Denkmäler für Volksführer hat es… vor dem Ersten Weltkrieg in Deutschland nicht oder nur kaum gegeben (15).”

    Eine Hauptgrundform des Sein Traditionsbezug reichte in die antike Herrschersymbolik zurück und wurde bis dynastischen Denkmals ist das Reiterstandbild. ins Ende des 19. Jahrhunderts durch besondere Größe und reiche Sockelplastik ins Kolossale gesteigert. „Zweiter Grundtyp des dynastischen Denkmals war das Thronbild, das eher Harmonie mit den Untertanen als Macht über sie demonstrierte, oder die Machtgebärde der Reiterbilder an die Sockelplastik abgab (16).” Da aber das Denkmal ein besonders aufwendiges Medium ist, kam das Reiterbild, die thronende oder stehende Figur auf erhebendem und erläuterndem Sockel nur für Generäle und Staatsmänner in Frage. Parallel zum stärker erhöhten Postament wurde die Sockelplastik immer vielfältiger mit Reliefs oder vollplastischen Assistenzfiguren ausgeschmückt.
    Kaspar von Zumbusch: Maria-Theresia-Denkmal, 1873-1888, Wien
    Größere Arrangements wurden aus Bestandteilen echter Beute- oder Erinnerungsstücke gemacht. Oft lieferten Kanonen als Trophäen Material für Siegerdenkmäler. Hildebrandt sah darin den traurigen Niedergang der Monumentalskulptur. „ Hier schob brutale, unwiderstehliche Kraft alle Rücksicht auf Schönheit und Harmonie, alle Regeln der Antike beiseite (…). Am augenfälligsten tritt dieser Mangel zutage an seinem (Daniel Rauch) Hauptwerk, dem Denkmal Friedrichs des Großen unter den Linden (…). Der Aufbau ist kleinlich, der architektonische Kern erscheint bei sehr beträchtlichem Umfang ohne Wucht, der Umriß ist zerrissen und entbehrt der Kühnheit, da jede Bewegung, kaum daß sie angesetzt hat, wieder ermattet. Die bedenkliche Vermengung des Relief- und des Vollfigurenstils, aus dem an Gesamtwirkung sich berauschendem Barock herübergenommen in die klarheitserstrebende Formenwelt des Klassizismus, dem dies Monument trotz der historisch treuen Kostüme angehört, vollendet die Zertrümmerung der Formeneinheit (17).” So Hildebrandt weiter: „ Das Paris Napoleons III. ist der rechte Nährboden für das Wachstum eines dekorativen Talentes von raffinierter und unbedenklicher Virtuosität, wie Carpeaux es hatte. Er verschmilzt Rokokosüßlichkeit und äußersten Naturalismus voll erregter Lebendigkeit (18).„ 
    Christian Daniel Rauch: Denkmal für den König Friedrich II. von Preußen, 1839-1815, Berlin

    Mit der Schwächung des feudalen Herrschaftssystems und dem einhergehenden Aufstieg des Bürgertums, hat auch dieses das Denkmal mit all seinen Funktionen in Anspruch genommen. Dieser Umschwung läßt sich exemplarisch an dem Maria-Theresia Denkmal in Wien (1873-1888) im Unterschied zu dem Denkmal Friedrichs des Großen (1839-1851) erkennen. „Maria Theresia wird wohl hoch auf dem Sockel thronend dargestellt, unter ihr jedoch eine Fülle von Generälen, Gelehrten, Künstlern etc., die nicht als ihre »Untertanen« bezeichnet werden, sondern als die »Stützen des Thrones«. Das Verhältnis hat sich geändert, nicht die Kaiserin wird gezeigt als diejenige, die über ihre Untertanen herrscht, sondern umgekehrt, diese Untertanen werden hervorgehoben als diejenigen, auf die sich die kaiserliche Herrschaft stützen muß, um sich zu bewähren… Das Bürgertum betrachtete als vordringlichen Punkt seiner politischen Aktionen selbstverständlich nicht mehr die Dynastie, sondern sich selbst, die Gruppe die Nation (19).”

    Der Hauptunterschied im Wandel zum »bürgerlichen« Denkmal liegt darin, daß in diesem von Bürgern vollbrachte Leistungen hervorgehoben wurden, statt der allein durch Geburt erhaltenen Ehre. „Auf die Sockel werden jetzt nicht mehr Monarchen oder Feldherren erhoben, sondern die Besten des Bürgertums, das bürgerliche Genie, das als Künstler, Gelehrter oder als Erfinder die Mitmenschen erfreut hat (…). Man plündert also nicht mehr die Requisitenkammern der Kriegsgeschichte, sondern diejenigen der Kulturgeschichte (20).” Dennoch wurde streng an der Rangordnung verschiedener Denkmalformen festgehalten, deren Aufwand und Formenwahl von sehr bedeutenden Personen zu weniger hoch eingeschätzten abhing. Hildebrandt schreibt: „ Deutschland bildet auch eine Rangordnung des Ruhmes aus, die von der strammen, unter Preußens Vorherrschaft eingeführten Disziplin nur selten außer acht gelassen wird: Der Kaiser hat Anspruch auf ein Reiterstandbild mit Umbau oder sonstigem Drum und Dran, Könige und Fürsten auf ein einfaches Reiterdenkmal, Generale und Staatsmänner auf ein Standbild in ganzer Figur, in Begleitung von Fürsten als »Handlanger« jedoch nur auf Halbfigur, geistige Führer und Wohltäter der Menschheit, Gelehrte, Erfinder und Künstler, auf eine Büste oder Medaillon (21).”

    Bei allen Denkmalformen ist die historisierende Aufgabe, Vergangenes zu idealisieren, beibehalten worden. Das Vergangene soll vergegenwärtigt werden. Jedoch nicht, indem es rekonstruiert wird mit all der Mühsal und dem Leiden. Die Bedingung für die ideale Zeitgestalt ist, das reale Leiden abfallen zu lassen. „ Die Gegenwart betrachtet das Vergangene als Arsenal, um es für ihre Zwecke zu benutzen. Die Auswahl orientiert sich an der Vorbildhaftigkeit (22).” Die Denkmäler waren zweckgerichtet und kein Werk interessenlosen Wohlgefallens. Vielfältig sind die schwierigen Versuche, die Leistungen und Errungenschaften, durch welche die Personen einen verehrenswürdigen Status für ein Denkmal erreicht hatten, durch neu erfundene oder neu bearbeitete Sinnbilder zu verdeutlichen. „Ein beliebtes Spiel der Denkmalkunst ist es, die zu verehrende Figur auf einen Sockel zu stellen, ihr zu Füßen Nymphen, Dämonen, Musen, Genien und andere holdselige Geschöpfe, die den ruhmreichen Mann ins Reich des Erhabenen erhöhen.(23).” „Damit wird deutlich, erst mit dem Griff in die Geschichte und Mythologie wird dem Denkmal Sprache verliehen. Die Anleihen enthüllen jedoch die Substanzlosigkeit. Die Anhäufung der Attribute, die Sitte und Moral, Handwerk und Kunsthandwerk, die schönen Künste und die Philosophie Gesellschaftliches und Staatliches anzeigen, haben etwas beliebiges (24).” Auf Grund dieser Überladung mit allegorischen Symbolen gab es schon zu Zeiten der Denkmalsetzungen kritische Stimmen, die in den Verzierungen ein weiteres Problem sahen. Die Sorge, die Botschaft der Denkmäler könne von den »Unteren Schichten« selbst bei gutem Willen nicht verstanden werden. So äußerte sich Max Schasler 1878 kritisch gegen die „(…) mit allegorisierendem Figurenschmuck überladenen Postamente(…)” , die „(…) hinsichtlich ihres kompositionellen Beiwerks, das meist ein besonderes, gelehrtes Studium erfordert, dem Volke unverständlich bleibe(…) (25).” Hinzu kam die in den 70er Jahren rapide ansteigende Zahl solcher Denkmäler, so daß in vielen Aufsätzen und Artikeln der Zeit diese »Inflation« mit Ausdrücken wie »Denkmalmanie« (26), »Denkmalpest« (27), »Denkmalseuche« (28) verglichen wurde. Dementsprechend ging die Abwehr des Anspruchs der Denkmäler häufig über heftige Kritik hinaus und konnte bis zur Zerstörung und Demontage führen. „Einschneidend zeigt sich eine Frontenbildung zwischen den Denkmalsetzern und dem Volke auf der Straße darin, daß Denkmäler immer wieder beschädigt wurden, daß Vorkehrungen gegen solche Beschädigungen in ihre Erscheinungsweise eingingen (…). Auch die Denkmäler des Bürgertums wurden mit Gittern umfriedet, die meist nur durch ältere Abbildungen überliefert sind: Distanzierung der Betrachter war zugleich Schutzmaßnahme und Mittel, die »monumentale« Wirkung zu steigern (29).”

    „Immer wieder und besonders um die Jahrhundertmitte wurde statt dessen versucht, ohne Sockelschmuck auszukommen, durch die Physiognomie, Gestalt und Gestik der Figur – bei Ernst Rietschields Weimarer Denkmal (1852-1857) für Goethe und Schiller – die Figuren alles sagen zu lassen; dafür lieferte die subtile Körpersprache älterer Plastiken Grundlagen (…) (30).”
    Ernst Rietschel: Denkmal für Goethe und Schiller, 1852-1857, Weimar

    Unweigerlich ergab sich jedoch mit der Zeit die Notwendigkeit einer Überleitung zur nächsten Periode, die einen deutlichen Zug ins Volkstümliche als Gegensatz zur großbürgerlichen Ära aufweist. Mit ihr änderte sich auch die Art der Präsentation. Versuchte man zuvor noch, die bürgerlichen Denkmäler auf großen Plätzen mittig und möglichst erhaben aufzustellen, so zeigte sich in den Denkmälern der Volksparteien eine andere Einstellung. Die meisten Monumente wurden in kleinen intimen Winkeln angelegt, sei es durch Architektur, sei es durch Parkanlagen, in denen sie in einer mehr andächtigen und ruhigen, weniger repräsentativen Stimmung betrachtet werden konnten. Der einfache Mann aus dem Volke sollte gefeiert werden. Gerade darin lag die politische Brisanz, die vom Großbürgertum als Provokation angesehen wurde.

    Eine Denkmalform, die in den vorhergegangenen drei Gesellschaftsschichten noch nicht angesprochen wurde, ist das architektonische Denkmal. Eine scharfe Trennung zum figürlichen Denkmal gabt es nicht, da anspruchsvolle Denkmäler sehr oft aus Elementen verschiedener Denkmaltypen zusammengesetzt wurden. Architektur wurde oft als Basis plastischer Elemente und als wichtiges Wirkungsmittel eingesetzt. Der Anteil der Architektur konnte sich bei Monumentalskulpturen auf die Formung des Sockels beschränken, er konnte sich aber auch bis zur Schaffung beträchtlicher Unterbauten und Umrahmungen erweitern. „Das Hermannsdenkmal, das Niederwalddenkmal und das Kaiser-Wilhelm-Denkmal am »Deutschen Eck« hielten noch – mit ungleichem architektonischen Aufwand – an der Grundform der aufgesockelten Figur fest; 
    Joseph Ernst von Bandel: Hermannsdenkmal bei Detmold, 1835-1875
    vorher schon hatte die 1842 eingeweihte Walhalla bei Regensburg die Formen eines griechischen Tempels auf die deutsch-nationaleBauaufgabe übertragen; die 1842 bis 1863 ausgeführte Befreiungshalle bei Kelheim knüpfte an Motive des Pantheons in Rom an. Die Großdenkmäler des wilhelminischen Kaiserreiches, z.B. abgebildet das Völkerschlachtdenkmal, sind überwiegend architektonisch mit einem starken Anteil an Plastik. Jedes dieser Denkmäler sollte als einmalig erscheinen, die Hauptmotive sollten sich nicht wiederholen (…) Das Turmdenkmal ist ein Haupttyp des architektonischen Denkmals und doch zugleich ein Grenzfall, weil hier die Ausbildung von Innenräumen keine erhebliche Rolle spielte, das Ganze sich damit einem plastischen Zeichen annäherte. Schon vorher hatte es nichtfigürliche, aber eher zeichenhafte als architektonische Denkmäler gegeben: zu ihren Leitmotiven gehörten der (antike) Obelisk und das (mittelalterliche) Hochkreuz, namentlich am Kreuzbergdenkmal (31).”
    Bruno Schmitz und Clemens Thieme (Architekten), Christian Behrens und Franz Metzner (Bildhauer): Völkerschlachtdenkmal, 1898-1913, Leipzig

    Lief die Entwicklung des figürlichen Monuments in Europa vergleichbar ab, so lassen sich in den großen Nationaldenkmälern keine einheitlichen Merkmale feststellen. Mit den deutschen Großdenkmälern vergleichbar im Aufwand, aber nicht im Typ und den historischen Voraussetzungen, ist zum Beispiel das Armeedenkmal »Arc de Triomphe« in Paris. Aber auch eine Beschränkung auf deutsche Nationaldenkmäler bietet ein formal uneinheitliches Bild.

    (1) Bothner R.; in:  Auguste Rodin, Die Bürger von Calais, Insel Verlag
    Frankfurt am Main / Leipzig, S. 44
    (2) Scharf H; a.a.O. S. 20
    (3) Mittig H.; a.a.O. S. 457
    (4) Bothner R.; a.a.O. S. 44
    (5) Mittig H.; a.a.O. S. 468
    (6) Mittig H.; a.a.O. S. 489
    (7) Schlosser J.; Vom modernen Denkmalkultus; in: Vorträge der Bibliothek
    Warburg 1926-1927, 1930, S. 15-17
    (8) Nipperdey T.; Nationalidee und Nationaldenkmal in Deutschland im
    19. Jahrhundert; in: Historische Zeitschrift 206, 1968, S. 543
    (9) Scheffler K.; Moderne Baukunst; Berlin 1907, S. 128
    (10) a.a.O. S. 128
    (11) Menzhausen J.; Die entwicklungsgeschichtliche Stellung der Stand-
    bilder Gottfried Schadows; Diss. Leipzig 1962, S. 1
    (12) Scheffler K.; a.a.O. S.128
    (13)  Laverrenz V. und Brandt G.; Die Denkmäler Berlins und der Volks-
    witz; Berlin 1904
    (14) Dresdner A.; Die Entstehung der Kunstkritik im Zusammnenhang der Geschichte des
    europäischen Kunstlebens; 1915, Neuauflage München 1968, S. 9
    (15) Kapner G.; Skulpturen des 19. Jahrhunderts als Dokumente der  Gesellschaftsgeschichte, in: Mittig H. und Plagemann V.; S. 19
    (16) Mittig H.; a.a.O. S. 474
    (17) Hildebrandt H.; Die Kunst des 19. und 20. Jahrhunderts; Akademische  Verlagsgesellschaft Athenaion M.B.H. Wildpark-Potzdam 1924, S. 175
    (18) a.a.O. S. 176
    (19) Kapner G.; a.a.O. S. 11
    (20) a.a.O. S. 12
    (21) Hildebrandt H.; a.a.O.S. 178
    (22) Bothner R.; a.a.O. S. 49
    (23) a.a.O. S. 64
    (24) a.a.O. S. 63
    (25) Schasler M.; Über moderne Denkmalwut, (Deutsche Zeit- und Streitfragen, 7);
    Berlin 1878, S. 5; vgl. S. 17 zur mangelnden Popularität der Denkmäler; vgl. auch
    Scheffler K.; a.a.O: S. 131
    (26) Scheffler K.; a.a.O. S. 128
    (27) Kürnberger F.; Literarische Herzenssachen; Wien 1877; vgl. Schlosser
    J.; a.a.O. S. 2
    (28) Muther R.; Die Denkmalseuche; in: Muther R.; Aufsätze über bildende Kunst; Bd.
    2, Berlin 1914, S. 59-68
    (29) Mittig H.; a.a.O. S. 473
    (30) a.a.O. S. 477
    (31) a.a.O. S. 478-479